Supreme Court acquits Webb, et al

[RMK711]

---

^ Noynoy and our Supreme Court are two sides of the same coin, both are embarrassments to and held in low esteem by their foreign counterparts and both are laughed at for being unintelligent and incompetent.

In other countries you need to be extremely smart to become President or a justice of the Supreme Court. They have very rigorous recruitment processes and only the best of the brightest have even a chance of being appointed to the bench. I would go as far as to say that a regular magistrate's court judge in Hong Kong or Singapore is much more intelligent than our Chief Justice and would embarrass him in a straight IQ contest.

[karljadon]

Mao bitaw nadugay ang kaso, kay sakto gyud sa plano ang lawyer ni Webb. They have to burned the evidence first para dili na makabalik ug tan-aw ato. They waiting for the right time, where things are acceptable to the eyes of the public. Atimana 15 years ni gihatagan on decision, mura mana gipa-amgo ang tawo for being a Bad Boy.....Grabe gyud kaayo atong Justice System, pa-antuson pa gyud ang both parties sa kadugayon, mao ni resulta nga daghan tawo matin-tal sa pagbuhat ug dautan.....Grabe gyud ang bonuses sa mga Webb lawyers, for the job well done, anyway naa bay pobre nga lawyers dinhi sa pinas, murag mao ni number 1 business profession nga dali ra ang asenso.....ang sunod kay mga doctors....

[pepponeskie]

nasunog man gud ang mga ebidensya...

eeepppsss...nasunog? or gi-sunog? asa ang tinuod?

[pepponeskie]

SC based from the evidences...for me its simply like a weighing scale in a factory. If kuwang, reject. If sobra, reject. If sakto, passed. Wala man sad sala ang SC sa pag acquit ani kay wala man jud admissible evidence.

Bisan pa ug naa kay witness nya wala kay ebidensya, mahulog ra ug tumo2x...So, sakto ang SC. It's like a basic program sa excel...LOL

[RMK711]

Mao bitaw nadugay ang kaso, kay sakto gyud sa plano ang lawyer ni Webb. They have to burned the evidence first para dili na makabalik ug tan-aw ato. They waiting for the right time, where things are acceptable to the eyes of the public. Atimana 15 years ni gihatagan on decision, mura mana gipa-amgo ang tawo for being a Bad Boy.....Grabe gyud kaayo atong Justice System, pa-antuson pa gyud ang both parties sa kadugayon, mao ni resulta nga daghan tawo matin-tal sa pagbuhat ug dautan.....Grabe gyud ang bonuses sa mga Webb lawyers, for the job well done, anyway naa bay pobre nga lawyers dinhi sa pinas, murag mao ni number 1 business profession nga dali ra ang asenso.....ang sunod kay mga doctors....

Daghan man abogado nga gamay rag kita. Depende ra na sa abilidad. Pero sobra ra kadaghan abogado diri, that means daghan kaayo competition. Dili sad tanan nga cliente maka-afford og bayad og dako. Kung dili ka ingon ana ka maayo nga abogado, dili ka kakuha og mga datu nga cliente..

Pareho ra ang doctor og abogado.. kung dili ka maayo nga doctor, di sad ka madato. Pero sa akong panan-ao mas hago jud ang doctor kay grabe ang ilahang residency requirement. Ang law student, hago ra sa 3 ka tuig sa law (last year review ra) pero ang doctor padayon ang hago 8+ years (apil na specialty, residency, pre-med).

[karljadon]

kani noon! kung mahitabo man gni ni.. mawagtangan njud kog pag.asa sa PILIPINAS ani.... asa njud kaha nila gbutang ilang konsensya ani.. kung mahitabo pani....

Basig mahitabo na bro, ayaw na lang mo kakurat, anyway tigulang naman tingali ta kung naa na ang decision, murag 30 years na sya, tungod sa kadaghan sa mga casualty.....daghan baya kwarta ang mga ampatuan atimana pila sila ka years hari sa Mindanao......

[black_mamba]

eeepppsss...nasunog? or gi-sunog? asa ang tinuod?

nasunog or gisunog... same thing... wa nay ebidensya...

[masakiton]

We can’t blame SC on this, because they review all the evidence and testimonies reports way before. It just happens that all evidences are too weak.. Yes weak jud, but why it took to SC and all they can say that all evidences are weak? Were it was trial from lower court before it was passed on to SC. Kana maoy dli nko masabtan. In the end.. Somebody will atleast put in the prison. Looy pud intawn sa mga biktima..

sakto ... ang decission sa supreme court kai based on facts ... dili personal feelings

[RMK711]

for sure they will trace all the construction workers present in the vicinity of the crime. they might toss a coin to select a name from list. bingo, we have new suspect. a poor ageing ex laborer.. convicted of a crime..a crime of just being there...old and probably burdened with ill health...without resources to order a policeman to burn evidences.

That is what really surprised me about the interview with ex-NBI chief Velasco. When asked, if Hubert didn't do it, then who did? He replied that there were a lot of construction projects in the village that time, insinuating that the perpetrators must have been construction workers. Also implied in his response is the stereotype that construction workers are the typical raping, killing types. This is how brilliant our police officers are. And imagine this guy was the CHIEF of NBI. The local cops are likely to be much dumber than he is.

Also recall that by the time he did that interview, they were already aware that a policeman was hired to clean up the evidence. And yet he still made the claim that he believed construction workers were the prime suspects. Tell me what kind of ***** concludes that kind of thing? He believes construction workers can afford to hire a policeman to clean up their mess? Did these construction workers also rob a bank? What an idiot.

[muddstond]

@Black_mamba... I agree with you, That God above is the ultimate Justice. All of our arguments and opinions are futile, Because the "Prince Court" the Den of the wicked, Greedy and corrupted Jury's HAVE SPOKEN.

It is clear that they fabricated and manipulated the evidence just to clean the defendants side. OK ra man unta kung dili mag DRUGS...