some points;
1.)
China can harden its stance on its territorial claims as it already has the political and the economic clout that it has longed for for decades now. it can bully neighboring nations into submission dangling the abrogation of trade agreements that China has over them. our country, obviously is no exception.
2.)
an all-out war, however, is something that the Chinese will be very hesitant to engage. simple logic would dictate that the gains for an all-out war is too small compared to what they will lose, foremost would be international prestige and respect. for a long time they have labored to achieve this level of success, they will not throw it all away just for a few measly islands.
3.)
if this can be considered as a "hostile stance" by China against Philippine sovereignty, the same is somewhat true for foreign multi-national corporations who lobby to amend the constitution and allow them to buy vast tracts of land. how about labeling congressmen who support this move as traitors?
4.)
the modernization of the AFP was never meant to address the deficiency of the AFP to counter foreign threats but to bolster its anti-insurgency capabilities. the AFP initially was made to counter outside threats, relegating the PNP to deal with domestic disturbances. however, as it appears now, the main focus of the AFP is to quell domestic insurgency. if the government is serious on modernizing the AFP to even significantly counter any chance of hostile moves from China, it would simply bankrupt the entire economy.