Unsa ka tinood nga naay asawa, mga anak, ug mga apo si Jesus? If tinood ni, unsay epekto diha nimo?
ako di ko ka support nga wala, di pud ko ka support kung naa. but naa ko nadunggan nga naa daw. what i am asking is, unsa ang epekto kung tinood?
Unsa ka tinood nga naay asawa, mga anak, ug mga apo si Jesus? If tinood ni, unsay epekto diha nimo?
ako di ko ka support nga wala, di pud ko ka support kung naa. but naa ko nadunggan nga naa daw. what i am asking is, unsa ang epekto kung tinood?
nice thread bro
Wala may effect kung mao na ang kamatuoran, pero dili man gud.
Ang problema diha kay mahimong bakak unsay nakasulat sa gospels...wala may historical records ana
Was Jesus Married?
Also, since he was conceived through the Holy Spirit and none else, there is no single amount of impure DNA from Adam mixed in his blood. Perte sad daghanang God-man anang kalakiha hangtud karon kung mauhon.
Try to understand what does "THE ONLY BEGOTTEN SON OF GOD" mean.....
Last edited by Breakeven; 10-18-2012 at 12:40 PM.
I dont know how truthful is this claim but possibly true......we can ask this, if Jesus was conceived through the Holy Spirit as what the bible and Quran said, then what could be the content of his blood?
Ron Wyatt blood of Christ - YouTube
Regarding his DNA bro, i dont know unsaon pag trace ana since his body was transformed and had been resurrected naman.
Last edited by Breakeven; 10-18-2012 at 12:41 PM.
@Breakeven
naa lang pud tawn ko ask ha.
What about this Mary's dna or her lineage--starting from her early ancestors so on wala impure DNA or aren't they not decendants from adam?
How is that...or imoha ra pud ni?
nag ask lang ko ha...direct questions deserved directed answers
wiki answers it @moks...
No, He had the blood of His Father. From the medical side: blood is from the male sperm. The womans egg carries no blood, the blood comes from the fathers side. to do a paternity test the DNA is taken from the man. Also from the spiritual side, if the blood would have been from Mary then the sinful nature of man would have been passed into the DNA of Jesus and He was the perfect sinless being in order to take the sinfulness of man and deliver mankind from sin, so it could not have been the blood of Mary.
Also refer to Acts 20:28 KJV declares it was the Blood of God that He purchased us with. I hope this helps and that you too will find the way of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ.
^^^what do you mean BLOOD of his father? you mean literally speaking the physical blood of his father?
And do you really believe literally its in the blood how human beings are attributed in terms or character, behavior and inclinations?
That's why it was called a miraculous conception/birth kay wala moagig normal copulation. Wala kayo ko idea asa na derive about the characteristics sa taw.....
Jesus was also called the second Adam....
Second Adam
1 Cor. 15
22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all shall be made alive. . . . 45 And so it is written, "The first man Adam became a living being." The last Adam became a life-giving spirit.
Romans 5
12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: 13 (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law. 14 Nevertheless death reigned from
Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come. 15 But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many. 16 And not as it was by one
that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.
17 For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.) 18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life. 19 For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous. 20 Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound: 21 That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.
Last edited by Breakeven; 10-17-2012 at 07:21 PM.
There is no evidence to it whatsoever. I recall there was even a passage in the New Testament wherein the 13th apostle, Paul, was discussing matters about marriage and said he thought of getting married and cited examples from the other apostles who were married like his close friend, Peter. If Jesus was married, Paul would have mentioned Jesus as an example but he did not. The New Testament is full of passages about the right kind of woman/wife, marriage, relationships, etcetera, but never mentioned a married Jesus nor had he any special relationship with a particular woman. Chroniclers and pagan or Jewish historians within the Roman empire like Tacitus, Josephus, never mentioned anything of a married Jesus. Married Jesus is a modern invention and marriage is not even recommended for Christians except those who "have no control of their passions" - 1 Corinthians 7:9 .
Similar Threads |
|