Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 vs Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5700

[titaniumbox]

---

Hmmmm... interesting.. and I always thought that C2D was more superior than dual core in terms of performance, but they look even based on the different tests.

Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 vs Intel Pentium Dual-Core E5700

Was planning to buy a second hand E7400(3-3.5k in tipidpc), but after researching. I think its better to buy a new E5700 instead (3.1K+ in GI)..hehe. No risk involved pa.

What's your take? E7400? E5700? =)

[CARLOtech]

go for Intel Core 2 Duo E7400...

[(-_-(0_-)-_-)]

go for Intel Core 2 Duo E7400...

haha same Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
kay mas bag-o

[archspace]

if you can wait a little i will be selling my e7500 here. my vote goes to this procie as well

[FrozenBoi]

e7400 mas dako ug cache ug system bus...

[cloud]

e7400 mas dako ug cache ug system bus...

sakto. e5xxx have lower cache and system bus speed.

[titaniumbox]

haha same Intel Core 2 Duo E7400
kay mas bag-o

hmmm.. but it E7400 was released first quarter of 2008
Intel® Core?2 Duo Processor E7400 (3M Cache, 2.80 GHz, 1066 MHz FSB)with SPEC Code(s)SLB9Y, SLGQ8, SLGW3

while E5700 was released just this 3rd quarter of 2010
Intel® Pentium® Processor E5700 (2M Cache, 3.00 GHz, 800 MHz FSB)? ?? () SPEC CodeSLGTH

[titaniumbox]

@frozenboy and cloud.. yupz, that's the common sense one can easily conclude. but basing on the test results.. they are more or less even.. hehe. and at some tests, E5700 even had the upper hand..

[werty]

will go for E7400, bigger cache and fsb will indeed lessen possible data bottlenecks...

[aztecrevolution]

go for E7400 bro..