Which is better in terms of fuel efficiency and maintenance cost and others?
Which is better in terms of fuel efficiency and maintenance cost and others?
para nako be practical...go for vios...bahala ug gi taxi dont care sa mga storya...fuel efficient kaayo,low maintenance cost...and nice sad kung icustomized...and look at the looks sa vios..kuyaw kaayo ug porma,,murag yaya.an ra sad ko sa honda city...kay ug naa pasad honda nga taxi aw...equal ra..
"bahala ug gi taxi dont care sa mga storya...fuel efficient kaayo,low maintenance cost"
be practical lang... passion and performance is there.
tan awa sad na mga taxi nga gadagan karon, tagpila na katuig pero kayod lang gihapon. mao na giingon nga TESTED na!
Last edited by Ferl; 03-28-2010 at 05:46 PM.
at this price range....
city for exterior looks and design, engine performance (1.5E)
vios for fuel efficiency, exterior looks not bad also
quality and implementation of interiors? neither of the two
on maintenance costs, depends if casa. honda casa service and parts slightly more expensive.
most bang for the buck? imo, lancer 1.6 cvt (old design, average fuel consumption but you get a lot more of the important features e.g. dual airbags and all disc brakes with ABS), parts availability?, there's a store in manila that deals exclusively on mitsu original parts at a reasonable price and can even do business online.
i both tried vios and city (1.3 version)..
in terms of fuel efficiency, vios ko..porma dili pud kaayo bentahaan sa city..
pero mas comfortable dad-on ang city para nako, hanoy kaayo ba..
Honda oi murag taxi ang vios! hahahahah kung na i lain choice FORD jud ko parehas ani diri nga mga model ford parts alberta kung dato pako aw palit jud ko.
Honda jud kay power au kung travel2x kay mag ka dugay mag ka init mag ka kusog ang makina.
mas daku diay consumption sa gas ang city compare sa vios? naa mo ratio sa ila consumption?
Similar Threads |
|