can we consider? (to moderators)

[rcruman]

---

I am hoping not to see anymore BIBLE VERSES , another RELIGION THREAD , etc . If such postings and ideas persist and exist , direct it to EXISTING THREADS I never moved , deleted or merged since that is the purpose of consolidating topics to avoid confusion sa senior threads or threads who existed already .

thus showing of posting verses of the bible violates the rules of this forum or this is just a new/additional/revision of the rules and regulations?

can I still site the content of the verse and not posting the exact verse?

Peace!

[rcruman]

Simple ra jud kaayo ang SPIRITUAL and OCCULT na FORUM , post and discuss topics about supernatural phenomena, meditation, aromatherapy, divination (i.e. tarot cards, pendulum, tea leaves) , metapsychics, feng shui, homeopathic (natural) healing, etc. "subjects/topics about what is beyond the physical world"

Religion is not even SPIRITUALITY so help me guys and gals in cleaning up and making this section a hangout haven for the weirdo's like me and and all of you .

I think we should widen our definition of RELIGION.
Religion is relationship towards GOD, and GOD is Spirit.

Not unless we believed in GOD which is not SPIRIT.

Peace!

[rcruman]

I'm not questioning the authority of the moderators, I'm just asking clarifications.

I think I've been here for almost 3 years and you all know how the way I deal conversation and discussion.
Biblical verse will support my claims, so if Posting Biblical verse violates the rule and its been prohibited Then All I gonna do is just to read and not to post anymore.

Please clarify moderators.

PEace!

[regnauld]

BIBLE FANATICISM is OUT....gets ka?

[Existanz]

I think Mr. Rcruman has a point, by excluding Bible quotes, the forum is preventing another individual's point of view about 'beyond the physical world'. Di man gud maiwasan nga ma-drag ning Bible kay usahay man gud naay argumentor nga mu-prove sa iya mga ideya via criticism of the Bible or Christianity. Na di naa juy mag-alburoto inig-basa nila aning mga arguments.

Nganu man kailangan nato, in most cases, gamiton ang lain belief para ipabarog ang atong personal na mga panlantaw? What do you expect? If we don't want Bible verses then we should refrain arguments that would eventually bring them down here.

Problema pud aning atong mga Bible (ang uban ba) experts kay di man sad kapugung sa ilang gibati..pataka lang sag dasmag maski wa man maghisgut bahin sa christianismo ang thread. Murag mga Rambutito..hinay hinay sad ta oi.

But I respect the moderators of this forum whatever their decisions..I'm just a guest here.

[brownprose]

rcruman has a point... just that the point he always leads us to is the old path aka ang dating daan.

[handsoff241]

BIBLE FANATICISM is OUT....gets ka?

Ah reg, grabeh. *sigh
Mabaw na kaayo akong panan-aw nimo.

I'm not a big fan of bible verse throwing, but the point he(rcruman) is presenting is called "equality. The idea of other sects is as perverted as how the bible verses sounds to other sects.

As I have said before, we are what other people thinks we are and we can't do anything about it, it is how society thinks.

[regnauld]

Ah reg, grabeh. *sigh
Mabaw na kaayo akong panan-aw nimo.

I'm not a big fan of bible verse throwing, but the point he(rcruman) is presenting is called "equality. The idea of other sects is as perverted as how the bible verses sounds to other sects.

As I have said before, we are what other people thinks we are and we can't do anything about it, it is how society thinks.

Sorry my elite friend! I don't care if mabaw imong panan-aw nimo nako kay akong panan-aw nako nimo taas man gihapon! hahaha

I am not here to please you. I am here to follow the RULES of THE MODERATORS. Gets ka? simple as that.

[Ramini]

in my opinion pwede man mu cite ug mga bible verses pero dapat naai accompanying explanation from the poster..let's say: According to Genesis 3:4..(insert words) and it's clear nga (insert own explanation supporting your claim or thought)

so mao ni akong i prefer rather than: According to Genesis 3:4 (insert words) Klaroha ug basa ha! bacn wla ka kasabot sa giingon sa bible...

kai sa akoang tan-aw bacn lahi-on ug sabot sa pikas kng ang verse rai ihatag and wlai dugang explanation...kai mu lead ra ghapon sa confusion..so sa akoang tan-aw much better kng naai pakapin explanation para makasabot pd ang pikas kng unsai pasabot sa usa and para (hopefully) mka connect ang gitagaan sa verses kng unsai pasabot sa poster..dli lang verse alone..kai subject to another interpretation pd na sya..and will lead to more confusion thus leading to unecessary posts nya naa napd bag-o nga misunderstanding..wherein wala pa na resolve ang last nga debate/discussion..suggestion lang.

[handsoff241]

^Indeed sir... indeed. *nods