Atheists put their faith in Twitter

[babynaamaw]

---

The avid atheist is far from alone in the cyber world. He has more than 7,700 followers who subscribe to his atheism- and evolution-themed Internet updates.
When Myers led about 300 like-minded evolutionists to the Creation Museum, thousands more followed along via the Internet, avidly anticipating each 140-character “tweet” about the Kentucky center, which renounces evolution in favor of a Bible-based view of natural history.



taken from ===>> Religion News Service

[Hellblazer 2.1]

oookay, and then what?

[chad_tukes]

what exactly is your point?

[schmuck]

akong religions sa facebook.. Pastafarian

and I can count to potato!

[tripwire]

this is actually not new here in US. We've seen or hear different affiliations [not just atheists] who viewed the bible as the mainstream for human existence. Take instance the Scientology. Their views are different as to Christian doctrine.

I think the point of the TS is to show us that there are atheists who are very active and teaming up for their beliefs and such as that... it's foolish to be with. Sa ako lang assumptions, I could be wrong though.

[chad_tukes]

^^good point.

this is a little OT, but i just want to share this with y'all since we're talking about mainstream media and stuff. this guy i'm about to present to you is a self-proclaimed Atheist slash Scientist. it's a good read. i read his blog all the time especially on days that i'm extremely bored i can kill myself.

Pharyngula

[Ramini]

@chad tukes

the blog is nice indeed..my attention was caught on a certain entry nga murag "trojan horse" style..

"...which is part of a fairly typical trend nowadays: the devout creationist who grinds his way through a graduate program to earn an advanced degree so he can disregard everything he learned to wave his title like a victory flag and pretend to an authority he does not have."

grabeha ani oi..


".. He also began using the word "paradigm" repeatedly, which made me think of Marcus Ross; it's the term he uses to sidestep his critics. In fact, that's what the Q & A consisted largely of - Jeanson avoiding direct confrontation and claiming ignorance of data. My perception was that the whole thing was making him uncomfortable,.."

hahaha!!

[chad_tukes]

@chad tukes

the blog is nice indeed..my attention was caught on a certain entry nga murag "trojan horse" style..

"...which is part of a fairly typical trend nowadays: the devout creationist who grinds his way through a graduate program to earn an advanced degree so he can disregard everything he learned to wave his title like a victory flag and pretend to an authority he does not have."

he seldom uses the term "creationist" but rather substitutes it with "non-evolutionist" which then creates a whole different meaning. as he said in his blog, to be a graduate student requires to be a "little bit crazy". a big shout out goes to the Creationist Harvard professor with a PhD who lectures about Evolution to his students. quite ironic.

".. He also began using the word "paradigm" repeatedly, which made me think of Marcus Ross; it's the term he uses to sidestep his critics. In fact, that's what the Q & A consisted largely of - Jeanson avoiding direct confrontation and claiming ignorance of data. My perception was that the whole thing was making him uncomfortable,.."

his criticisms of non-evolutionists are mind-boggling.

[tripwire]

agreeing with the comments!

[Ramini]

ignorance of certain scientific facts doesn't mean that your claims are solid and has bases and most of all valid...sa catholicism..makasala pman gani ka maskn nag wla ka kabaw nga nakasala nka..they call it sin of omission..your defense nga ignorant ka sa imong gi commit nga sala doesn't excuse you from being tainted a sinner..so sa science pd..kng naa untai i present nga claim or theory dapat covered tanan imong bases..dli lang ka muingon nga..."dli ko kadawat ana imong giingon as evidence to say that my claim or theory is incorrect kai wla man ko kabaw ana so not until i have learned about it or mabasa nko for myself." then kng i explain nmo dli sad dawaton kai ikaw mai nag explain..ganahan syag lain ang mu explain para fair daw..where in reality parehas ra ghapon ug meat lahi lang ang naghatag..mao jd ni usually akng masugatan na setup..tsk2x sad..and i think mao sad ni somehow ang style sa kanang scientist nga naa sa blog..it's either namakak sya nga wla daw sya kabaw or kabaw pero nagpa buang2x lang para dli masakpan..