OT-...or when poverty in the Philippines decreases because they decided to change the definition of "poor".
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/105955/...magic%E2%80%99
OT-...or when poverty in the Philippines decreases because they decided to change the definition of "poor".
http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/105955/...magic%E2%80%99
Fyi.. below is the sample survey background it is up to you to analyze and understand about statistics. Do not focus on the result, check how much is the sample error margin ug kung asa pud cya gi survey.
Usually man gud we react on magnified information, labi nag ga depende rata sa newspaper ug TV news.
Sample...
Survey Background
The September 2011 Social Weather Survey was conducted from September 4-7, 2011 using face-to-face interviews of 1,200 adults in Metro Manila, the Balance of Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao (sampling error margins of ±3% for national percentages, ±6% for area percentages).
Kaning SWS ug Pulse Asia they are doing their job correctly kaso lang kaning taga media sayop ang pag relay sa information.
Remember that survey is a form of data collection in statistics, and statistic is defined as a type of mathematical analysis involving the use of quantified representations, models and summaries for a given set of empirical data or real world observations. Statistical analysis involves the process of collecting and analyzing data and then summarizing the data into a numerical.
before mo question sa result sa survey tuki.a sa.. all the information are available in SWS and pulse asia website.
Last edited by mlhl@7; 12-08-2011 at 12:11 AM.
you said so yourself, that the media 'sayop ang pag.relay sa information'. and so, i'm supposed to believe this without question as they are 'relayed through the media'. I'm not a statistic's person, but I do ask questions to be enlightened.
anyway, anybody there who has had this face-to-face interviews with the SWS as stated above? we'd like to hear from you...
So you're saying a sample size of 1,200 adults is representative of the 60+ million registered voters in the Philippines? And the sampling error margins is ONLY ±3%? They leave out a lot about how their surveys are conducted for a legitimate surveying institution.
Isn't it also strange that the media and the palace never or rarely make a peep about the other SWS releases? Most of what is trumpeted are either approval ratings or the good news.
dili na man na bag-o ang change of definition.
tan-awa ni ai, involving SWS pero kinsa nga administration ang naka pogi points?
this was in 2009.
https://www.istorya.net/forums/politi...ilippines.html
SWS and Pulse Asia polling firms owned by relatives and friends of Noynoy Aquino
http://antipinoy.com/sws-and-pulse-a...nd-friends-of/
Here's an excerpt:
Interlocking directorship within two polling firms
The SWS was founded in 1986 by Dr. Mahar Mangahas, Prof. Felipe Miranda, then DPWH Sec. Jose P. de Jesus (under President Cory Aquino), Mercy Abad among others while Pulse Asia was founded in the 90s when Prof. Felipe Miranda separated from Mangahas and bolted SWS. It should be noted that Managhas is the cousin of the late presidential candidate Fernando Poe, Jr while some of the prominent members of the board and stockholders of the Pulse Asia are blood relatives of Sen. Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III, official candidate for the president of the Liberal Party. The corporate records of both firms that are available at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will also show interlocking directorship with several personalities appearing as stockholders of both SWS and Pulse Asia.
Felipe Mirand, Rosalinda T. Miranda, Gemino H. Abad, Mercedes R. Abad, Jose P. de Jesus appear in SEC records as being founders and or stockholders of both SWS and Pulse Asia.
Mercedes R. Abad who is president of TRENDS-MBL, is the one who used to conduct the field research for both SWS and Pulse Asia.
Jose P. de Jesus of Pulse Asia was the DPWH Secretary during the time of the late President Cory Aquino.
Antonio O. Conjuangco and Rafael Conjuangco Lopa of Pulse Asia are cousins of Benigno Simeon “Noynoy” Conjuangco Aquino III
and another:
What else can we make of this information? Not much except the fact that now we know that these polling firms are so closely linked to the candidate who is now leading the polls. Since these polling firms do not divulge the types of questions they provide or how they conduct their surveys, no one really knows for sure how they come up with the numbers that they publish. It seems to me that there is a lot of secrecy in how they arrive at the conclusion of Noynoy being at the top. Another important question is, since the directors of the said firms are either friends or relations of Noynoy, are they conducting these surveys pro-bono?
Selection of the respondents may be scientific enough to represent the general population. But NOT divulging the types of questions they provide (they could be leading) really makes one wonder on the accuracy of the results.
This is no conspiracy theory. This is why I ask if there is any istoryan out there who may have been part of any of their survey to please enlighten us on your experience to remove these doubts.
Similar Threads |
|