Comments on Former president NOYNOY AQUINO.

[trylle]

---

ahak anang credit rating oi wala jud na nako na feel, mas na feel pa noon nako ang tax sa akong sweldo.

[30121895]

hahays.. ting sweldo na pd ting tax na pd.. witwe

[yhokz101]

ahak anang credit rating oi wala jud na nako na feel, mas na feel pa noon nako ang tax sa akong sweldo.

Credit rating dli ma feel.nato kay nganu way improvement sa sweldo gi ahak nalang.. Proportional dapat ma sila, taas ang sweldo, low interest rate, maau ang credit ratings. Pero di na mao ang tinuod na nahitabo jd bro. Ilad ilad nang ila.

[<SMILE>]

This isn't about the inequity of the situation, that's another story. It's about how dubious our economic standing is besides the fact that there are yellow fanatics here claiming a good economy because of... CREDIT RATINGS UPGRADES.

But the stance of the president does.

[æRLO]

I agree,
but with the suppose economic improvements those who receive more should be taxed more,
not the constant salary of the working class, I certainly do not know why they could not implement this.

gamay malang kuwang mag trickle-down-economics nah...asa mu trickle down ang prosperity.

[<SMILE>]

gamay malang kuwang mag trickle-down-economics nah...asa mu trickle down ang prosperity.

I would rather support the economy through bigger taxes if and only if I will have the proper return of exemplary services from the government which unfortunately very dismal. What happen now is that a few did earn a lot for the expense of having that umbrella of the many who are earning so few and as I could see it the meager earning multitude are held captive of the wishes of the few nominally to promote economics. Is there some kind of blackmailing going on.

[M.A.D.]

But the stance of the president does.

The stance of the president, if he is personally vouching for it is misleading. He knows it but too lazy to know the difference. There's credit ratings upgrades for cheaper loans because ratings upgrades were paid for by loans in the first place.

Then they would just transfer those funds to who knows where.

The next president ends up picking the tab when those loans mature.

[<SMILE>]

The stance of the president, if he is personally vouching for it is misleading. He knows it but too lazy to know the difference. There's credit ratings upgrades for cheaper loans because ratings upgrades were paid for by loans in the first place.

Then they would just transfer those funds to who knows where.

The next president ends up picking the tab when those loans mature.

I am also perplexed, perhaps he wanted to make the low wage income taxes as a safety net assurances against payment defaults. or else the government do have a hard time collecting taxes from big companies.

[M.A.D.]

He did not make any safety net against defaults because he knows that those loans will mature way beyond the time when he steps down. Every incumbent president knows that beforehand.

Also the middle class is the one mostly affected by the income tax and its similar bloodsucking entities. The PH government collects taxes from them dutifully but turns a blind eye to big time tax evaders. Even some companies' taxes are subsidized by consumers.

It has always been like that since Cory Aquino took over.

I am also perplexed, perhaps he wanted to make the low wage income taxes as a safety net assurances against payment defaults. or else the government do have a hard time collecting taxes from big companies.

[<SMILE>]

He did not make any safety net against defaults because he knows that those loans will mature way beyond the time when he steps down. Every incumbent president knows that beforehand.

Also the middle class is the one mostly affected by the income tax and its similar bloodsucking entities. The PH government collects taxes from them dutifully but turns a blind eye to big time tax evaders. Even some companies' taxes are subsidized by consumers.

It has always been like that since Cory Aquino took over.

Yes, I fully agree.
I wish a change will be realized in the future.