
Originally Posted by
dawn runner

Originally Posted by
pazuzu690
the book is still fiction.
if there are parts of the book nga "gika-kulbaan" sa "full of faith" then it's not his fault coz dan brown is just using the age-proven way of making your work famous - the usage of controversy and what better worldwide "faith" to target than catholicism...
if the "full of faith" are so sure and steady about their "faith" then there'll be no commotion, afterall, a little stir in the ocean won't be felt everywhere (or won't be felt at all).
but with all these commotion (and counter-attacks to a work of fiction) going around, the "full of faith" signifies that maybe everything is shaky and unsure in their "faith".
which means, dan brown is not the problem (because, for the millionth time he is just a fiction writer) but the "full of faith" because maybe they are not full of faith!
Your logic is wayward. You mean to say that if one resist of something, he is therefore shaky? Cmon where did you get that? We have resistance in our lives, can you therefore say its shaky? I resist drugs, am I shaky? I dont like to eat tilapia, does my tastebuds shaky? I hate noise. odes it mean my love for silence is shaky? I hate genocide, doesnt mean I just resist my urge to kill?
Since you oppose Catholicism, does it mean your being anti-Catholic is shaky too?
huh?
anti-catholicism?
let us try to read, take time to process the information intelligently and understand what is being written and not overreact, hyperventilate and blabber without understanding...
notice the statement beginning with "IF" - to someone who knows, that means it's a hypothetical statement...
so, relax! you are not under attack because, "WHO ARE YOU by the way?"
notice the phrase in quotation marks: "full of faith"? - it's a general description for people who pretend to be really faithfull but in reality are just hypocrites...
notice the phrase said "full of faith" and not "dawn runner"? - it's because (for the umpteenth time) it's not about you... unless "the shoe fits!"
then, if you feel that you got hit by that hypothetical and general description, then, don't get all "overly hysterical" defending yourself just because the description fits you perfectly... it's not my fault you are that...
once again the lessons for the day are:
hypothetical (look this up)
if the shoe fits (wear it)
work of fiction (which is a lot different than works of research and facts, etc)
use of controversy to sell fictional books (therefore not to be taken seriously)
understand before overreacting
oh, and importantly, reply not about you (so, just relax, don't hypervetilate and process the info)...
also thanks for the part that starts with "your logic is wayward"... you are funny without meaning to (that's all i can get from your paragraph - there's nothing else there)...
i know you are furious because "evil people" are trying to "bring down" your "faith" but if you can, try to
have a nice day!
