Have you seen Poleteismo?

[rodsky]

---

Ambisyoso ra siya if you want to say that he will change RELIGION .

If that's the case then call him ambitious. Better yet, call me ambitious too. I'm all for the stamping out of mysticism, and the promotion of rational thought.

hahahaha.. kalouy nimo brad you mean you dont believe in him dependi na sa tao brad.. u have your own right not believe or what ever to believe.. para nako ni too and ni follow lang ko unsay dapat ug unsay mas maayong buhaton... you called it delusion i call it faith... if para nimo delusional ko para nako i have a teaching that i follow.. its okey if mao na imohang huna2 and i dont think iyahabg gi buhatan ug bastos na image ang iyahang book.. like what mideo did.. correct me if iam wrong... and i think i know what the church did for the last centuries choice to nila dili akoa. but then again ni sad ka unsay imohang na basahan na gisuwat nila?.. but is it wrong that u have a teaching to follow? i think your trying to say that christians are delusional? your not just telling it to me i think your trying to say we are all delusional..

So you're telling me, all you are angry about is a picture? That words are "lighter" in effect to you (even if what the words are saying are actually worse than a graphical representation) compared to a picture. Now I'm not surprised why this nation is not prospering--the kababawan is very clear and evident--"sa picture lang kami mag rereact"...para palang isip-bata.

And if you pity me, I also pity you (for not being rational), patas ra. You're only confident because you have people (and the Church) backing you up--I stand alone, but not afraid.

-RODION

[tokidoki_v2.0]

Who said this is about popularity? This is about REAL change, change that allowed millions of people to improve their lives, not by just "getting inspired", but actual government changes and reforms that provided people with new opportunities for living.

We're talking about REAL change, not "change talk"...if Paquiao really did change the country, why are things the same? Ask around--it's pretty obvious--everyone has the same exact sentiment--you must live in a hole in the ground if you don't believe this.

-RODION

It IS and has always been about popularity bai. Let's see how far you can go with your suggested "change" by being a nobody.

In short, bai, kung wala kai dating, walay kai ikabuga para magpalihok ug tao. So don't preach about "change" here if your example is a tasteless nobody artist.

Ako I'm not fond of the church but even I know this is not a means to defeat them. And besides, that effort is a done deal. Catholicism is dwindling every few years.

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

Lapas na kaayo ang na abot nato diri hehehehe .

We can discuss all kinds of rationales , idiocracies , stands etc yet the very core issue here is being the artist na not so responsible in choosing his mediums created such outcry that :

- As claimed , he wants to be heard but he was barking at the wrong tree .
- That he is a real artist yet his expressions are not of good taste and acceptable whoever views it mapa theist or atheist .
- That CCP is supposed to be a public establishment yet we can just easily say " nobody invited the critics " .
- The artist is being interpreted as revolutionary yet nothing was revolutionized .

As much as I want to rest my case , I am hoping that our resident ASPIRIING ARTIST , ARTIST , WANNABE ARTIST , etc will acknowledge that indeed the subject was INSULTING and being DISRESPECTFUl to the church .

@ RODSKY ...

If that's the case then call him ambitious. Better yet, call me ambitious too. I'm all for the stamping out of mysticism, and the promotion of rational thought.

I would find it realistic and feasible if you are directing this statement to the RELIGIOUS instead of the RELIGION . Be realistic pod . Anyways , do you agree with me that the artist is INSULTING the CHURCH and he is very DISREPECTFUL ?

[WordofGod]

If religion didn't change, there should be more Christians and Catholics in the world today (kay maayo man kaha ni for the people), and people like Richard Dawkins should have been burned at the stake for publishing this book:

Bro, wala ka makasabot kung nganong daghan na kaayong religion nga nigawas karong panahuna! one thing is, Satan is always trying to suppress the truth. Dili ka angay ma surprised kay siya man ang nagrule sa kalibutan karon, expected jud na sya bro. angay ka makuyawan if ang mga true Christians mao nay majority sa kalibutan but that's not the case.

Dili na i-torture si Dawkins bro kay mao na mismo ang gusto sa mga followers of Satan who are in power sa kalibutan karon to destroy Christianity.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_9Cb9e8Hrk&feature=related

Ravi Zacharias Answers Atheists Part 1 - YouTube
Ravi Zacharias answers the big questions prt 1 - YouTube

This book states that you, yes you, anubis, are suffering from a form of mental illness, because you believe in an entity that does not exist, at least from a rational and empirical standpoint. Now, why is it that Mr. Dawkins is not arrested or executed by the Catholic Church, nga gi-insulto man ka niya directly, compared to that guy who made that artwork, mas dako ang "sala" ni Richard Dawkins nimo. If we were in the 1400's, believe me, is Richard Dawkins gipabitay na unta ni siya--but your religion Catholicism is NO LONGER in CONTROL of the world today--mao nga Mr. Dawkins is still alive and well. Understand and accept that.

That's why bro as i have said, the world is now declining morally and now on the verge of destruction. If peace ang ilang aim in the world, have you not tried to think about why the world powers nag contest nalang ug buhat ug nuclear bombs?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_9Cb9e8Hrk&feature=related

Dawkins’ Delusion (continued)

Men who have changed the world (for better or for worse, but change nonetheless):

George Washington - he led a revolution against the British (below the belt ni siya, kay the British Empire didn't think the colonies would revolt against them) to create the United States of America.

Mao Zedong - he led a revolution against the Chinese imperialists (again, below the belt "according" to the imperialists) to bring to China the state it is in now

Mikhail Gorbachev - he led Perestroika, which led to massive changes in the Soviet Union (which led to its eventual demise), again below the belt according to the hard line communists, who never thought that communism will be dismantled by one of their own leaders.

And the list goes on and on and on...

-RODION

Then unsa naman nahitabo sa morality nato karon?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_9Cb9e8Hrk&feature=related

[WordofGod]

Who said this is about popularity? This is about REAL change, change that allowed millions of people to improve their lives, not by just "getting inspired", but actual government changes and reforms that provided people with new opportunities for living.

We're talking about REAL change, not "change talk"...if Paquiao really did change the country, why are things the same? Ask around--it's pretty obvious--everyone has the same exact sentiment--you must live in a hole in the ground if you don't believe this.

-RODION

We can improve our lives bro without denying the transcendent being who fashioned us in HIS image! But if the 'change' you mean is in the inclination to distort morality then, dili na mao imoha!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3t-g4z0Igw&feature=related

[rodsky]

As much as I want to rest my case , I am hoping that our resident ASPIRIING ARTIST , ARTIST , WANNABE ARTIST , etc will acknowledge that indeed the subject was INSULTING and being DISRESPECTFUl to the church .

And likewise, I am hoping that our resident ASPIRING ARTIST, WANNABE ARTIST, etc. will acknowledge that indeed the subject was NOT INSULTING, and within the premise of a free society under the banner of DEMOCRACY and A KNOWN FACT THAT you cannot express a FORM of PROTEST while being "respectful".

-RODION

[rodsky]

your not a muslim? hmmmmmmmm atheist? or worst? the anti......

It's funny how Christians are viewed to be "good" and "gentle"...

...and now I'm being the "evil" one?

Who's doing the name calling in the first place?

Double-standards. *shakes head*

-RODION

[boom_box]

@anubiz

Just say it dude.. Anti-christ diay basta rational thinking ang gamiton?

@rodsky
Siguro sun worshiper ka?

[tokidoki_v2.0]

the guy should held his works in a private exhibit for a start

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

@ ROSDKY ...

So established na gyud diay na kadto siya a form of PROTEST to ?

If thats the case ... he is a FAKE ARTIST unlike the REAL ARTIST in my previous statements talking about RENAISSANCE . He was a wolf in a sheeps clothing diay .