Linug

[JezzyCalm]

---

ngano diay jud to noh.. unsa diay jud rason aning kusog nga linog... wa may giingon ang phivolcs oi...

[rosellellesor]

Paita oi.... usahay, medyo lisod man i-greet og good morning ani...



Anyway, Good Morning gihapon to all!
Keep safe!
Keep strong!

Lahi2 lagi ang values sa phivolcs ug usgs noh.

[dexlimp]

kita ko sa news gabie naa internetan nahugno, 5 daw on d spot namatay kato mga nag internet atong panahona..tsk tsk

[Syd_M]

That was a strong aftershock; magnitude 5.3.



Bohol damage looks really severe: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?sto...85603858187069

[jackdi]

Lahi2 lagi ang values sa phivolcs ug usgs noh.

For us nga wala sa Cebu or Bohol, dili mo-matter kung lahi ang numbers.
Pagkangan nga naay aftershock ana orasa, call na dayon ko sa ako family to check.

Actually man pod, bisan dili exactly the same, dili baya ig-lagyo ang numbers.

[dexlimp]

ang nka pait ky wala kau medical facilities sa Bohol gd na mka atiman lyk naa ma fracture ang bukog, kita ko sa news gabie naa bata pirting hilak kay nabali ang tiil, gbutangan lng ug kahoy, pati tong babaye sad na nabalian tiil, sakit kau na oi, ka agi gd ko anang nabalian kag tiil, d magsilbi ingon ato lng taman ang treatment, manghubag mn gd na sa sulod dn delikado sa internal hemorrhage ky mg cge lng bleeding, kahilakon gd ko mgtan-aw sa bata, d nko ma imagine ang kasakit na iyang g bati, yano yanohon lng pa jd nlag lihok na kanang mura rag napi-ang, nabali ang bukog ato oi dli lng ky na piang..tsk tsk

[krishnu shivaq silquin]

Nisulti naman sila boss just like any other quakes nga nahitabo... Either tectonic or volcanic in nature... Which is clearly tectonic since there were no volcanoes erupting recently within the area of the epicenter. It is impossible to get a spot on conclusion due to the vastness and limited technology to observe and predict such a catastrophe...

Ang maka pungot lang kay ngano lahi sila ug data sa usgs... Which is of course more advance though our local agency kay mas do.ol so ambot lang kinsa mas sakto....

[jackdi]

Ang maka pungot lang kay ngano lahi sila ug data sa usgs... Which is of course more advance though our local agency kay mas do.ol so ambot lang kinsa mas sakto....

Kalma lang Boss.

Anybody can draw a conspiracy theory, big bang theory, corruption theory or napoles theory at anything.
Pero sa pagkakaron, my eyes are on this linug.

Like i said, bisan dili pa na parehas ang numbers from different "earthquake monitoring stations", dili na mo-matter.

I'd make it simple myself.
Kung 5 and up, that's not good.
Kung below 5, ok-ok pa.
Pero dili gihapon kompyansa.

And the distance from/to the epicenter matters a lot pod.

[Syd_M]

Seismology still involves a lot of guesswork. Educated guesswork, but still guesswork. Pinpointing the epicenter of a quake involves triangulating based on data received from their sensors. As more data comes, the more accurate they become. You can expect to see those numbers change a bit as they get more data.

Regarding the accuracy of Phivolcs vs USGS, there's a certain margin of error involved, and the discrepancies between the two fall between those margins. Rest assured that Phivolcs is actually very accurate (and keep in mind that USGS prioritizes American quakes over others). In fact, Phivolcs was able to determine after looking closer at their data that the initial quake's epicenter was slightly different from originally reported, a fact confirmed by the USGS' latest shakemap.

[Vino Kid]

lahi lahi jud na, d man gakuha ug seismic activiy ang philvocs sa USGS naa man tay mga kaugalingon sensor kadtong gpangdonate sa japan... Ang US dinagko na ila ipost pero sa atoa tanan aftrshock recorded pati mga ginagmay nga dli mafel sa tao recorded pud...