S*x: A Necessity or a "must" for relationships?

[synxmichelle]

---

Do *** in a right way.. heheheh

hi Angelic face..Yes that's is a right way..ganahn au ko nimo...kay open minded kah?..dba?

[khent08]

hala! digahay na!

[josephdc]

From our SANE MIND .

Yes, our minds help us know what is right and wrong; pero naa ta'y basis nga objective moral law for us to be able to say nga such an act is right and the other wrong. Our minds didn't invent morality; what it can do is just to point us to the existence of a moral law under which we are all subject.

That is the whole point , who handles or decides the ULTIMATE MORALITY ? The Christians ? Buddhist ? Protestants ? Atheist's ?

Who decides? I guess each one of us have to make that decision. What do we *really* believe? Or, why do we believe what we believe? Why am I a Christian? Or, why am I a buddhist?

But all religions can't be right in their claims at the same time, di ba? Only one of them is right. Possible nga all of them can be wrong, pero dili possible nga sili tanan sakto. So we have to examine them and decide for ourselves which one is right. By being a Christian, for example, you are affirming that what Christianity claims is right, and it also means that what you didn't choose you consider to be in the wrong.

I agree with you because by being a CATHOLIC also but it doesnt justify anything kay bisan ang Santo Papa bai lain ug moral natong mga Pilipino being a European though we share the same beliefs thru the religion .

In what sense siya lahi og morals sa ato? I don't think naay kalahian.

Then someone would also say , WHO ARE YOU TO QUESTION ME WHAT IS RIGHT or WRONG ? In general concept contributing to the idea of different moralities *** and RELIGION wise .

If he's a Christian, he should care what the Church says about what is right and wrong. If wala siya'y religion, or if atheist siya, then it's understandable musulti siya ana, kay he don't believe in a moral law. He only follows his personal preference, and he may call that his own "morality".

It is indeed a strong manifestation of understanding for you , but how about the people who relied only to free thinking what is right and wrong and knew that *** before MARRIAGE A OK and *** is also a critical part of a relationship ??

You mean atheists or agnostics? Asa man sila mag-base sa ilang thinking kung unsa ang sakto og sayup? Unsa ilang basis in saying nga *** before marriage is okay? Wala'y basis kay dili man sila mutuo og moral law, di ba? Mahulog nga personal preference lang nila. They can't really say that it's right.

I think mao na ang difficulty if you're an atheist or an agnostic, kay dili man ka mutuo og moral law, so you have no way of knowing whether what you're doing is really right or wrong. But if you're a Christian, you have a clear way of knowing whether such an act is right, kay you are guided by a moral law. In a sense, you're lost if you don't believe in a moral law. Wala ka kabalo if sakto ba jud imong gipangbuhat o sayup; you just consider an act right just because you feel it is right.

[vaughn]

Basic Needs - food, clothing, shelter, ***, etc
Its according to Maslow hierarchy of needs.

Imagine lng ko....breakfast w/ ***, snacks w/ ***, lunch w/ ***, snacks w/ ***, dinner w/ *** and midnight snacks w/ ***.....kaya?

[Pinkdimensions]

bahala ug way kaon gani basta naa lang *** kaya ra.... hihih..
bisan sa cariton gibuhat porma man gani ang bata..

[merice]

it's not really a necessity...lots of couples ive know were able to survive years without it...but it could spice up the relationship...being in a relationship entails a responsibility...if want it to work then both of u must do its part...just like in having *** with your partner...u know every pros and cons when engage into it...if both of u feel like it's the right time...then u must do it out of love for each other...it can sometimes be a great expression of love...so the bottomline is...u can still into a relationship without it...

[zyLe]

it's not really a necessity...lots of couples ive know were able to survive years without it...but it could spice up the relationship...being in a relationship entails a responsibility...if want it to work then both of u must do its part...just like in having *** with your partner...u know every pros and cons when engage into it...if both of u feel like it's the right time...then u must do it out of love for each other...it can sometimes be a great expression of love...so the bottomline is...u can still into a relationship without it...

true...true..true..

[matika]

Love is *** with Feelings

[kiwiboy]

Love is *** with Feelings

nice one...
karon pa jud ko ani dah...
abe nakug *** is the ultimate expression of love...
hehehe..

[kiwiboy]

Basic Needs - food, clothing, shelter, ***, etc
Its according to Maslow hierarchy of needs.

damn, this by far has been the greatest testimony of *** as a physiological need...