Originally Posted by
vipvip68
did I ever say ok nga mangawat? Akong point is... smalltime or bigtime.. they are both kawatan... pero if one of them testifies against the other, imbis tanawn ang validity sa testimony... were resort to labelling that person as a thief as well and we lose focus on the content of the testimony... that's essentially what's happening here. I couldnt care less about Trillanes and Jinggoy... they are all most likely corrupt but the meat of the discussion here is the truthfullness of the expose on corruption that may go all the way up the chain of command.
for me mas worst pa si trillanes og jinggoy, why? jinggoy was convicted right together with his father pero unsa man nahitabo nahimo pa hinuong senador. si trillanes nag coup d e'tat kay naa kuno corruption pero iya mama supplier sa AFP kay naay power tungod sa iyang papa nga member pud sa AFP pero unsay nahitabo nahimong senador.
i'm not saying here that reyes was a saint. but, he was convicted of anything? moingon ka THRUTHFULLNESS, why in the world karon ra man nitingog ni si rabusa kay naa silay agreement with jinggoy and trillanes nga dili siya makiha even apil siya sa pangawat? mao nay gusto nimo mahitabo? unya ang iyang nakawat tabla na lang?
di lang gud ta magpakalimpyo kay hilas ra kaayo paminawon labi na kung atong family involve and active sa politics!!!