S*x: A Necessity or a "must" for relationships?

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

---

You're saying that right and wrong depends on the individual, right? That it's all up to the person to define what's right and what's wrong for him?

It boils down to the individuals outlook for me . Nobody can tell me whats right or wrong , we personally knows whats right or wrong unless wala pa tay buot .

It's true, I guess, that there are many people in the US who are Christians yet practice pre-marital ***. But it doesn't make PMS right.

Not only in the US bai but all over the world to include the Philipines itself .

What I meant when I said "it's not wrong just because I believe it's wrong; it's wrong regardless of my saying so," is that there is such a thing as an objective moral law that exists.

But like I said that doesnt justify either that you are right . Who knows deep inside you is the other way around but because you have to incline in your beliefs , it has to be implemented no matter what it is .

Unsa'y reason bro ngano dili ka mutuo sa uban teachings?

Ahould I start the first one of the hundreds if not thousands of reasons ?

You asked me what if civil marriage lang di ba?

Unya involved man ang mga ATHIEST ana .

Dili jud maayo if sa huwes lang mo magpakasal kay in the eyes of God you're not married. If serious jud inyong relationship, it requires both your commitment at the altar. Mao pud siguro na'y reason nganong naay uban civil marriage lang, it's convenient. Dali ra talikdan ang commitment.

Hehehe ... outside religion lang bai noh .... CIVIL DOCUMENTS are more legit , influential and powerful than any CHURCH documents .

Pre-marital ***.

Tnx ... wala gyud kabalo mao diay na pasabot nimo hehehe .

The church's teaching on *** is really beautiful and true. Try to read about the theology of the body.

It is indeed to a certain individual on his or her approach to sexuality . Like I said it boils down to being SUBJECTTIVE instead of being OBJECTIVE .

[m1000]

OT: relativist diay ka springfield?



***: a necessity or a must for relationship...
necessary if married na ang tao
not necessary if dili siya married... kay sin man

mao ra ni ako kay kapoy au nang essay...

[josephdc]

It boils down to the individuals outlook for me . Nobody can tell me whats right or wrong , we personally knows whats right or wrong unless wala pa tay buot .

Yes, but where did this idea that we have of right and wrong come from?

It's true that we can call our set of beliefs, values and opinions as our own "morality"; but there's also such a thing as a Real Morality, against which we, all of us, measure our sense of right and wrong. If you're a Christian and I'm a Buddhist, we may have different sets of "moralities", but there's a Moral Law against which we measure our sense of right and wrong. Different civilizations and cultures throughout history may have different "moralities", but they basically share a common sense of what's right and what's wrong.

But like I said that doesnt justify either that you are right . Who knows deep inside you is the other way around but because you have to incline in your beliefs , it has to be implemented no matter what it is .

I hope not... But actually our religion is very beautiful because it is also grounded on reason, on logic, on philosophy. Theology is a very rich field of study, nga no matter how you study it, you can never really come close to plumbing the depths of God's mystery. I mean, countless brilliant minds have devoted their lives to studying theology, but they have never exhausted the subject.

There's a nice quote by C. S. Lewis that goes, "I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen, not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else."

Hehehe ... outside religion lang bai noh .... CIVIL DOCUMENTS are more legit , influential and powerful than any CHURCH documents .

But the question is, will it be moral? In the eyes of the law, yes you are married... But why set aside your religion when making such important decisions in one's life as getting married? I mean, it's truly important. Unless you don't take your religion seriously.

Tnx ... wala gyud kabalo mao diay na pasabot nimo hehehe .

Abi nako nagbinuang raka sa imong pangutana.

It is indeed to a certain individual on his or her approach to sexuality . Like I said it boils down to being SUBJECTTIVE instead of being OBJECTIVE .

Actually dili gyud siya subjective kay dili siya invention sa Church, the teaching on sexuality. It's the fruit of theology. Theology is the study of God, right? Theology of the body is the study of God in the body. Sounds weird, but actually there's an explanation: Imprinted in the body are signs for God's purpose for our body, our sexuality, our very selves. Fascinating kaayo siya tun-an pero lisud lang sabton usahay.

[simoncpu]

It boils down to the individuals outlook for me . Nobody can tell me whats right or wrong , we personally knows whats right or wrong unless wala pa tay buot .

Actually, people can tell me what's right or wrong. Right or wrong is not something that us or other people decide. Right or wrong is simply is. The questions is whether we choose to do right or wrong.

As for ***, who the bleeep told us that it is a necessity for relationship? Whoever believes that must be bleeep.

If you want to have ***, then go ahead. I'm happy for you. If you can't have one, well, that's another story. Hehehe.

[ simon.cpu ]

[Genocide]

agree ko ani!

[bokiratx]

aswer is nope jed

[^-^ eLay ^-^]

A must kung lamian....





pEacE....

[caspey]

A must kung lamian....





pEacE....

are u n a relationship?

[ej___]

are u n a relationship?

Aguy. Prankahay na ni.

[caspey]

Aguy. Prankahay na ni.

hehehe.. peace...