From Dust to Man: A Scientific Proof

[dartzed]

---

hey hey hey, if you havent read some of my posts, i believe there were certain people from here who also mentioned "science does not claim absolute truths" was it nemo or munzter or someone(will check other threads for sure)...that is why it is always open for falcification if new evidences are presented.

idont care unsa na iya gpost basta lahi amu nastoryaan... kbantay ka kinsa ako kastorya?...
my advice: pls read of what we are talking 1st.. mura man ka niad2 gira nya wala dalang armas..

and you dont buy a car because you know it will eventually breakdown in the future, right?? haha

ikaw man guro wala kasabot?... basaha balik dba mao na ako point...

btw,
not really, was being sarcastic if i wasnt mistaken.hahaha
you see, calling science nothing, scares the sh!t out of me you see....thats how the dark ages prevailed.
perhaps it would be useful to know that science only flourished in the west during the time of the renaissance, when the church was still licking its wounds from the failed crusades and intellectuals began to study humanism from pagan works which were previously prohibited by the church.

think about it... :mrgreen:

pls. read, use your logic if you really are smart...
and where in the world did i ever posted that i hate science?... did i ever posted that scince has no use?..
tsk tsk tsk

unsa pagtuo nimo nkow uneducated?... wahuhuhu

hahay ikaw jud noh imu man libogon ang ako tumong na ipa explain rman nko ang kanang qouted dha sa taas...


hehehe

[IdontCare]

The bible is not scientific because its not a book for science.

but because its not scienctific doesnt mean that it does not contain the truth.

[silent-kill]

dear rcruman and others,

please take time of watching this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozbFerzjkz4

[bcasabee]

Agree......

The bible is not scientific because its not a book for science.

but because its not scienctific doesnt mean that it does not contain the truth.

[kowkruche]

hey guys! check this blog From Dust to Man: A Scientific Proof Eliseo Soriano


what can you say?

[regnauld]

From DUSK till DAWN?

[brownprose]

Balik naman ni kang rcruman man ni sa una...

Anyways, not at all scientific proof but a scientific opinion. Not all scientific opinions are true. It tries to appear scientific to prove creationism pero layo ra sa tinood.

Questions to ponder:

Why do you think that man was created from out of dust not in the same way he was created like the animals? why does it have to take a dust to create man than "Let there be man." When you take literally what is said in the Bible problems of interpretation surface.

I move kaha ni sa creationist thread no?

[NASYO]

I move kaha ni sa creationist thread no?

mas maayo nga i-move ni didto nga thread.

dust can't be turned to human.
but human will return to dust.

[crimsonking]

we are made of the same materials as the stars

[regnauld]

we are made of the same materials as the stars

Yes in terms of the physical body that comprises the molecules, atoms, and sub atomic particles!