The unpopular Bible Verses (no arguments, just read!) Theists not welcomed unless you havent read the whole bible.

[emow]

---

Balik2 anang killing of children.Ayaw lagi pagbuot sa desisyon sa Ginoo.

Let's go back to Adam and Eve, kay nakasala man sila, apil sad ta nag antus ug nagpuyo niining kalibutana bsan wa ta nakabuhat sa sala nila.

Ug wala ta giapil sa nakasala, naa na unta ta sa langit ron nagdinakpanay. Kidding aside, Nakuha nimo akong point?


A diseased tree cannot bear good fruit.

Who are we to question the will of God? You surely know the difference between a man and a God right?

So unsa may pagsabut nimo sa Isaiah 55:8–9

For my thoughts are not your thoughts,
neither are your ways my ways, declares the Lord.

For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
so are my ways higher than your ways
and my thoughts than your thoughts.

so says the imaginary being. Is it okay to kill the child of a criminal then?

[NapoleonBlownapart]

Nope. No corroboration from other leading writers on the time the of Jesus. Example, there are no evidence for the existence of Socrates but there are many corroborative writings during his time from various writers therefore Socrates most probably existed. Jesus on the other hand, has none. As great as he has done, writers forgot to document it. Only after a century did records of Jesus surfaced, and some were deliberate fabrications by some leaders of early christianity. I hope this will be our last interaction in this thread. I'm sure some other threads would make your time worthwhile. spread the "good news." yey

It's important to note that Christianity was outlawed. It would have been easier to stop the spread of that movement by saying Jesus did not exist, but none argued against his existence. Not the Babylonian Talmud written by the Jews and not the Annals by Tacitus who seem to hate the Christians. Instead they wrote about Jesus and related events that happened, albeit not favorably.

[emow]

Ug wala ka nitoo ug Bible ug Ginoo TS then unbelievers like you would say nga everything in the bible didn't happen or wala xa ni exist.

So, why are you questioning these events nga wala man diay ni nahitabo or ni exist?

Where's our logic here?or common sense? Lupig pa ang nagdinakpanay ug utot nato ani?

Its the bullshit I grew up with, if i were a muslim then probably i would tackle Qur'an. It would have been better if i was not exposed to it. Their non existence is not the issue. Its the absurdity of the ideas in the Bible that I just want to lay it out, and there are tons of bad ideas in the bible. Most bibles are just dust collectors really. Why keep on staying this thread? Go out there and make a thread of your own? Then you can post your interpretations there. We need not engage with each other. Take the high road, christian.

[emow]

It's important to note that Christianity was outlawed. It would have been easier to stop the spread of that movement by saying Jesus did not exist, but none argued against his existence. Not the Babylonian Talmud written by the Jews and not the Annals by Tacitus who seem to hate the Christians. Instead they wrote about Jesus and related events that happened, albeit not favorably.

Good for a different thread for discussion. but no arguments here. Im clearly sidetracked by theists. Create another thread, maybe I can contribute some inputs about JC's existence.

[noy]

theists, you're giving the TS the satisfaction of getting the attention he seeks. just in case you didn't notice the so called "warning" in the title actually suggests the opposite which is what the TS so desire, I believe reverse psychology is the term and you are willingly falling for it. hehehe. just leave the TS be kay he's entitled to his opinion man pud no matter how ridiculous they may seem.

[raissah]

theists, you're giving the TS the satisfaction of getting the attention he seeks. just in case you didn't notice the so called "warning" in the title actually suggests the opposite which is what the TS so desire, I believe reverse psychology is the term and you are willingly falling for it. hehehe. just leave the TS be kay he's entitled to his opinion man pud no matter how ridiculous they may seem.

Bitaw noy sa.. karon pa ko kabantay. Anyway, ganahan ra ko mogawas jud ang tinood nga tuyo sa TS kung wala ba jud cyay daotan nga intention. Pero natubag na akong pangutana.. Pasagdaan na lang na siya kay nigawas ra jud ang tinood. Obviously, wala cya nangita ug unpopular bible verse. Ganahan ra jud cya makig trukis ug mga believers.

Its the absurdity of the ideas in the Bible that I just want to lay it out

[heartthr0b]

psalm 23 the lord is my shepherd..

unsay buhaton sa shepherd sa mga sheep?? IHAWON.. HAHAHAHA!!

[heartthr0b]

Ug wala ka nitoo ug Bible ug Ginoo TS then unbelievers like you would say nga everything in the bible didn't happen or wala xa ni exist.

So, why are you questioning these events nga wala man diay ni nahitabo or ni exist?

Where's our logic here?or common sense? Lupig pa ang nagdinakpanay ug utot nato ani?

wala nag exist ang cure para sa cancer.. pero di pasabot di na nato na istoryahan


we talk about god not because god exist but because theist exists.
-darkmatter2525

[Walking KB]

so says the imaginary being. Is it okay to kill the child of a criminal then?

The sixth commandment, in Exodus 20:13, does not actually say, "Thou shalt not kill" as translated in the old King James. A more accurate translation is provided in many of the newer versions, such as the NIV, which says, "You shall not murder." The Bible forbids the act of murder, which means the unjustified taking of a person's life (including suicide, abortion, and euthanasia), but it doesn't forbid all killing. In fact, it is sometimes very adamant that killing is the right thing to do, but it must be justified in God's eyes.

Both Hebrew and English have two words for taking a life — one is “kill” (harag, in Hebrew) and the other is “murder” (ratzach in Hebrew).

The difference between the two is enormous. Kill means:

1) Taking any life — whether of a human being or an animal.

2) Taking a human life deliberately or by accident.


On the other hand, murder can only mean one thing: The illegal or immoral taking of a human life. That’s why we say, “I killed a mosquito,” not, “I murdered a mosquito.” And that’s why we would say that “the worker was accidentally killed,” not that “the worker was accidentally murdered.”

- - - Updated - - -

psalm 23 the lord is my shepherd..

unsay buhaton sa shepherd sa mga sheep?? IHAWON.. HAHAHAHA!!

Wala ko kasabut sa imong "HAHAHA".pagbugal2 ni or wala lang jud ka kasabut sa psalm 23?

[Walking KB]

wala nag exist ang cure para sa cancer.. pero di pasabot di na nato na istoryahan

Are you sure nga wala pay cure ang cancer?unsa nga cancer imong pasabut?.

Nganong i compare man nimo ang cure sa cancer ug bible events?Unsay connection sa duha?