Originally Posted by
ongkal
nganuman? abi daghan ug gossips sa side ads ato nga site, di na diay siya legitimate news? tanawa kuno unsay sud sa main news section ato nga site kung binuang ba sad ang uban nila gipangpost. the publication of that site is the 2nd biggest-selling newspaper sa UK. does it count for something if news comes from that source? or gusto ka blog ta manguhag source?
bottomline is, if news from a publication that big causes an uproar internationally, dapat ta maaware. and the news isnt just about MREs. ang issue about hoarding and assisting only "selected" voters klaro kaayo na. didto kos san remegio, ang mga buang nga barangay captain kay itago ang mga Aboitiz relief ticket sa ilang manunupyo thinking nga ibilin ra sa Aboitiz ang tanan mga goods nila. ang nahitabo, katong wala nay nanuol nga mga civilians nga naay tickets (kay gitago raman diay sa officials ang mga tickets), nidiritso ang aboitiz trak nga daghan pag relief goods sa uban barangay nya luoy intawn kaayo ang mga manunupyo kay way nakuha. nya awa ang nahitabo sa medellin:
Medellin, Cebu After Typhoon Haiyan/Yolanda - YouTube
tanawa unsa na kapoliticking bisan atong cebu provincial government. ang mayor diha papa sa akong amigo so kaybaw ko unsa sila kaluoy didto.
nya awa gud unsa ka condescending imong reply. murag way right ang uban ispread ang news kay abi gatuo ka ikaw ang sakto? magbutabuta nalang diay ta ani diay.
The Article is frank. Gikan sah mixed topics, sources, medias bunged up in 1 story. Too lazy to go here to make their own report. That's it. I'm not commenting about how'd it go there, believe me my heart is all for the victims of the storm. But benefit of the doubt always settles in my mind. Till I get the story straight for multiple people...not just one... then I still consider it chismis
There was even a court case regarding a blogger can be called a media-man so they can be coated with all the immunities... And then the government won.. that was in the US though... Bloggers thinking to themselves to be media so they can talk whatever they want that they don't agree on
And some media men hiding under the coat of the media to be protected from the law is balls-shit. Then came social media pips who's post is more viral the more controversial even there is no 'solid proof'.
We are Ruled by Law not by Men... meaning tanan mo agi ug balaod including proofs being solid, visible to the court... ug dili chika sah gawas sah corte sah mga 'men' daw. That would be trial-won by publicity nuon.