Overpopulation good for Filipinos, says bishop

[qwertyuiop404]

---

d jud maau ang overpopulation..mao nah ang usa nga pinakadako nga problema sa atong economy rn..

[God'sWarfare]

mao jud! lisod kaayo ang daghan kaayo ug tawo gubot niya kulangan ug trabaho.. mao gihapon magabroad.

[powerplay]

Overpopulation and lack of education will indirectly contribute to lack of jobs

[vahnhelsing]

usahay makaingon ko, maytag mosulay nig minyo ang mga pari ug mobuhi sa ilahang pamilya
mintras nanarbaho para makahatag gayud sila ug mga saktong panahom.

[Xian120]

dpat unta naa ni silay consesus kong unsa ang ipang yaw2 sa altar, kay motuo jud bya ang mga tawo ani nila, influential kyo ni sila sa mga manimbahay, permi nlang ko mka dungog ug mga pagpanglibak sa ilang mga wali, naa jud silay common nga mga ideolohiya,.. tsk tsk tsk, parishioners beware sa inyong mga madunggan, not all of it is just and true..

[gelsor]

EQUAL rata dire kalibutana ug naay mga kaugalingong Opinions susama rasab ni your highness bishop "Garcera" ngadto sa mga katawhan. Ngano ingon ana man niya kasayon isulti (eh-generalize sa tanan) nga OK ra ang overpopulation sa Pinas ky tungod pwede masulbad abroad ug uban pa...blah-blah? Unsa iyang basihan 10,000 nga pamilya dayon SAKTO na cya!?? pagTsure mo uy! PAREHAS rata gatarbaho ug parehas rata pwede MOBUHAT ug maayo, asa kaha kung e-swap atong tarbaho haron ma-feel sab ninyo ang kinabuhi nga pamilyado? joke...heheh Pwerte ka sayon ninyo ga-NGAL2X murag gabasa Cinderella story pero dili kamo ang maoy main casts...

Ang gobyerno naninguha unsa pay pwede buhaton haron makuhaan ang problema ug usa niana mao ning "overpopulation". Naglibog ko ngano jud dili sila uyon, nga wala may nausab kung naay RH bill? Para sa mga katoliko, ngano diay kung padayon lang gihapon inyong praktis ug unsa pa diha nga makaayo?

Sa tinuoray WALAY nausab, mas napun-an pa ang SOLUSYON! kung mg-combine inyong solusyon ug ang solusyon sa Gobyerno, UNSAY problema ana? Gawas lang cguro naay maapektahan nga DILI na mahitungod sa "Solusyon" ug mao naning pangutana gatangag ug dakong ganti? heheh Ga-sige lang mo hunahuna anang daotan nga murag mog mga espesyalista na doktor paminawon! Ayohon daw nato tagsa2 ang atong mga tarbaho - inyoha ky naa sa simbahan, ang amoa ky bisag unsa nlang dire pwede mosulod sa construction, manumod sa merkado, driver, helper, maninda sigarilyo ug uban pa haron intawn mabuhi ang among pamilya. Kung ang tanan focus lang tagsa2x sa angay na buhaton cgurado daghan jud mahimong maayo nga resulta...

Kahibalo ba mo kagukod pa intawon ta sa atong mga silingan nga nasod nga SAUNA pwerte pa kapobreha kysa nato? ug mao ni ang atong challenge sa atong tagsa2x nga Pilipino --- Peace!

[Liberate_Llama]

aaaah wa na silay ayo may lng sa chx.

[noy]

haha..relax guys, here's an article which we can consider as the other side of the coin.
perhaps possible results of RH Bill or some of the disadvantages apart from moral issues.
source:The Catholic Position on the RH Law: Meg Francisco

We know from watching other countries’ experience that any kind of population target/norm leads to social programs that bring abuse and irreversibility. How we view our children isn’t a changeable thing. Once a generation begins to believe that pregnancies are to be feared and even reviled, whether you’re poor or not, you can’t just switch on a sudden desire for children and large families.


See how Singapore is struggling to correct its 1970s population control policy, which led to a decline in total fertility rate to 1.1 child per woman, well below the replacement rate of 2.1 (two children to replace the two parents). The government implemented in 2001 a Baby Bonus scheme, and even enhanced it in 2004. Yet the children just aren’t coming. Singaporeans are not enticed with the cash gifts or matched savings as against the perceived burden of having children. So to keep the population of Singapore from declining, the government launched an immigration policy. This in turn has caused social repercussions and the need to set up quotas to favor employment of local residents over talented immigrants.


Take another example: China. In March, the Chinese government, alarmed about the problems its 30-year-old population policy has caused, announced that couples would be allowed to have a second child.


China launched in 1978 its severe “One-Child Family Policy” or “Policy of Birth Planning” which has since led to a fertility rate of 1.7 through the killing of the unborn and infants who are “unwanted,” because they are girls (female infanticide), or because they are second children. Contraceptive use is now a high 87% with a heavy reliance on sterilization. Abortions are often forced on women who are pregnant with their second child.


The result has been disastrous, not only from a human-rights viewpoint, but also from a demographics viewpoint. The elderly population will jump from 5% in 1982 to over 15% by 2025, thus requiring 70% of the elderly to be supported by their children, in the absence of government pension coverage. It’s called the “4-2-1” problem of one child financially and emotionally supporting his two parents and four grandparents. The phenomenon of the spoiled “only child” is breeding a generation called “little emperors.” Then there’s the gender imbalance: the ratio of Chinese males to females is estimated at 1.17:1 as opposed to the *** ratio of 1.03-1.07 in industrialized countries. All these consequences are causing concerns about the future of China.


Western countries have to extend their retirement age. The Economist is one of several publications calling the alert that “Current plans to raise the retirement age are not bold enough” to address the effect of declining population growth on the world economy:
source:Pensions: 70 or bust! | The Economist

The lesson here? Set up population programs and you will probably get (by hook or by crook, with the implementation tactics of abusive local government officials and medical practitioners), the result you asked for 25-30 years later – but by then you’ll realize that they’re not the results you wanted. You can’t just do a U-turn then!
All these lessons of history are being ignored. Instead, the Philippine legislators are still talking about population as a burden on the economy.

But it’s better to provide direct solutions to poverty: countryside development so that the cities are not congested, good education and training for entrepreneurship or technical skills, housing programs, a healthy investment climate that will create more jobs, and most of all, addressing corruption. What are our legislators doing about those needed solutions?
-------------------------article ends here.

again, i did not personally wrote this but i happen to see a point.
i also posted a link for the source of this article

personally, i agree with what the Bishop said that the main problem is not really overpopulation
but corruption and improper distribution of wealth and that the bill is just an easy way out
which could result to the things mentioned above.

[ramzness]

naanad rani ang mga pari naay daghan mo devotees mo donate para sa ilahang survival..

[gelsor]

@noy: noy, unsay kahimtang nimo karon? Bcn pwede pa cguro ka modungag ug mga anak noh? Or bacn inig panganak sa imong partner naa moy diamond member nga insurance? Kabalo baka pilay galastohan inig himugso sa isa ka bata? Bcn moingon ka naa may libre, ok rana...blah blah dapat gobyerno moatiman ana. Kabalo ka, maski ipangutana pana nimo didto sa squatter na daghan anak mismo dili cla ganahan anang kahimtanga. Pero unsaon man, dili man kalikayan ky eh educate pa matud nimo...ug usa na sa main purpose sa RH Bill.

Kamo nangita lang jud mog lusot nga iduot nasab ang gobyerno nga DILI ang overpopulation maoy problema? Tapos himan2 pwerte mo ka reklamador - traffic ang kalsada, dghan tawo mglinya bayad sa cashier, dghan pasahero sa jeep, alimoot ky dgahan tawo ang simbahan ug uban pang reklamo walag-tuo tapos gobyerno dayon basolon. Tan-awa gud kung dili ta overpopulated parehas sa mga countries imo gi example pwerte ka hamogaway ang services ug enjoy nila ang facilities...

Kaning problemaha ug ang solusyon alang gayod ni ug tumong sa mga POBRE (walay labot parehas ky bishop) - nga fertile kaau, nga dili baog ug nanobra ang membro sa pamilya nga galisod nalang pa-eskwela, mohunong ang duha ka anak haron mopadayon ang isa ka college - bacn moingon nasab ka gobyerno nasab! Pastilan jud ninyo klaro jud kaau dili mo good follower nga dili man gani mo kasunod sa simpleh na balaod dinhi sa yuta, adto na ba kaha sa balaod pra sa langit?