nope, its the same.Originally Posted by omar50071
@omar50071 .....tarungag pag sayaw do.hikhik
murag escudero ko ani kay mas gwapo..weeeeee
wahh.. duha namong SNMP! :POriginally Posted by noelkoi
Atong amigo sa pro GMA ba. Mao ni ila argument. Bahalag kawatan ug tikasan basta si GMA lang.
Wa ha ha ha ha ha.
Thanks satan for bringing her into the Presidency. You don't want the truth... coz the truth hurts. Hiding in so called "due process and constitution".!
NO.Â* Thank yourselves.Â* You do nothing but grandstand on a political issue that is totally irrational.
You want the truth?Â* Here's the truth.Â* It's the opposition who is concealing the truth.Â* Can you imagine picking only a few minutes of an alleged conversation that spanned hours?Â* Who's afraid of the truth now?Â* The reason why we get to hear only a portion of the alleged conversation is because the truth that the opposition is propagating is "customized" according to its own political tactics.
It is a cowardly act of thwarting the truth, the WHOLE truth, and nothing but the truth.Â* Â*Just like those people who try to convert you to their religion.Â* Â*They take quotes from the Bible but they cut certain portions of the passages.Â* Â*It may carry a different context but it is still Biblical.
Let's have the truth.Â* Lay every strand of truth on the table, and let's see who will be covered with dirt beyond recognition.Â* Â*Certainly, it will be the opposition.
Study the law before you make a stupid comment.Â* In this country, it is not the burden of the accused to prove that she didn't commit the allegation, rather, it is the burden of the accuser to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.Â* Now what?Â* From a banana republic, we turn into a monkey court?Â* Ayayay...But have you proven that GMA did not cheat? Hell NO.
for all you know it was the opposition who helped garci leave the country. nanawag baya si loren niya ug si escudero. it was known that lacson was behind sandra cam's testimonial and he was also known to be funding that priest who helps these so called whistle blowers.
We certainly need a president whose credibility is intact. Â*But questioning Arroyo's crediblity and failing to discount it (take note) does not diminish her credibility. Â* More so, if the party questioning it also has credibility issues. Â* Trust me, the president's accusers are no less rapacious as you claim GMA is. Â*And for a fact, they are willing to move heaven and earth to unseat Arroyo to satiate their esurient need for power. Â*
Why do you need anyone with a towering personality and great credibility to replace someone with an unscrupulous personality and an utter lack of credibility? The Palace gardener would be a better replacement. Or less than the Palace gardener, Estrada himself. As I said before this country will always be far safer with a president who won the elections and stole afterward than one who stole the elections to begin with. There will always be limits to the rapacity of the first, there will be none to that of the second.
No, the palace gardener is not a good replacement for Arroyo. Â*We should replace GMA with the palace cook if that's what you are saying. Â*At least the palace cook is so used to the grilling, the cooking, the boiling, the brewing and the endless heat in the kitchen for I'm sure, whoever is in that presidential seat will be subjected to the same unforgiving, malicious, unscrupulous wrath of the ravenous opposition.
Don' t even dare to discount the issue. Â*Robbers are robbers, no matter what and when they steal. Â* It doesn't make any difference. Â* The only thing that matters is--one is merely accused; the other one is guilty. Â*Get it?
@purple_rain
me grandstanding? do you think i'm a congressman or a leftist?You do nothing but grandstand on a political issue that is totally irrational.
and you call this political issue an irrational one? If you are not one of GMAs people or official... it's sad to note that you see this issue as an irrational one. tsk... tsk... tsk...
That's there should be an impeachment, so that the whole conversation will come out... but oh well your GMA is also afraid of the truth... If the opposition is afraid of the truth so is your GMA.You want the truth?Â* Here's the truth.Â* It's the opposition who is concealing the truth.Â* Can you imagine picking only a few minutes of an alleged conversation that spanned hours?Â* Who's afraid of the truth now?Â* The reason why we get to hear only a portion of the alleged conversation is because the truth that the opposition is propagating is "customized" according to its own political tactics.
Wether it's customized or not... does it prove that GMA did not call Garci and asked him to fix the votes? don't think so...
Yeah... let's do that i don't care if the opposition will be covered beyond recognition.Â* But as I say... GMA is also afraid of the truth?Let's have the truth.Â* Lay every strand of truth on the table, and let's see who will be covered with dirt beyond recognition.Â* Â*Certainly, it will be the opposition.
All I say is let all public officials be accountable.
In the courts yeah... but we as the public has his/her own public opinion.Â* I guess ERAP was not convicted yet right?Â* But why is he thrown out of the office?Â* Because the public have judge him guilty.Â* You call it Banana Republic?Â* Yeah GMA is the president of the Banana Republic.In this country, it is not the burden of the accused to prove that she didn't commit the allegation, rather, it is the burden of the accuser to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.
mao ba? How did do that and why?Â* What a nice conspiracy theory you got there... CRAPfor all you know it was the opposition who helped garci leave the country. nanawag baya si loren niya ug si escudero.
If the opposition is in control of Garci... they could have just instructed him just like Zuce, nga i-sabit si GMA nga nanikas jud silang duha.
and GMA is willing to move Hell and Heaven together just to stay in power.And for a fact, they are willing to move heaven and earth to unseat Arroyo to satiate their esurient need for power.
yeah you are right... robbers are robbers... cheaters are cheaters... now who was/is guilty?Don' t even dare to discount the issue.Â* Robbers are robbers, no matter what and when they steal.Â* Â*It doesn't make any difference.Â* Â*The only thing that matters is--one is merely accused; the other one is guilty.Â* Get it?
Are you willing to convince me that GMA is not guilty?
Similar Threads |
|