What's wrong with HB 3773? A LOT!!! (New Online Petitions added!)

[goodsamaritan]

---

Population Control, Contraception is War: Review of Kingdom of Heaven

My wife and I just watched the Kingdom of Heaven.
The movie starts in the year 1134 AD.
Christendom has ruled Jerusalem for 100 years.
The turning point at the hand of Salahudin comes.
Cinematic war ensues. Close combat sword fights galore.
Where only real men sacrificed their lives so that their women and children may live.
Real men fight to ensure the future of their descendants.
Orlando Bloom is the stubborn baron who makes the last stand against the invading Muslims.
The movie ends saying peace is still elusive in that region.

--------------------
That is a thousand years of war.
This movie serves as a reminder to the complacent:
It is not always peace time.
And what seems to be peacetime is always war time.

A few days ago, free contraceptive patches were given out to my wife's office.
That is the war right there. Right HERE. Right NOW.

Population Control is WAR.
I must remember to look for that picture my wife had with Henry Kissinger.
The master plan writer of NSSM 200.
The once classified plan of the US Government to sow a Contraceptive War on its enemies and potential hot spots.
This now declassified document specifically mentions the Philippines as one of those countries to be Contraceptivized to stunt development so its natural resources may be made available to the USA instead of its own people.

This contraceptive war has been waged upon us for more than 40 years now.
This war is fought in the media, in schools, in the medical community, in your government which has received billions of pesos in contraceptive development aid for many many years.
This war is waged on the more gullible people of our society. Mostly women.
Women are forced into the workforce.
Given all the career opportunities.
Given all the funding for small business.
Given all the mis-education in Family Planning with the purpose of "Empowering" them.
They are sold the lie about Patriarchy and that Motherhood is Disempowering.
Housewifery is likened to slavery and disempowerment.

All this effort going behind the backs of our men.
Our women are attacked at the rear.
Our marriages ruined.
Our families lost.
Our descendants contraceptivized to oblivion.
Many of you will have no multigenerational future.

We have always been at WAR.
Now you know.

[mannyamador]

[img]---http://www.phnix.net/childnotchoice.jpg---[/img]

mod's comment: reduce this picture please.

[mannyamador]

[mannyamador]

Death's Wages: Population Disaster
By Joseph A. D’Agostino
http://www.catholicexchange.com/vm/i...1&art_id=28493

At his press conference April 28, President Bush used some statistics to demonstrate the need for his Social Security reform plan. "There's a lot of us getting ready to retire who will be living longer and receiving greater benefits than the previous generation," he said.

And then he added, "And to compound the problem, there are fewer people paying into the system. In 1950, there were 16 workers for every beneficiary; today there are 3.3 workers for every beneficiary; soon there will be two workers for every beneficiary. These changes have put Social Security on the path to bankruptcy."

Forty years of contraception, abortion, feminism, and two-income or one-parent families have taken their toll. The 105-page Highlights of the United Nations Population Division's World Population Prospects: The 2004 Revision outlines the demographic crisis overtaking the world, not just the United States and her collapsing Social Security system.

It's very simple to state: People aren't having enough children to sustain the long-term economic prosperity of the world or most of its individual countries. In many cases, particularly in Western Europe and Japan, they aren't having enough children to ensure the survival of their national cultures — perhaps not even their nations — into the next century. Pension and health care systems will just be the first things to break down.

Experts have been predicting dire consequences of world "overpopulation" for two centuries now, and they have never come true. Now, after decades of population control, family planning, feminism, and anti-family economic realignment, rapidly declining fertility levels will inevitably produce demographic disaster due to the opposite problem.

UNPD has revised its prediction for the world's population in 2050 down to 9.1 billion from the 9.3 billion by 2050 it predicted in its 2000 revision. The world will hit 6.5 billion some time in July of this year.

UNPD has tended to be candid about the world's coming underpopulation and aging crises in recent years, and indications are that new UNPD Director Hania Zlotnik will continue this high-quality devotion to science. But UNPD does continue to cling to at least one unrealistic assumption. The new medium variant projection counts on fertility rates rising in developed countries even though there is no reason to think that they will. Says the report:

In developed countries as a whole, fertility is currently 1.56 children per woman and is projected to increase slowly to 1.84 children per woman in 2045-2050. In the least developed countries, fertility is 5 children per woman and is expected to drop by about half, to 2.57 children per woman by 2045-2050. In the rest of the developing world, fertility is already moderately low at 2.58 children per woman and is expected to decline further to 1.92 children per woman by mid-century, thus nearly converging to the fertility levels by then typical of the developed world.

Replacement rate fertility is 2.1 children per woman in the absence of major wars, famine, and epidemic.

What justification does UNPD have in saying that fertility levels will rise in developed countries? Perhaps the agency believes that large-scale immigration into Western Europe will continue, and that these immigrants will have so many children that they will raise greatly the total fertility rate of the entire developed world. UNPD projects a net migration of about 73 million people into wealthier countries: "Because deaths are projected to exceed births in the more developed regions by 73 million during 2005-2050, population growth in those regions will largely be due to international migration." The immigration projections may be less than some might expect, but remember that fertility rates are dropping fast in the developing world, too — and the backlash against large-scale immigration is growing in Western Europe and the United States.

In any case, UNPD doesn't say. It says it just assumes that fertility rates everywhere will converge on the number 1.85: "Total fertility in all countries is assumed to converge eventually toward a level of 1.85 children per woman. However, not all countries reach this level during the projection period, that is, by 2050." It's hard to foresee social changes in developed countries that will lead to such a dramatic turnaround in fertility by 2050.

UNPD predicts that population growth in the developed world has come almost completely to a standstill: "Almost all growth will take place in the less developed regions, where today's 5.3 billion population is expected to swell to 7.8 billion in 2050. By contrast, the population of the more developed regions will remain mostly unchanged, at 1.2 billion."

Developed countries' combined population will remain stable as immigrants flood in to replace the native populations that are dying off. And dying off they are: "Fertility levels in the 44 developed countries, which account for 19% of the world population, are currently very low. All except Albania have fertility below-replacement level and 15, mostly located in Southern and Eastern Europe, have reached levels of fertility unprecedented in human history (below 1.3 children per woman)." Majority Muslim Albania is the only developed country whose people care enough about their future to procreate their descendents.

A few developed countries have seen some fertility rate increases over the past 10-15 years, but not enough to raise them above replacement level. "Since 1990-1995, fertility decline has been the rule among most developed countries," says UNPD. "The few increases recorded, such as those in Belgium, France, Germany, Netherlands and the United States, have been small."

UNPD's low variant projection, which historically is more accurate than the medium variant projection that it holds out as most likely to be right, estimates a world population of only 7.7 billion by 2050, due to an estimated total fertility rate 0.5 child less than the projection used in the medium variant. The developed world will drop to less than 1.1 billion people in that time.

Regardless of what happens in total numbers, dramatic aging of the world's population, particularly in the developed world, will certainly occur. Even taking UNPD's higher medium variant numbers, "The primary consequence of fertility decline, especially if combined with increases in life expectancy, is population aging, whereby the share of older persons in a population increases relative to that of younger persons," reports UNPD.

"Globally, the number of persons aged 60 years or over is expected almost to triple, increasing from 672 million in 2005 to nearly 1.9 billion by 2050. Whereas 6 out of every 10 of those older persons live today in developing countries, by 2050, 8 out of every 10 will do so. An even more marked increase is expected in the number of the oldest-old (persons aged 80 years or over): from 86 million in 2005 to 394 million in 2050. In developing countries, the rise will be from 42 million to 278 million, indicating that by 2050 most oldest-old will live in the developing world."

The percentages don't look good, either. "In developed countries, 20% of today's population is aged 60 years or over, and by 2050 that proportion is projected to be 32%," says UNPD. "The elderly population in developed countries has already surpassed the number of children (persons aged 0-14), and by 2050 there will be two elderly persons for every child. In the developing world, the proportion of the population aged 60 or over is expected to rise from 8% in 2005 to close to 20% by 2050."

Where will the money to support all these elderly people come from? Who will pay the rapidly rising health care costs, for example? The problem in the United States, which is much better off fiscally than almost any other nation due to its relatively high fertility rate and excellent economy, is only a fraction of that faced by other nations. Mass euthanasia of the old and all those unable to work — "useless eaters," in the Nazis' phrase — could become the world norm.

The wages of birth control, abortion, and feminism are death.


Joseph A. D’Agostino is Vice President for Communications at the Population Research Institute, a non-profit organization dedicated to debunking the myth that the world is overpopulated.

[mannyamador]

[darkwing]

we have a bigger problem in the pending VAT bill, 10% more on power and fuel = 100% more headaches, heck even contraceptives would cost more lol

[mannyamador]

we have a bigger problem in the pending VAT bill

The VAT bill is wrong too. It's not a bigger problem than the culture of death, but yes, it IS a big problem.

[mannyamador]

[mannyamador]

UN Admits that Access to Abortion Not Effective at Reducing Maternal Mortality
http://www.c-fam.org/

Earlier this month, the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) released
its annual report on maternal mortality around the world. The report shows
that the most important means of reducing maternal mortality is the
presence of a skilled birth attendant with access to adequate emergency
obstetrical care. The report contradicts UNFPA's earlier strategy of
focusing on access to contraceptives and legalized abortion as the main
means of reducing maternal mortality.

The report, entitled "Maternal Mortality Update 2004: Delivering Into Good
Hands," states that some 529,000 women died in 2000 as a result of
complications in pregnancy and childbirth, with 95 percent of deaths
occurring in Africa and Asia. Only 2,500 maternal deaths occurred in
developed countries, where the risk of maternal death is one in 2,800,
compared to one in 16 in sub-Saharan Africa.

The report acknowledges that "almost all maternal mortality is avoidable,"
because "all five of the most life-threatening complications can be
treated by a professional health worker." Thus, "We know that efficient
emergency interventions for complications are key to saving women's
lives."

Dr. George Mulcaire-Jones of Maternal Life International, an international
provider of maternal health care, says that the report "largely validates
what the pro-life community has said all along: that reducing maternal
deaths comes down to the kind of skilled obstetrical care given women --
adequate training and clean, well-supplied birthing facilities -- and has
little to do with introducing notions of reproductive rights."

Yet the report states that alongside the provision of emergency obstetric
care and birth attendants, UNFPA's "three-pronged strategy" of reducing
maternal mortality focuses on "contraceptive services to prevent unwanted
pregnancy." A "rights-based approach" to maternal mortality, which
"promotes the empowerment of women," continues to "guide the design and
implementation of UNFPA's maternal mortality policy and programming."

According to Mulcaire-Jones, UNFPA's "three-pronged strategy is flawed at
the outset," because UNFPA channels the bulk of its funding into
contraception. "Contraceptive services should be separated from maternal
health and obstetrical services both in terms of funding, accounting, and
program implementation. Only in this way will skilled care and safe, clean
and well-supplied health facilities receive the attention and funding
required to meaningfully reduce maternal death."

Mulcaire-Jones also stated that UNFPA's "rights-based approach" is flawed
for lack of "universal acknowledgment of the most fundamental right of all
the right to life . . . UNFPA's stated policies in support of abortion
immediately create a conflict of rights by negating the right to life of
unborn children."

Copyright 2005 - C-FAM (Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute).
Permission granted for unlimited use. Credit required.

[darkwing]

jueteng is more important......now, look at headlines, next thing you know, Noli is our president harharhar