MERGED: All about Anti-Cybercrime Law, related issues and developments

[cliff_drew]

---

Though I do not agree on what these hackers did to our government websites, its a way of protest without the need of walking out the streets. Damage to property, yes, but not really disruption of its operation. These are not even e-commerce or banking sites. I bet nobody from the government knew what happened not unless the media exposed it.

“Disagreeing with certain sections of the law or questioning the legislative intent is no excuse to commit crimes—defacing websites whether government or not, disrupting essential operations and services, and causing damage to scarce resources,” De Lima said.

[jdbebz]

hahahah maayu unta naay free wifi padayun ang mudos unya ma trace nga ikaw gehapon ang nag post ug retwit

prisohon gehapon ka nga ge priso naman ka

[lestat1116]

will wait for the next attack. its like de lima telling the hackers walay ra na inyo gi buhat.

[chang3]

they start attacking now . . operation philippines

[Pricklypet]

og bata ang ni post sa comment nya wa ka uyon ang iya g sulti.an..
Mah kiha ang bata? Mah priso? luoy xd.. Of all the untreated wounds this country has suffered for years and years now, they gave this allot of priority into passing it.. whats next? We pay for every step we take?

[junax422208]

Kini palang unta ang unahon nato ug solve... Everybody happy unta...




Dili raba ko kama-o mo sayaw... saon nalang ni...

[stjohnmedrano]

Wala na! nag tulod2x na ang mga lawmakers nato!

Lawmaker blames Aquino for

[jangska]

daghan lungag ning balaora..

[amazingboy109]

This law violates a lot of existing laws.

[æRLO]

Overreacting lang uban nga naa'y LIBEL clause naka butang sa Cybercrime Act , peligro na ma priso kung mo criticize ka ug usa ka individual especially a gov't official . I don't think nga kasohan ka kung constructive lang imo criticism dili pana-ot like e mention ang ila personal life , bold accusation with weak evidence , sungoggon like mentioning ila body-type , intelligence , and etc . Parehas lang gud ato ni "Wild Barney" nga instead e criticize nato ang iya sayop , naa nay nag post ug death threats , ihawon , asta gidamay ang pamilya ug friends ... kana lang nga example , technically grounds for LIBEL na .

Kung edukado ang taw , kahibaw na unta mo ana before na introduced ning Cybercrime Law .

um, libel is libel. You can be as constructive as you can, if you are making an allegation and it is found to be groundless in court, wala jud ka. The Philippines justice system is already as inadequate as it is, it will be even more burdened handling such complex crimes as libel. Death threats are not considered libel, it is coercion. As a matter of fact, and this is not a stretch, people who posted in this thread could file libel against you for your last sentence--merely for one condescending or demeaning remark. To the most technical sense, that is the effect of the law.

Kung edukado ang taw, kahibaw na unta mo ana before na introduced ning Cybercrime Law .