Evolution is now A FACT OF LIFE

[brownprose]

---

Behe's claim had long been debunked by the scientific community for arguing from ignorance .

Even the university (Lehigh University) where he serves as a professor even disowns his works: “While we respect Prof. Behe's right to express his views, they are his alone and are in no way endorsed by the department. It is our collective position that intelligent design has no basis in science, has not been tested experimentally and should not be regarded as scientific." (Source: Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University. Lehigh University Department of Biological Sciences. Retrieved 2008-07-25.)

It is also quite strange for a highly credentialed biochemist to refuse a peer-review of his findings when it is a praxis or custom for all scientific claims to be peer-reviewed. Could it be that he's wrong or is he simply lying?

His book has been sold to the public but is not taken seriously by the scientific community for lack of merit and scientific substance.

Have you read the book Darwin Black Box? You should read it...

Darwin's Black Box: Irreducible Complexity or Irreproducible Irreducibility?

"It may appear to have loose ends to the outsiders( non-scienctists ) but not to those who studied the necessary data and had applied the correct system."

Michael J. Behe (born 1952) is an American biochemist. He currently serves as professor of biochemistry at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania and as a senior fellow of the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture

-an intelligent design advocate

[bluedes]

Behe's claim had long been debunked by the scientific community for arguing from ignorance .

Even the university (Lehigh University) where he serves as a professor even disowns his works: “While we respect Prof. Behe's right to express his views, they are his alone and are in no way endorsed by the department. It is our collective position that intelligent design has no basis in science, has not been tested experimentally and should not be regarded as scientific." (Source: Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University. Lehigh University Department of Biological Sciences. Retrieved 2008-07-25.)

It is also quite strange for a highly credentialed biochemist to refuse a peer-review of his findings when it is a praxis or custom for all scientific claims to be peer-reviewed. Could it be that he's wrong or is he simply lying?

His book has been sold to the public but is not taken seriously by the scientific community for lack of merit and scientific substance.

pakshyet.. murag parehas ra ni ni Hovind tingale..

[Pein]

asa raman lagi ang link nga mag connect sa usa ka organism sa iyang ancestor? asa raman na?

[nikxz unÖ]

Originally Posted by brownprose

Behe's claim had long been debunked by the scientific community for arguing from ignorance .

Even the university (Lehigh University) where he serves as a professor even disowns his works: “While we respect Prof. Behe's right to express his views, they are his alone and are in no way endorsed by the department. It is our collective position that intelligent design has no basis in science, has not been tested experimentally and should not be regarded as scientific." (Source: Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University. Lehigh University Department of Biological Sciences. Retrieved 2008-07-25.)

It is also quite strange for a highly credentialed biochemist to refuse a peer-review of his findings when it is a praxis or custom for all scientific claims to be peer-reviewed. Could it be that he's wrong or is he simply lying?

His book has been sold to the public but is not taken seriously by the scientific community for lack of merit and scientific substance.

Ouch

[PhilAcre]

asa raman lagi ang link nga mag connect sa usa ka organism sa iyang ancestor? asa raman na?

Suggest you read Evolution 101. Welcome to Evolution 101! naa diha tubag tanan sa imong pangutana sir pien.

Nindot ni sir kay naay illustrations mas sayon sabton.

[Pein]

Suggest you read Evolution 101. Welcome to Evolution 101! naa diha tubag tanan sa imong pangutana sir pien.

Nindot ni sir kay naay illustrations mas sayon sabton.

hahay nabasahan nana nako oi...ang link asa ra?

[kebotDiNaMute]

Behe's claim had long been debunked by the scientific community for arguing from ignorance .

Even the university (Lehigh University) where he serves as a professor even disowns his works: “While we respect Prof. Behe's right to express his views, they are his alone and are in no way endorsed by the department. It is our collective position that intelligent design has no basis in science, has not been tested experimentally and should not be regarded as scientific." (Source: Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University. Lehigh University Department of Biological Sciences. Retrieved 2008-07-25.)

It is also quite strange for a highly credentialed biochemist to refuse a peer-review of his findings when it is a praxis or custom for all scientific claims to be peer-reviewed. Could it be that he's wrong or is he simply lying?

His book has been sold to the public but is not taken seriously by the scientific community for lack of merit and scientific substance.

bro dont copy paste post the source... so we can see the whole picture... to me the one you posted are not conclusive yet, you gave your conclusion on the matter... tsk tsk tsk...

[brownprose]

bro dont copy paste post the source... so we can see the whole picture... to me the one you posted are not conclusive yet, you gave your conclusion on the matter... tsk tsk tsk...

What's wrong with copy-pasting facts? Besides, that's not my conclusion. I am not making up my own conclusion kebs. I am not even authorized to make one. That conclusion is the conclusion of the rest of the scientific community. The conclusion of the university where Behe works is not also mine - it is the conclusion of the university. I placed a quotation mark to say that it didn't come from me and to repeat the position of Lehigh University: “While we respect Prof. Behe's right to express his views, they are his alone and are in no way endorsed by the department. It is our collective position that intelligent design has no basis in science, has not been tested experimentally and should not be regarded as scientific." source: Lehigh University Department of Biological Sciences

[brownprose]

hahay nabasahan nana nako oi...ang link asa ra?

Basin wa tingali ka mobasa pien atong link gihatag atong philacre or kung nibasa ka basin wa lang ka kasabot.

[kebotDiNaMute]

Suggest you read Evolution 101. Welcome to Evolution 101! naa diha tubag tanan sa imong pangutana sir pien.

Nindot ni sir kay naay illustrations mas sayon sabton.

Bro, the story is nice... but here are some notes you might want to consult with...

Misconceptions about humans
Trees, not ladders
Humans are not "higher" or "more evolved" than other living lineages. Since our lineages split,
humans and chimpanzees have each evolved traits unique to their own lineages.
--- hmmm i don't know what this website mean, but you are at the same level as chimpz... nothing special between you and chimpz... hahaha, gud luck. Im sure mo 2o pod mo ani mga evolutionist... dba?

Kani nndot sad ang STORY.

tinood ni? hahaha! ka alegre.

How we know what happened when
1. Radiometric dating
--- HIGH MARGIN OF ERROR
WikiAnswers - Radiometric dating is used to find the ages of various substances. What assumptions are necessary for this to be useful and reasonably accurate

2. Stratigraphy
--- SpringerLink - Journal Article

3. Molecular clocks
Yet the majority of such timescales are based on point estimates using fossils or the molecular clock.
Calibration and error in placental molecular clocks: a conservative approach using the cet

Mechanisms of change
Mechanisms of change
--- still the same they are still beetle. Producing the same KIND. yet they use it to validate that this change can produce PRINCE... hahahah!