you quote me...
this is then your response...Originally Posted by LightBearer
you can check it, refer to post#36Originally Posted by karwren
you quote me...
this is then your response...Originally Posted by LightBearer
you can check it, refer to post#36Originally Posted by karwren
lahi naman pod ni kay ang previous nga discussion is about sa imong pag quote sa phrase "wages of sin" nga naa sa Romans 6:23 to mean nga gibayran ni Jesus ang atong sala pinaagi sa iyang kamatayon. Well yes gi bayran niya but to use Romans 6:23 to support your idea is unfit kay sama na sa akong gi ingon ang WAGES of SIN, ang pasabot ato didto is katong Sala ni Adam, ang WAGES ato is Death.
osbon nako para klaro sir, nigamit ka sa phrase nga WAGES of SIN to support the idea of Jesus paid our sins through his death,di ba? nya ingon ko nga dili na siya fit nga verse gamiton for that idea kay ang pasabot sa WAGES of SIN sa Romans is katong Sala nga na commit ni Adam nga napasa sa tao, ang bayad ato is DEATH, mao na ang pasabot sa Romans 6:23-- for the WAGES of SIN is DEATH and not to support the idea nga gibayran ni Jesus atong sala pinaagi sa iyang kamatayon.
kanang naa sa taas which is Romans 3:23 dili man na siya mao atong gi discuss.
So for the million of jews killed during second world war, you could say that it is just a cause of illusion and is also because of the false self........I could not discern any rationality...sorry..
such a notion is so biased in nature, perhaps siding towards evil...
I think man in it's essence is already complete, either he misused his completeness in doing evil deeds or more ideally use it in benefit for all humanity.....there is no more evolution involved...
Ignorance is different when the deed is intentional.............
alibi maybe it would tend to appear........
mao na ang context sa mga verses up till Romans 6:23-For the wages of sin is death...
tan-awa ingon diha is SIN singular not plural...so it refers to the Sin of Adam and Eve passed down to all his children.
so again sayop si kebotDiNaMute sa iyang pasabot nga kini daw Wages of Sin means nga mao daw ng gibayran pinaagi sa kamatayon ni Jesus ang atong sala kay ang wage sa sin is death.
then ni quote siya sa romans 3:23 which does not support his idea.
the problem of Hitler going to heaven and all, and where hell is really just an illusion, is a problem of justice. Even Karma(n) runs with the universal doctrine of justice called Rta. Because christianity does not hold on to the belief of a circle of life, that it presents heaven and hell - an eschatology - not merely as a superficial lore or superstition or as cultural symbol, but also to insure us that when justice is not serve in this world, (politics et al) then justice will be serve in the afterlife.
No one kills for the sake of killing, right? or else that man is insane or crazy.![]()
So, How do you attribute man's negative behavior objectively?
I want you to study ATTRIBUTION THEORY and know why man kills or else you will just reason out that man is evil or does not believe in GOD thats why he kills and commits crime.
There is always evolution while we are here. As Jesus said, "Be perfect (through evolution) as your heavenly father is perfect."
Last edited by regnauld; 12-28-2009 at 08:46 PM.
I think when somebody kills, we call him a criminal.....a person liable to his doings....
It is of man's essence that he is capable of doing evil deeds, not because his evolution process is not complete but because that is what he really is......
I don't need any theory to distinguish what is bad or good nor what is righteous and evil, you can even see it practically..........
Matthew 5:48
Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.
Yup, I agree, but no evolution involved, the requirements is only to follow...........
Similar Threads |
|