Bible Contradictions, Errors: Bible is Full of Contradictions & Errors

[Hellblazer 2.1]

you almost have the answer my friend actually those contracting verses are not really CONTRADICTING with each other there are reasons why it was written like that..

they may look contradicting but the verses in the bible are like ONE strangled string but looked like many strangled strings, but actually usa ra ang string nga nastrangled...

you just need to solve it...

like the Gordian Knot? you have a nice interpretation. but you see, the bible is just a compilation. a compilation of different literary works written by different persons with different points of view and different historical timelines. it may not be a contradiction in itself (a scripture standing alone), but the fact that it was compiled and branded as the Word of God will result to different contradictions among certain scriptures.

[dartzed]

You mean the bible is like a great detective book?

i dont know what your pointing at but to be serious does the scripture look like a detective book to you?..

[regnauld]

actually in my points who releof view RC was the one who released the Bilble so pasabot any changes or missing or nausab nga imo makita sa uban bible means not true..

if thats the case well i hate to say this but they change the real scripture..

sorry though...

so, what's the real scripture looked like? who changed really the bible?

[dartzed]

like the Gordian Knot? you have a nice interpretation. but you see, the bible is just a compilation. a compilation of different literary works written by different persons with different points of view and different historical timelines. it may not be a contradiction in itself (a scripture standing alone), but the fact that it was compiled and branded as the Word of God will result to different contradictions among certain scriptures.

yup MAYBE thats what the church also thought about it but sa ila kadugay na ug study sa bible it turned out to be not contradicting.

those verses i gave were very important verses to prove some points of the wrong accusations protestants throw to the RCs..

at 1st i thought it was also contradicting..

[Hellblazer 2.1]

so, what's the real scripture looked like? who changed really the bible?

ask bishop irenaeus, mr. regnauld.

[regnauld]

Yo

yup MAYBE thats what the church also thought about it but sa ila kadugay na ug study sa bible it turned out to be not contradicting.

those verses i gave were very important verses to prove some points of the wrong accusations protestants throw to the RCs..

at 1st i thought it was also contradicting..

Di ba RC do not depend entirely on the scripture but also on the tradition of the apostles?

[dartzed]

so, what's the real scripture looked like? who changed really the bible?

hahaha wa dai ka kitag biblia bro?... based sa ako statements you can see unsa ug asa ang tinuod nga scripture..

for now many were claiming ila doctrina ang sakto but kung imo itandi ila doctrine lain-lain ang naa sa sulod...

[dartzed]

Yo

Di ba RC do not depend entirely on the scripture but also on the tradition of the apostles?

once you practice something written in the bible and then pass it to your successor it will become tradition...

now question kinsa may wala nagbuhata ana?...

[regnauld]

hahaha wa dai ka kitag biblia bro?... based sa ako statements you can see unsa ug asa ang tinuod nga scripture..

for now many were claiming ila doctrina ang sakto but kung imo itandi ila doctrine lain-lain ang naa sa sulod...

kita man bro. so, which is more reliable the king james version or the jerusalem bible?

[reishoto]

nothing actually changed in its very sense, not necessarily the meaning. u see, protestants and other religion seem to interpret it from the original verses to english (or other languages) as what the interpreters would understand and whats not to be inclded in the interpretation. say, protestants took out books from old testaments, as they claimed where not "inspired" by God. this is the word here, INSPIRED. God directly is not the bible maker, but indirectly its creator. but humans are limited in terms of undertsanding God, so he has to make it in verses in its deepest ability to convey his messages. the error does not come from tangled pieces, but rather not getting the whole meaning of it. Whole, not part. so dont quote the bible in verses, but rather in its whole addressed topic.

again... pathetic...