pacman vs diaz nice.. lain na pud..
pakito?Originally Posted by wapaytuli
comment lang ha.. mas ok jud if musaka na si pacman kai naglisud na cya sa 130lbs. barrera ang marquez, he cant merely knockdown his opponent... lets not push packyaw to its limit..luoy sab oi.. sometimes we pilipino must down our pride..
agree ko nimo bro time nasad ni pacman demand unsa iya gusto. gusto sya ni ara ok.. toinks he he
Here's an article I read from sunstar which is about how a judge scored each round of the fight.
http://www.sunstar.com.ph/static/ceb...ge.speaks.html
From the article, it is clear to me now how they break the tie of each round.
“So this was changed to the 10-point must system. This meant that judges had to look for a winner in each round. The winner gets 10 points; the loser, nine points. When a knockdown occurs, that’s 10-8. When a boxer is knocked-down twice, that’s 10-7. Thrice, 10-6. That’s why in the first Pacquiao-Marquez fight, one judge made a mistake (while the two others were correct) when he scored that first round 10-7. Because Pacquiao knocked Marquez down thrice, the score should have been 10-6.”
How do you score, I asked Jonathan.
“To be honest,” he said, “we don’t enjoy the fight as much as the spectators. Why? Because as a judge, you cannot root for your fighter. While it is natural for a spectator to look at one’s fighter more, we can’t do that. We look in the middle. And mentally, we count the punches landed. If it’s a tie at the end of the round, before the referee circles around, we think back on who hit the harder blows.”
So that means in their scorecard, you will never see a 10-10 score. Hibong lang ko sa pikas forum na gi balik2 niya daw ug tan-aw ang fight unya daug jud daw marquez sa score na 115-112, pero iya score kay naa 10-10.
Pacquiao should get more than GBP's offer of $6M. That's only 500,000 more than what he got in their 2nd fight..Originally Posted by prakx
C'mon guys Pac won that fight. It was tightly fought and anyone could have won. Both gladiators deserved to win. It's the judges call and saw it RINGSIDE that Pac was clearly more deserving and has the x-factor to win that fight. That's why there are judges to do that just like in any other sports.
I'm just pissed on how badly RECAH TRINIDAD reported on how the hell Pac won that fight. He said a lot of how UNWORTHY Pac of that new WBC title, how Pac badly performed but praising all Marquez had done, etc. He even went to the extent that the fight should be seriously investigated coz maybe there were anomalies involved! C'mon Mr. Trinidad, Pac doesn't deserve that! What are you thinking! Bsin ni sugal kang Marquez nya napilde ka that's why you are sour-graping. I know RECAH can say all that he wants on his columns and interviews, but what the hell. I can also freely say my opinions about his write-ups and columns, and I say it's full of crap and non-sense!
pac deserves $10mOriginally Posted by nitro_boy
sakto ka bro.Originally Posted by macro_shot
basin naka pusta gyud to siya ni marquez then dakug pildi ba. ahehehe.
pacman deserves to win that fight. even sa first fight palang nila, sa featherweight pa, dapat daug na si pacman ato.
pacman ang nagdala sa fight. si marquez tira binta ang style. dili siya pang champion nga moves. hehe.
yes naa mga igo sad si marquez, pero kung solid punch ang hisgutan, mag daghan na land si pacman. tikayhang man gani na igo sa left ni pacman. ahaha. ang ulo ni marquez na bunal gyud sa canvas, ahehe. na wala siya sa kalibutan ato mga pila ka seconds. ahehe.
Similar Threads |
|