Originally Posted by
Sol_Itaire
lose face? someone who resorts to generalizations ought to feel that way. mao bitaw mangayo tag survey results para based on facts atong mga claims. if tinuod na siya based on studies then fine. pero kung wala gani basihan, or pipila lang ka kaso gibasihan, di na siya angay.
so kinsa man diay ron ang nag generalize nato. What I am trying to say is it may not be the norm in the industry but could be some isolated case. Read back my post carefully. Ug moingon ka nga wala na sa industry, that is too generalized kay that's what you are trying to portray here. We are talking about facts here kay naay ni presentar nga naa kuno na. So be it. Nganong nasakit man ka ug maayo ana. LIke I said dili tanan kay pipila ra na sila kabuok diha. Only a few who would probably taint the good morals of the people in the industry. But the fact still remains nga naa na unless nalang ang ni presentar mo recant sa iyang statements. Nagtoo na lang gyud diay ka nga tanan sa survey tinuod? Surveys can be cooked my friend.
bro, nganong mag mention man ka og "defense mechanism" nga di man ni reaction kay taga call center mi. di ko taga call center, naka trabaho ra ko didto og balig 2 ka buwan. this is a reaction to the way the journalist wrote it. murag dinalian pagkasulat.
Kanus-a man kuno ko nag mention ug defense mechanism? I am just trying to ease out the tension here kay para nako sayo pa kaayo nga i-criticize si Mongaya. You may take my advice or not. He may have acted haphazardly and I can understand the passion here. So why not cool off a little bit. I am just encouraging people to be passive in the meantime the police is continuing their investigation.
the more people will say call center agents engage in group ***, the more gyud ko mo ingon nga journalists are adulterous. nonsense for nonsense.
Well, that is your prerogative. Enjoy democracy.