EVERYTHING about ANGELO REYES

[*sludge*]

---

^^ ug kung pananglit dli siya nagpakamatay? gi unsa man pud pag assasinate?

[bearish]

ug nitingog na gajud si trillanes. klaro ug tataw ddaw kaajo nga dili to si reyes ang nagpakamatay.
naay punto si trillanes.

kuyawa gud ani, reyes impostor tingale diay to.

[THE SKULLS]

misleading kaayo ang news. "Trillanes: It ain't Reyes"

[PaYaSo]

late na kau c trillanes. patay na c reyes

[greengreen]

Please check on this link:

ZENIT - Funeral Masses for a Suicide

You can also read on the article below by by Father Edward McNamara, professor of liturgy at the Regina Apostolorum Pontifical University.

Funeral Masses for a Suicide

ROME, NOV. 15, 2005 (Zenit.org).- Answered by Father Edward McNamara, professor of liturgy at the Regina Apostolorum Pontifical University.

Q: What is the current stand of the Church regarding the possibility of funeral Masses "in corpore presente" of persons who are said to have committed suicide? Is it true that there already are mitigating circumstances, like the possibility of irrationality at the moment of taking one's life (even if there was no note), whereby it would be possible to suppose that the person was not in his right mind, and that therefore it is licit to let the funeral entourage to enter a church and a funeral Mass be said? -- E.C.M., Manila, Philippines

A: In earlier times a person who committed suicide would often be denied funeral rites and even burial in a Church cemetery. However, some consideration has always been taken into account of the person's mental state at the time.

In one famous case, when Rudolph, the heir to the throne of the Austrian-Hungarian Empire, committed suicide in 1889, the medical bulletin declared evidence of "mental aberrations" so that Pope Leo XIII would grant a religious funeral and burial in the imperial crypt. Other similar concessions were probably quietly made in less sonorous cases.

Canon law no longer specifically mentions suicide as an impediment to funeral rites or religious sepulture.

Canon 1184 mentions only three cases: a notorious apostate, heretic or schismatic; those who requested cremation for motives contrary to the Christian faith; and manifest sinners to whom a Church funeral cannot be granted without causing public scandal to the faithful. These restrictions apply only if there has been no sign of repentance before death.

The local bishop weighs any doubtful cases and in practice a prudent priest should always consult with the bishop before denying a funeral Mass.

A particular case of suicide might enter into the third case -- that of a manifest and unrepentant sinner -- especially if the suicide follows another grave crime such as murder.

In most cases, however, the progress made in the study of the underlying causes of self-destruction shows that the vast majority are consequences of an accumulation of psychological factors that impede making a free and deliberative act of the will.

Thus the general tendency is to see this extreme gesture as almost always resulting from the effects of an imbalanced mental state and, as a consequence, it is no longer forbidden to hold a funeral rite for a person who has committed this gesture although each case must still be studied on its merits.

Finally, it makes little difference, from the viewpoint of liturgical law, whether the body is present or not. If someone is denied a Church funeral, this applies to all public ceremonies although it does not impede the celebration of private Masses for the soul of the deceased.

The same principle applies to funeral Masses of those whose body is unavailable for burial due to loss or destruction. Certainly the rites are different when the body is present or absent, but the Church's public intercession for the deceased is equally manifest in both cases.

[dimplebeck]

well, will all honesty, if I'm in that position, and I'm 101% sure that I didn't do anything wrong; the hell would I care on what the senators said, as long as my love ones believe me, that is all that matters to me, besides, if I'm really innocent, I will be in the fighting stance kay sigurado ko sa akong gi buhat, the last thing that will cross my mind is taking my life; it's an act of retreat, not taking the challenges that the senators threw to him. Now, kung naa jud xa nahibaw.an na irregularities, may he be involved or not, isn't it more honorable to tell the truth and save his country rather than taking his life and keeping the secrets in his grave and leave the filipino people hanging?

bull's eye bro! Reyes did a great disservice to the country he so passionately claims to love. He could have done better by spilling out what he knows. But the problem is, by doing so, it might reveal that he has done his part to the grand scale corruption in no small measure. jinggoy? well, if only cptn_star could see that's it's actually his money they're stealing, im sure he'd be arrogant too, if not more! Trillanes? well, what he did was only to go against his corrupt superiors. Menial thing that may be to people like cptn_star, but to me, it’s an act of courage reyes could not match even one tenth. Trillanes was never an errand boy to corrupt officials. So, military decorations or none, trillianes IS THE MAN!!!!

[INFRACTION]

sayo og checkin c Angelo Reyes sa imperno haha

[unsay_ngalan_nimo]

bull's eye bro! Reyes did a great disservice to the country he so passionately claims to love. He could have done better by spilling out what he knows. But the problem is, by doing so, it might reveal that he has done his part to the grand scale corruption in no small measure. jinggoy? well, if only cptn_star could see that's it's actually his money they're stealing, im sure he'd be arrogant too, if not more! Trillanes? well, what he did was only to go against his corrupt superiors. Menial thing that may be to people like cptn_star, but to me, it’s an act of courage reyes could not match even one tenth. Trillanes was never an errand boy to corrupt officials. So, military decorations or none, trillianes IS THE MAN!!!!

hindi naman masyado... siguro dapat din medyo maging kalma si trillanes... hes a public official dpat medyo marunong din siya ng diplomacy.. pero i like him.. refreshing sa senate... you know bakit ganun yung reaction nya kase ikaw ba naman makulong for 7 years..

[|ceman]

maybe because he knows how it is being the frontliners, kung unsa ka lisud mga ordinary soldiers, he witnessed that 1st hand, then mao ra diay gi pang buhat sa mga daku na buwaya sa taas, apil pa mga misis, maybe that fueled his emotions kay frustrating jud kaau, bisag kita ra na di sundalo ma frustrated naman gni ta, sila pa kaha na sila mismo ga atubang sa mga kontra

[THE SKULLS]

^^ ug kung pananglit dli siya nagpakamatay? gi unsa man pud pag assasinate?

aw, daghan pama-agi pagpatay sa iring brod. ila na sad tong style. dapat i-consider na nga angle.