MERGED: All About the Corona Impeachment

[Saint_hard]

---

#Cjtrialwatch: Acquit Him | Blog Watch Citizen Media

foreign deposits are confidential in nature. the fact that he signed the waiver showed he did it all in good faith.

i wouldnt want a vengeful president to control all 3 sectors sa atong govt. there should be a balance here. we all know that Noynoy started all this.
oh well, lets wait and see..

pastilan ug ma convict..pasabot ani ba controllado na ni pnoy tanang sector sa govt...tsk tsk tsk

[reptoid]

It's not good enough that the Chief Justice should be evading taxes or worse by exploiting a possible loophole. His position is one of trust and the keyword is "justice".... he should follow the spirit of the law and be a role-model. He is very much tainted by this episode and not because he is an innocent victim, but because he consciously chose a path which would bring him and the legal system into disrepute.

[Saint_hard]

It's not good enough that the Chief Justice should be evading taxes or worse by exploiting a possible loophole. His position is one of trust and the keyword is "justice".... he should follow the spirit of the law and be a role-model. He is very much tainted by this episode and not because he is an innocent victim, but because he consciously chose a path with would bring him and the legal system into disrepute.

ang maybe other govt. officials too would do that....

[lecreigh]

pastilan ug ma convict..pasabot ani ba controllado na ni pnoy tanang sector sa govt...tsk tsk tsk

of cors he has. his influence will always be there. di jud na xa mawala. there are people there willing to kiss anyone's feet to advanz themselves or whatever.
its obvious. Noynoy is dying to get corona off his seat, alangan nmn mosugot xa ug anti sa iyang mga plans ang molingkod if in case ma impeach xa. den he's living up to almost everyone's opinion of him.

@Plush
so true! mayta lng they'll make the right decision.

[reptoid]

ang maybe other govt. officials too would do that....

Probably many do, but he is the "chief justice" and as such his conduct should be exemplary. There should be no question mark hovering over his head, but there is because of decisions he made and for what reason....... to enrich himself? What happened to ethics?

[lecreigh]

It's not good enough that the Chief Justice should be evading taxes or worse by exploiting a possible loophole. His position is one of trust and the keyword is "justice".... he should follow the spirit of the law and be a role-model. He is very much tainted by this episode and not because he is an innocent victim, but because he consciously chose a path which would bring him and the legal system into disrepute.

which brought to mind that maybe its about time we should update our 1987 constitution dontcha think??

[plush]

It's not good enough that the Chief Justice should be evading taxes or worse by exploiting a possible loophole. His position is one of trust and the keyword is "justice".... he should follow the spirit of the law and be a role-model. He is very much tainted by this episode and not because he is an innocent victim, but because he consciously chose a path which would bring him and the legal system into disrepute.

His repuation was tainted because of the demonizing strategies and the trial by publicity used by media and the prosecution team.

You see, he was already prejudged as guilty not on the basis of evidences but on his association with GMA and the "fake" documents presented by the prosecution.

The fact that he signed the waiver without any conditions now is a sign that he omitted the inclusion of his dollar accounts in his SALN because of (1) his interpretation of RA 6426 and because no justice ever declared his dollar account on his SALN ever. He was merely following the norm. He thus, acted in good faith.

[reptoid]

which brought to mind that maybe its about time we should update our 1987 constitution dontcha think??

Absolutely, but I still think his position is untenable... and he should go.

[plush]

the question here is, were the evidences presented by the prosecution team enough to grant a conviction?

[reptoid]

the question here is, were the evidences presented by the prosecution team enough to grant a conviction?

I think it's become bigger than that. Is he fit to hold his position now that we know that his SALN was wildly inaccurate?... and is such a "sick" man suitable for a top job?