^^ sorry I don't get your summary.. what's your point?
Food for thought
One of the students who were not allowed to attend the rites did not go and push the issue.
The parent explained to the child the situation and the parent was a Theresian.
In essence, they accepted the consequences.
This is another side of parenting and supporting your child.
^^
Its an attempt of a summary of the topic, sir.
Kung mao ba na ang nahitabo sa issue. Kung naka-han-ay ba sa ato ang tanang facts and evidences about this. Insert diha ang questions nako.
@shebacs
summarizing the turn of events is already a done deal already.. para lang nako ha... I would rather leave this for the parents, STC heads and perhaps the court/judge to settle this out.... Anyway, the public has already been made aware of this and there are no point of discussion (for me) to assert on this since it has been made us and the whole people of what transpired already...
Perhaps, the only thing I can say why this has been blown into proportion, is the fact that iits a Graduation month (March) and the parties involved belong to some exclusive private girls school....
If this ever happened to some public schools or even to a even less girl public school (if there are any).. I doubt the media would even pick this up...
my point lang..
Source
from what DepEd assistant sec. Umali said:
"the ultimate objective ...is to reform the student... If the effect of the penalty to be imposed, is instead of reforming the student, is to punish her in such a way that she will not recover..then i think.. there is something wrong out there..."
...
"if a student has committed a wrong doing we need to make sure that whatever penalty to be imposed should have the effect of reforming the student and not condemning him/her forever."
maybe stc should just have given them a wholeday seminar on
"What is lewd and immoral in the eyes of STC"..![]()
Similar Threads |
|