^^ bro, believe me kung naa lang ko idea sa name sa gurl hagbay ra nako gi search na..
^^ bro, believe me kung naa lang ko idea sa name sa gurl hagbay ra nako gi search na..
Mao na ang sakto ... dili kay storyahan ang tao , butang unya wala tay kalibutan ug unsa ni .
Ok ra ang opinions but we should be responsible pod what we post .
Back to the topic ... I doubt if naa pa na ang PICTURE sa FB na maoy gika gubtan .
" A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. " - 2nd Amendment , Bill of Rights of the United States of America
Indeed, pics or GTFO.
So now we have an impression of a Catholic school girl wearing a two-piece bikini on a beach with her family, holding a cigarette in one hand - and for this she cannot walk up the Graduation stage. I wonder if there are other elements in that photo that are yet to be discovered, if you know what I mean.
Still, not a good enough reason to ban her from joining the ceremony IMO. Her family knows about it, so if it's fine with her family, nganung mu ti-ti man jud ang school.
^^^^
The only basis we have are from the copy and pasted news article .
Dili nimo mabasa ang story na she was with her FAMILY in a BEACH OUTING .
Wala na mo ti-ti ang school . They are portraying that anyone who goes to their school are ambassadors and representatives of that institution .
If di siya graduating , she will end up gihapon being expelled if we based it how strict mga madre didto in upholding the policies and regulations of the school . It just so happened na graduating diay .
Now if you are saying na kahibalo ang parents diay sa girl , then we are barking at the wrong tree . We should be talking about her PARENTS , not STC .
" A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. " - 2nd Amendment , Bill of Rights of the United States of America
from another source: High school girl banned from STC graduation rites over FacebookThe family’s lawyer Enrique Lacerna said the girl was photographed in a “family-related outing” and was “not given a chance to answer the allegations” when she was meted the sanctions in a notice last March 1.
Why would they say it was a "family-related outing" if it wasn't a family related outing? If it was, indeed, a family related outing, then her family would have known about her behavior and should have had the ability to judge whether or not her actions were considered "lewd". To say that her parents and family is not involved in this issue would be an insult to them and their judgment of morality. To say that her parents and family's judgment should be below that of the school's judgment (when in fact the event took place outside the school's campus and within a "family-related outing") would also be an insult to them and their judgment of morality as well.
I agree. Students should be careful not bring shame to their school's name. But unless we see that picture, we'll never really grasp the true nature of this issue. Just sayin' that based on the information that we have now, I think the school admin has a lot of explaining to do.
Last edited by ReikoChan; 03-28-2012 at 02:52 PM.
Stalking on FB sister? lol
If the parents knows about that picture and doesn't mind those things, then what? Are the parents have consent about those pictures being posted on facebook before STC acknowledge and inform about that photo violating their policies & regulations of the school? If it is listed on those school handbook rules, STC can implies sanction regarding that incident.
Teenager nowadays ought to be careless posting pictures on facebook that might lead to unnecessary scenarios lead to bigger problems may occur. The guidance of the parents must be there if they are really consented with that picture as may say. School implements their rules but also parents uphold their values to their children to be more aware and be responsible outside the house to society, school, work & community.
ang punto ra jud ani, naay patakaran ang school, feeling nila naviolate ug nainsult ang ila patakaran, naghimo sila ug action.
ang sa pikas sad, nireklamo sila kay walay due process.
regardless what the issue is, kung walay due process, di jud justified ila gibuhat. PERO justified ug dili, hibalo sad dapat sila unsay kalapasan.
in the argument of private affair, birthday affair... the moment na gipost nimo na sa FB, it is no longer private. it already is open for the world to see.
Let us all be responsible in using any social networking sites.
for we cant point fingers on who to blame. daghan kaau ang rason na pwede gamiton kung kinsa sala. para nku this is an eye opener sa tana na dli kaau mag padala anang facebook. all has faults that led to this incident and the school admin has the last say kay ilaha man ang school and rules.
Similar Threads |
|