STEPHEN HAWKING AND GOD --- john lennox explains

[wormwoods]

---

sayop si John lennox, he tries to discredit Hawkings God of the Gaps by pushing in the God of Theology w/c is rejected by science. wa pa man ma proven ang God sa theology bai. Hawkings was talking from the point of view of Science and this old guy comes bringing THEOLOGY as proof for his God? so wrong.


kung mo ingon ta Science it means it is a theory based on observable trend but mo nigon gani ta og Theology it means based on an ancient book written by men, i other words, speculation.

So kung mao ni imong perception, meaning dili sad na tinuod ang mga butang like guilt, love, compassion, etc. kay dili mana ma explain sa science?

For your information, science deals only with the physical/observable universe. Beyond that, it is totally silent and those who are relying solely in it have zero knowledge about the supernaturals. Meaning, limited ra atong knowledge about our existence kung mag depende ra ta diha.

And the most important thing sa atong existence are the ones which are not physical, dili mahikap ug makita.

[Klave]

So kung mao ni imong perception, meaning dili sad na tinuod ang mga butang like guilt, love, compassion, etc. kay dili mana ma explain sa science?

For your information, science deals only with the physical/observable universe. Beyond that, it is totally silent and those who are relying solely in it have zero knowledge about the supernaturals. Meaning, limited ra atong knowledge about our existence kung mag depende ra ta diha.

And the most important thing sa atong existence are the ones which are not physical, dili mahikap ug makita.

Ang fault sa imong reasoning kay "ang mga butang like guilt, love, compassion, etc. kay dili mana ma explain sa science."
Well, actually these things you speak of are explained in the field of psychology.

But you still have a point though.
Otherwise, I really would like to think that there cannot be something from nothing, there was always something.
And if you want to call that something god, then that is another opinion.

[wormwoods]

That is not an opinion brod, that is the reality! nahitabo na tanan nakasuwat sa bibliya ug lahi ang taw sa unang panahon ug karon, nahisulat ilang experience para atong masabtan ang presensya sa creator. gihatagan ta sa ginoo ug capacity to understand and appreciate the beauty of his creations. We ought to exercise that faith!

daghan mga experience ug testimony sa mga christians bro about visions, dreams of the Lord and it is an undeniable experience coz i myself nakasuway sad ani nga vision. God will reveal to us if we are humble enough to ask for his grace and mercy.

The secret to understand his purpose in life is this verse from James 4:8:
"DRAW NIGH TO GOD and HE WILL DRAW NIGH TO YOU....."

dili nato libogon pa atong existence kay mawala nalang ta diri sa kalibutan may lang kung atong knowledge makaabot ug 1% about sa total information sa whole universe.

God simplified his purpose for us in the bible! it is for our eternal destiny kung unsa atong response sa iyang pulong. It's our own choice.

[Breakeven]

up for this nice thread.

[zploj]

"Science without Religion Is Lame, Religion without Science Is Blind" - Albert Einstein

[TOPNOYZE]

fully function paba kaha ning utok ni stephen hawking?kay baldado na raba, tinuod ba kaha ang conversion output nga ipang sulti sa machine nga naka connect sa iyang lawas?

Dili na fully gyud brad naa part sa iyang brain maong baldado sya...pero i think naay part sa iyang brain nga nag function pa gihapon iyang reasoning.