Why is it that AMD boards doesn't have a triple channel features?

[EarlZ]

---

Axis: AMD crushed Intel big time BEFORE. I just hope they can make a come-back someday. Oh, if the original post-your-rigs here thread still exist, you'll see most of our rigs were powered by AMD.

Yes, Mine included.

[AxisVirus]

@CrashBURN : yep kad2 pd sauna sir. ka2ng sempron age pa. when i tested pag release sa dual core vs sempron. nalupig man ang dual core nuon. Someday. maabot ra ang time nga AMD will crush INTEL.

@EarlZ : solid intel jd diay ka sir. ehehehe.

[AxisVirus]

try nya ko INTEL based system sunod. puhon2 laming lawas. ahahaha pero i'll stick with the AMD as of now.

[EarlZ]

@CrashBURN : yep kad2 pd sauna sir. ka2ng sempron age pa. when i tested pag release sa dual core vs sempron. nalupig man ang dual core nuon. Someday. maabot ra ang time nga AMD will crush INTEL.

@EarlZ : solid intel jd diay ka sir. ehehehe.

Not really, My money goes to the company that offers value for performance, currently AMD does not offer that anymore.. Not for the last 6-7yrs.

[AxisVirus]

sayang kaau ang amd. wala nila gi improve ang ila processors ka2ng sila pa ang nag rule. wla nila gpahimuslan

[lazaro4ever]

Not really, My money goes to the company that offers value for performance, currently AMD does not offer that anymore.. Not for the last 6-7yrs.

I kinda disagree.. Around 2-3 years ago, Intel was still using the Socket 775 and Core 2 Duo ad Core 2 Quads were their premium product.. I compared the performance of Processors under the same budget.. under the 3,500 below processor budget, Core 2 Duo E7200 is beaten by AMD Athlon II X3..

If low end (including motherboard, HSF), AMD still has an edge. The only time that Intel really shines is when you OC and go above the $90 or P4,000 budget. But OCing with Intel can get rather expensive, since you need to invest in a good mobo.. but most people dont OC.

Anything above 4,000 is Intel's bread and butter though... Even if you OC AMD processors, Intel wins the upper market..

[EarlZ]

Saying that you need to OC for intel to get the upper hand is entirely wrong, My basis is purely stock speeds. OCing is just an icing on the cake. 2yrs ago Intel already when with the LGA1366, If your referring to he core2 series then that was 6-7yrs ago since Intel held the performance crown. During the initial introduction of the core2 it was a bit more expensive but it still offered better price to performance, when the 45nm core2 came out it offered lower prices for better performance.
For me AMD only wins in the sub 3,000 processor market.

This is already off the topic, which has been already answered on the first page.