The Armed Forces has ordered its officers and men to strictly observe the supremacy of civilian authority over the military.
Armed Forces chief of staff Gen. Generoso Senga emphasized the need for the military officers and personnel to remain apolitical in The Role of the Armed Forces in these Trying Times.
Army chief Lt. Gen. Hermogenes Esperon Jr. said Senga issued the guidelines last March 8.
Some senior military officers based in Camp Aguinaldo believed that Senga’s guidance was a clear reaction to a controversial statement made by Col. Tristan Kison, former Armed Forces information chief.
Kison, who was replaced by Brig. Gen. Jose Honrado, had said the military was a strong pillar that played a key role in keeping President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo at the helm. He was further quoted as saying that: “If we break, the nation will collapse.”
Reminding the troops about their sworn duty to the people and the Constitution, Senga in his guidance said that soldiers should not involve themselves in any political power play “even if their Commander-in-Chief is embroiled in controversy.”
The Armed Forces chief said soldiers should not be regarded as a potent political force to be used by politicians in the furtherance of their vested interests.
Quoting Senga’s written guidance, Esperon said the military must remain apolitical and “must not wrest power for ourselves.”
Senga said the military’s constitutional duty as protector of the people and state was “not a license to wrest leadership of the government from public officials on the basis of perceived intervention of governance.”
“As professional soldiers, we do not enjoy an unrestrained license to engage in partisan politics or publicly speak our minds against the government without having to take the serious accountability for our unauthorized action,” Senga said.
Citing a 1988 high tribunal decision in the case of Kapunan et al versus the Armed Forces chief of staff, Senga said the Supreme Court set distinctive parameters to the civil rights enjoyed by soldiers.
“It ruled that certain civil liberties of persons in the military service, including freedom of speech, may be circumscribed by rules of military discipline. For one, this is contained in the decision in the case of Kapunan et al that to a certain degree, individual rights of military personnel may be curtailed in order to maintain discipline in our ranks.”
For his part, Esperon during the news conference revealed that the military has already “cemented and sealed” the cracks but they still have to continue in closely watching moves as “threat of an uprising still persists to exist.”
“But we are not letting our guard down,” Esperon said.