Resign calls for Margie mount for ‘Pajero’ propaganda vs bishops
Current Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) Chief Margarita Juico is now the embattled official, and not the seven Catholic bishops tagged as the “Pajero bishops” in the media, after it was disclosed during the Senate hearing on the donation of expensive Sports Utility Vehicles (SUVs) were nothing approximating these, since most of the donated vehicles were service pick-ups used by the diocese in aiding the poor and the needy.
The bishops who all appeared at the Senate said they were returning the vehicles and left them parked in the Senate grounds.
Calls were made for Juico to resign her post for having falsely accused the bishops of having requested and being granted by the PCSO the “Pajeros” and expensive SUVs.
Several senators also scolded Juico, who didn’t fare well in answering questions on the issue which she tried to evade and pass on to others.
Juico, during the hearing, denied that it was she who had branded the bishops as the Pajero Bishops, even as Senate President Pro Tempore Jinggoy Estrada showed several newspaper and TV online news clippings quoting her as having said it.
Senators also took turns in what may be termed as a severe scolding of Juico for making it appear that the bishops had all been given expensive SUVs and Pajeros, when not one vehicle donated was a Pajero, and with other vehcles being even second hand.
Senate President Juan Ponce-Enrile expressed
disappointment over the way the current PCSO officials “exposed” the issue to the public since not a single Pajero was given to the seven bishops.
“They (bishops) were unfairly accused of recieving expensive vehicles which was rather incorrect. It’s not just being careless...I’ll leave it as that that. I do not know the mind of people when they said what they said. Let’s allow it to unravel,” he said.
With the “Pajero scandal” backfiring on PCSO officials, chairman Juico, tried to straighten out the mess they created saying that tag did not come from them.
Estrada sought an answer from Juico since testimonies made by the bishops yielded no information on the supposed Pajero vehicles.
“You mean to say the present PCSO Board invented that name Pajero just to put the bishops in a bad light?” the senator asked.
“We never said Pajero. We were given these findings from the CoA (Commission on Audit) that five vehicles costing P6.9 million granted to the Catholic Church were charged to the charity fund. The name Pajero did not come from us. It came about when somebody said it was Pajero…I don’t know (who),” she said.
Estrada was prompted to cite published news reports in which she was quoted as having the name Pajero yet Juico continued to deny it.
Juico said she does not recall saying these were pajeros. “It was I think an information that was given to us by one of the managers in PCSO when they said utility vehicles were given to bishops. I think what happened there was when you mention a sports utility vehicle, you always say Pajero, It’s like saying frigidaire when what you really mean is refrigerator,” she said.
But Estrada wasn;t about to let go: “Soyou assumed when it was a sports utility vehicle, you assumed that it was already a Pajero?”
PCSO general manager Jose Ferdinand Rojas II then came to the rescue of Juico saying that she might have been misquoted.
Juico apologized but this apology didn’t seem to have appeased the bishops, who could not be convinced to keep the vehicles, despite the senators stating that the donations to the bishops, as recievers, were not illegal or unconstitutional.
The bishops, through Cotabato bishop Orlando Quevedo even went as far as making the bishops’ sentiment clear, intimating broadly that government-Church collaboration in assisting the needy may no longer be possible, since mistrust has set in.
Butuan Bishop Juan de Dios Pueblos said it was a lapse of judgment on his part to have requested a Mitsubishi Montero Sports 2008 model as a “birthday gift” from then president and now Pampanga Rep. Gloria Arroyo, saying ths has “cast a shadow and uncertainty on my dignity as a bishop and my moral ascendancy as a leader of the Catholic Church,” although he stressed that the vehicle was used for the diocese work in assiting to the needy.
The pronouncements of the seven bishops, earlier alleged to have been in receipt of supposed SUVs from the Arroyo administration, read before the panel by Cotabato Archbishop Orlando Quevedo, O.M.I., to return these so-called gifts to the PCSO.
They however remained form n their belief that they did not violate any law or even the Constitution.
“As our pastoral statement has said, we honestly failed to consider the pitfalls to which these grants could possibly lead,” he said, speaking on behalf of Pueblos, Bishop Rodolfo Beltran of Bontoc-Lagawe, Nueva Segovia Archbishop Ernesto Salgado, Bishop Leopoldo Jaucian of Abra, SVD; Martin Jumoad of Basilan and Archbishop Romulo Valles.
Salgado did not appear in the hearing as he was currently abroad but was represented by his auxiliary bishop David William Antonio.
The Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP), in a letter sent to the Senate last week, said Beltran actually received a secondhand 10-year-old Nissan Pathfinder pick-up; Jaucian a Mitsubishi Strada pick up; Quevedo a Toyota Grandia Hi-Ace; Jumoad also a Strada pick-up; Valles also a Hi-Ace Grandia and Salgado an Isuzu Crosswind.
Valles, clarified before the panel that he actually refused the vehicle “assigned” to be given to him by Arroyo.
The Daily Tribune - Without Fear or Favor