Tinuod ba may porgatoryo?

[regnauld]

---

the video does not talk about symbols nor that book of DANTE what ever..

you think Dante was speaking about the literal purgatory? THINK AGAIN!

[regnauld]

may be you should read more books other than that of Dante. para deli mastuck imo knowledge on some old school ideas.

better watch this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yk-Ck...eature=related

Are you saying purgatory is literally true? Some priests don't believe anymore in the existence of purgatory.

[dartzed]

you think Dante was speaking about the literal purgatory? THINK AGAIN!

ah okies.. so unsa man jud d i purgatoryo nga deli literal kana giingon sa RC?..

[dartzed]

Are you saying purgatory is literally true? Some priests don't believe anymore in the existence of purgatory.

so whats your definition of literally?..
some does not mean all, it's a common problem if esp naay doubt.. but that doesn't mean it's not there either..

[regnauld]

[QUOTE=dartzed;5755474]ah okies.. so unsa man jud d i purgatoryo nga deli literal kana giingon sa RC?..[/QUO

FYI, purgatory in Ancient wisdom is cleansing process which is very metaphorical. You might want to study ESOTERIC CHRISTIANITY!

[dartzed]

[QUOTE=regnauld;5755628]

ah okies.. so unsa man jud d i purgatoryo nga deli literal kana giingon sa RC?..[/QUO

FYI, purgatory in Ancient wisdom is cleansing process which is very metaphorical. You might want to study ESOTERIC CHRISTIANITY!

ah okies so how is this processing done, of course not literally as you said, right?..

[borge_009]

Gigamit lng na sa simbahan para makakwarta......usa pa mga pagans man nag imbento ana...........

[Vien]

Mga Bros and Sis Dili man kita maka ingon nga naa ba o wla kay Wla man kita mahibalo sa Tinuod
sa Biblia wla jud na sya masulat pero ang uban dili man mo basi sa Bible it's there option, they have a free will man, so if ever mo ingon ta nga wala according sa Bible ang uban mo agree kay they base their faith and knowledge from the Bible
but others are not the same faith as what others have too dili ba? We cannot force other people to believe on either ways they have options. We still need to Dig the truth Pepz coz every thing in history has a what they call "CONSPIRACY" They said preservation of Faith
and then in the end You will Know DAGHAN NA KAAYO RELIGION NANG GAWAS What's the point
ADUNA BAY PRESERVATION SA TINUOD NGA TINUHUAN? WLA MAN TINGALI? But for me GINOO RA ANG NAHIBALO SA TANAN I AM A BORN AGAIN CHRISTIAN BUT OPEN MINDED KO NOT A CLOSE MINDED CHRISTIAN. THERE'S SO MUCH NEED FOR US TO SEARCH FOR TRUTH.

[amingb]

hmmmmm it's the 70 rabbis..

hmmmmm apil bya sa pagtranslate asa kaman kabaw ana nga wala niya giapil?.. contradictory YES in the Jewish doctrice for those 7 books be tested too much that Jesus was the messiah(not what their doctrine said).. so mao nang wala giapil sa Jews ang 7 books plus those books are not recorded in Hebrews language but Greek samot deli jud dawaton.. asta ang NEW TESTAMENT wala nila gidawat(alangan Greek man ang authors lolz) which is unfair


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yk-Ck...eature=related

St. Jerome Wrote this :

"As, then, the Church reads Judith, Tobit, and the books of Maccabees, but does not admit them among the canonical Scriptures, so let it read these two volumes for the edification of the people, not to give authority to doctrines of the Church."

2 Timothy 3:16 - All scripture, inspired of God, is profitable to teach, to reprove, to correct, to instruct in justice. NEW TESTAMENT

so mao nahimo ang religion nga Christians dere nagsugod tanan sprout ang lain division of christian..

if ang maccabees ra ang nibother nimo bro try to watch this video deli raman maccabees ang gibasehan:

Since Apocryphal is not Inspired by God Therefore it is not part of the Scripture .... wala na siya authority to church doctrines.

Yes dili lang maccabees but the source of it all is maccabees ... now kanang ilaha interpretation on the canonical books regarding purgatory is a wrong interpretation.

[amingb]

The First Church who Rejected Apocryphal Book is the Roman Catholic Church not the Protestant ... "These were permissible to be read in the churches for the purposes of edification but were never "considered authoritative for establishing doctrine."

“St. Jerome distinguished between canonical books and ecclesiastical books. The latter he judged were circulated by the Church as good spiritual reading but were not recognized as authoritative Scripture."

Pangutana ngano gi apil mana later sa Roman Catholic Church during the first council of trent ?