Supreme Court acquits Webb, et al

[FranZeno]

---

Kinsa mga licensed lawyers jud diri na ni post? Or much better judge jd? Your opinions matter the most.

Murag problema sd ni sa Pilipinas, daghan na gani kaau licensed na lawyer, n.pun.an pa jd og pseudo-lawyers og (worse) judges kunuhay.. It would be nice to know kung kinsa jud lawyers diri.a..

If lawyer ka, pls do reply to this post. If not, there's no need.

SURE KA LAWYER JUD KA? IF DILI THEN AYAW NA REPLY ANI

[masakiton]

O basin naay ganahan mo "FACT" ni Hubert Webb. hahahaha...

c gwen ako idol
ang FACTs/evidence/testimony/documents ila gi basehan sa SC sa ila decision dili personal feelings sa masa

[PaYaSo]

c gwen ako idol
ang FACTs/evidence/testimony/documents ila gi basehan sa SC sa ila decision dili personal feelings sa masa

teh, youre not funny anymore.
dont try to waste the bandwidth with these foolishness

[black_mamba]

teh, youre not funny anymore.
dont try to waste the bandwidth with these foolishness

mao jud.... g.bogo.an nlng goro ni xa sa mga nagbasa diri... kasabot man mi unsa imo gusto ipasabot oi!

[mata_hari]

were Hubert and et al. able to prove their innocence beyond reasonable doubt. di ba we put great weight to that when acquitting for alleged criminals.

have you read the transcripts? i am not convinced! what went wrong with the convictions previously decided by the two lower courts? i smell something fishy.

[masakiton]

were Hubert and et al. able to prove their innocence beyond reasonable doubt. di ba we put great weight to that when acquitting for alleged criminals.

have you read the transcripts? i am not convinced! what went wrong with the convictions previously decided by the two lower courts? i smell something fishy.

G.R. No. 176389

[FranZeno]

were Hubert and et al. able to prove their innocence beyond reasonable doubt. di ba we put great weight to that when acquitting for alleged criminals.

have you read the transcripts? i am not convinced! what went wrong with the convictions previously decided by the two lower courts? i smell something fishy.

This is what went wrong sa two lower courts:

Excerpt lng where the Judge Tolentino went wrong sa una:

The defense produced more than 400 documents and presented 95 witnesses, including Hubert Webb himself and his father, along with other relatives and friends to support Webb’s alibi that he was in the United States from March 9, 1991, to October 26, 1992. On October 1, 1996, Judge Amelita Tolentino admitted only 10 of the 142 pieces of evidence the defense presented. Among evidence that was not admitted by Judge Tolentino, was the note verbale from the United States Embassy claiming that Webb was in the United States at the time of the massacre. This coincided with his passport and Philippine Immigration records but were dismissed by Tolentino's court, due to belief that these documents can possibly be falsified. Tolentino stated that she would accept this evidence only if then Secretary of State Madeleine Albright would testify as to the veracity of the note verbale's contents. Moreover, Judge Tolentino also denied Webb's request to subject semen samples to DNA testing on the belief that the samples may no longer be intact. The accused alleged that by rejecting 132 of the 142 pieces of evidence, Tolentino had set the tone for their conviction. On July 24, 1997, the Supreme Court noted that Tolentino erred when she refused to admit the 132 pieces of evidence presented by the defense, although these were later admitted in court through an order issued by Tolentino.

GR No. 127262

Webb's petition to request for the Testimony by Oral Deposition of US Govt Officials and citizens:

G.R. No. 132577

Weird isn't it why g.deny ang request ni Webb to subject the semen for DNA samples? There's really no harm in trying eventhough they claim it wouldn't be intact. And now, more than a decade later, the semen was gone.

[kenites]

This is what went wrong sa two lower courts:



Weird isn't it why g.deny ang request ni Webb to subject the semen for DNA samples? There's really no harm in trying eventhough they claim it wouldn't be intact. And now, more than a decade later, the semen was gone.

hmmm.. and I smell something fishy here..

[cebulifer]

were Hubert and et al. able to prove their innocence beyond reasonable doubt. di ba we put great weight to that when acquitting for alleged criminals.

have you read the transcripts? i am not convinced! what went wrong with the convictions previously decided by the two lower courts? i smell something fishy.

i think its the prosecution's job to present evidence to convict webb et.al that they did the crime. if they make a mistake, like what they did with jessica alfaro, then the accused are acquitted.

[unsay_ngalan_nimo]

ni dry na ang sperm sa panty mao na.. dili an pwede ang DNA kay naa man half-life... besides... pwede man gud macontaminate taking into consideration na that time our law enforcers dont know how to handle forensic evidence much... if ever nisugot sa DNA then contaminated then negative na ang resut na dili gyud kay webb ang sperm.. then that would be enough to acquit him which is what happened anyway...


poor handling of evidence.. thats what destroyed this case..