Wa ko kasabot sa logic sa uban diri.
You give money to someone because you trust them to use the money for the intended purpose that it was asked for. There are laws for breach of that trust.
Then our concern trolls in this thread claim that we give money to the church because we trust them UNCONDITIONALLY to use the money for its intended purpose WITHOUT EXPECTATION OF RESULTS. Then they say they are not accountable for that if they don't use it for that purpose? Wala daw obligasyon ang simbahan mo eksplikar sa unsay nahitabo sa kwarta?! Ha?! Wala mo nayabag?
Those two things have the same thing in common. They require trust. They require money to be entrusted in GOOD FAITH to the recipient. Violation of such will require the full penalty of the law.
Why should the law not apply to scenario #2? Pasbata kuno ko. Puro man gud mo double-standard gud mao na pataka lang yawit!
Last edited by tokidoki; 06-06-2011 at 05:14 PM.
we understand how you feel. respect to that.
but to base it strictly on your rational analysis and logic and to keep trying on applying sincere standards of judgement? ......is not cute.
Last edited by koontz_circle; 06-06-2011 at 04:21 PM. Reason: a
^^ i understand pud bro. i just hate hypocrites lang gyud and the church or most religions is always oozing with people like that.
Yeah, kay nag-ingon diay ko nga maayo tong gibuhat sa mga pari sauna?
Rizal became a National Hero because his sacrifices made a difference in our society.
Ako lang ba, daghan pa jud kaayo nga na-instill sa mind sa mga tawo nga ang Simbahan primarily "pangilad" ra jud.
Sure, naay mga badlongon nga pari, but it should not reflect the overall objectives / mission of the Church.
Grabe naman sad, wala jud ka'y nailhan nga respitado nga pari? Tanan jud pari imong makit-an, puro hyprocrisy jud imong mahuna-hunaan?
^^ana jud na bro basta full of hatred naka sama sa TS.. hehe
padung na jud ni ka way ayu atong kalibutan
Similar Threads |
|