PC or MAC and why??

[nips101]

---

Windows, no one bother's making viruses for mac cause no one knows what Mac is.
Pc, why do you pay more when the specs are the same. Besides, pc can become a mac.

[Queen Mojitos]

pc ko oiee easy to use hehe

[mlnsgbn]

sa mani uy.....bi klaruha kuno do!

[ace101]

for versatility, ill go for PC. For performance, ill go for mac.

[tokidoki_v2.0]

To say that a mac has virtually no viruses is like saying that a beggar doesn't get robbed. Pointless.

If an OS is trivial, hackers will not waste time coding a virus for it. Viruses need to propagate into a wide population. Guess how many MACs are in the population? Not much. You don't gather fame by exploiting the lesser OS. You design something malicious (for your personal satisfaction and ego) that cripples "millions" of networks and users not by exploiting the few who will most likely have no idea what's going on.

I hope you do your research before you dwell on the myth that Macs don't get viruses. They do and they already had. The fact remains is that no one is interested.

For power users I'd go with a PC. For convenience and simplicity I'd go for mac. Macs were designed by job "for the average user to use". That has always been their goal since its inception.

[Lord_Ac]

To say that a mac has virtually no viruses is like saying that a beggar doesn't get robbed. Pointless.

If an OS is trivial, hackers will not waste time coding a virus for it. Viruses need to propagate into a wide population. Guess how many MACs are in the population? Not much. You don't gather fame by exploiting the lesser OS. You design something malicious (for your personal satisfaction and ego) that cripples "millions" of networks and users not by exploiting the few who will most likely have no idea what's going on.

I hope you do your research before you dwell on the myth that Macs don't get viruses. They do and they already had. The fact remains is that no one is interested.

For power users I'd go with a PC. For convenience and simplicity I'd go for mac. Macs were designed by job "for the average user to use". That has always been their goal since its inception.

Basically this.

[butitoy]

for me MAC no need to worry on viruses.....

wrong

that's a myth.read more ggogle.

Virus shows that mac os x is not invulnerable- The Inquirerr

New Mac Trojan horse masquerades as virus scanner | Antivirus & Security | MacUser | Macworld

and for that.SOPHOS offers FREE antivirus
Sophos offers Free Anti-Virus Home Edition for Mac

[tokidoki_v2.0]

oh, btw, there was a hacking contest a few years back in the open source consortium.

The mac's security was compromised in just under 15mins.
Linux took hours.
Surprisingly (drum roll), windows was compromised in over a day.

[butitoy]

for versatility, ill go for PC. For performance, ill go for mac.

> for versatility, ill go for PC

correct!

> for performance, ill go for mac

wrong.

question: what powers your MAC?

answer: intel
fact: that's PC processor , mac's another OEM company who use it.

question : how much is the basic MAC Quad?
Apple - iMac - Compare the 21.5- and 27-inch iMac.

answer: 1199$


at that price..PhP 50K+ / -

i can assemble an i7 2600k PC thats mighty powerful than a basic imac

it will not have the beautiful looks and the apple cinema, but it will not be dull..

and we are talking about performance here.

[tokidoki_v2.0]

^^ OT: 50k for an i7? Including monitor ni? Can you show a break down for the parts on how this is even possible? Last time I checked man gud I had a total of 70k (i did the parts hunting myself. i usually choose midrange parts and this is not a mall price.).

OnT:
My favorite sa mac is their AIR but only the 2011 model. So far reasonable na iya price. I also fancied the Samsung slim line series but my god ang presyo over the top na kaayo!