It looks like the Danish cartoonist was accurate in his drawings of Mohammed

[personalmgt]

---

I am not muslim and have little to no muslim friends. But please, for Christ's sake and to avoid misplaced hate...

Referring to this image:


I ask you, can you differentiate that image with the following images:



There's a difference right? Now I ask you this, which of the turbans are we referring to as the one used by the bomber? Well your answer would be, the second image right? because referring to the Danish drawing, it is! damn everyone's so smart. WELL CONGRATS SMARTASS, YOU JUST SPEWED BULLCRAP.

The first image (not the Danish drawing), is actually an Afghan Turban which closely resembles the Danish drawing. The second one is actually a Indian Turban or a turban used by Sikhs, a religion that originated from India. RING RING RING SMARTASS. Herp derp all turban wearers are possible terrorists.

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE, DO NOT MISTAKE SIKHS AS TERRORISTS. How accurate is the Danish Drawing to Mohammed? Well it's inaccurate as f**k. It's turban alone is wrong.

To original poster, way to go for insulting people who wear turbans. To everyone hating Islam, enjoy your hate mongering.

[reptoid]

"Mohammed sees a red demon that is torturing women by hanging them up by hooks through their breasts, as they are engulfed in flames. The women are being punished for giving birth to illegitimate children whom they falsely claimed were fathered by their husbands".

For other enlightening medieval Islamic depictions of Mohammed:

Mohammed Image Archive

[trublu]

Para nako dili kasaligan ang muslim,mga traydor na sila.

[ta3]

Para nako dili kasaligan ang muslim,mga traydor na sila.

Dili sd tanan bai...hasta bitaw ubang kristyano, eglisya, saksi ni (insert idol)...etc... kay dli sd kasaligan.

[noel_llapa]

Para nako dili kasaligan ang muslim,mga traydor na sila.

That's an unfair generalization. I for one am not comfortable with the tenets of Islam itself, but the people who just happens to be Muslims should be given a benefit of a doubt, as one would give to any person regardless of race or creed. People may be influenced by their culture or religion, but in the end, it's up to them how they conduct themselves, as such, judge not an individual by his religion (though I'm not against judging his religion), but by his actions.

[trublu]

Dili sd tanan bai...hasta bitaw ubang kristyano, eglisya, saksi ni (insert idol)...etc... kay dli sd kasaligan.

sakto dili sad tanan pero molabaw gyud ang muslim ka traydor.

[trublu]

That's an unfair generalization. I for one am not comfortable with the tenets of Islam itself, but the people who just happens to be Muslims should be given a benefit of a doubt, as one would give to any person regardless of race or creed. People may be influenced by their culture or religion, but in the end, it's up to them how they conduct themselves, as such, judge not an individual by his religion (though I'm not against judging his religion), but by his actions.

Para nako traydor gyud ang muslim base on my own experienced.walay maka lupig sa muslim pag ka traydor.

[ta3]

Naka uyab ka og muslim brod? Or gibuwagan ka og muslim?

So pila naman ka muslim imong nahimamat nga naka ingon ka nga labaw sila ka traydor?

[denkyo]

Para nako dili kasaligan ang muslim,mga traydor na sila.

You can't trust or not trust someone based simply on their religious affiliation. People make choices about how they live their lives. The tenets of most major religions would, if followed well, help people be trustworthy. There are in every religious and non-religious group people who are trustworthy and those who aren't. Best thing to do is have an open-mind, not blindly trust or mistrust anyone.

[trublu]

Naka uyab ka og muslim brod? Or gibuwagan ka og muslim?

So pila naman ka muslim imong nahimamat nga naka ingon ka nga labaw sila ka traydor?

muslim ka bordz?ngano naabot naman intawon kag uyab2x.adto colon pag negosyo didto para masweto ka unsa ka traydor ng mga muslim.