Why is it that AMD boards doesn't have a triple channel features?

[AxisVirus]

---

sa overclocking man cguro ka2ng ni abot 7ghz ang AMD. pero dugay nsad toh.

[blizzaga4]

core per core Intel is faster no need to make it complicated.

now this is what I've been searching in my layman's head

[EarlZ]

Actually dli laymans, lahi jud ang gi convey sa imong post, its like a your explaining DDR and SDR on cores.

[AxisVirus]

Someday AMD will crush INTEL. ahahaha

[CrasHBURN]

AMD currently serve for low-mid-end computers... for now, triple channel isn't important to them. Importante 6-core bahala na low end ang speed hehehe...

For me AMD should do something, wala'y competensya ang Intel. Motherboards are expensive!

[EarlZ]

Someday AMD will crush INTEL. ahahaha

I hope so, coz I really want Ivy bridge to be cheaper!

[CrasHBURN]

Axis: AMD crushed Intel big time BEFORE. I just hope they can make a come-back someday. Oh, if the original post-your-rigs here thread still exist, you'll see most of our rigs were powered by AMD.

[EarlZ]

AMD currently serve for low-mid-end computers... for now, triple channel isn't important to them. Importante 6-core bahala na low end ang speed hehehe...

For me AMD should do something, wala'y competensya ang Intel. Motherboards are expensive!

Agree with this, Intel is really charging premium for the highest end model because AMD has nothing to compete with, Image the 1090T is only competing against yorkfield. AMD has nothing thats faster than the Nahalem and SB.

i3 is very much dominating even the lower end.

[blizzaga4]

i3 crushed my world. Damn!

[EarlZ]

i5 crushed crashburn hehehe