Did ADAM and EVE have Belly buttons?

[likyam]

---

for me, they had bellybuttons. otherwise, they may have looked like aliens which I don't think God would allow...

here's a trivia about eve: don't you know that she was a very jealous type that she keeps on counting adam's ribs everytime he comes home? basin daw gikuhaan na pod sa Ginoo nya gihimong lain nga babaye...tsk tsk tsk

bai lolong, i respect the idea bai. pero just because of the idea na wala silay belly buttons wouldn't mean really na alien sila. Traditional labeling man na sa tawo nga alien ang usa ka being kung weird or unusual siya. ako lang argument bai kai: di ba? ang pusod scar man na sa may tiyan nato which was formed out from the umbilical cord in which we were connected once from our mother while we were in the womb? di ba si eve man ang first woman? and si eve was only created second to adam? adam was the first being "made", not born from God. so in the sense bai, our forefather adam was not born from a mother. so, i presume na si adam bai wouldn't have any bellybutton.

[krushuddel]

yes they do have..the question is..if Eve dont have asa i connect ni Cain and Abel ang ilahang umbilical cord? if eve was taken from the rib of Adam, Adam also has a bellybutton..will it contradict science? no it won't...nice thread though..

[krushuddel]

pareha ra na cla kng asa na una, manok or itlog...pra nako wla bai

OT: unsa kaha nauna bai? dili kaha ang manok? kay eggs has no capability to hatch without the support of their mother(hen)..

[lolong tan]

... ako lang argument bai kai: di ba? ang pusod scar man na sa may tiyan nato which was formed out from the umbilical cord in which we were connected once from our mother while we were in the womb? di ba si eve man ang first woman? and si eve was only created second to adam? adam was the first being "made", not born from God. so in the sense bai, our forefather adam was not born from a mother. so, i presume na si adam bai wouldn't have any bellybutton.

mo quote lang ko ug verses sa bible sir ha (i'm not that bible reader though)...

KJV Gen 5:1-3 This [is] the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him; Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam and Eve, in the day when they were created. And Adam lived a hundred and thirty years, and begat [a son] in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth:

so based ani nga verses, it follows nga ang descendants ni Adam to Seth to our generation are all created in God's likeness and image. since we have bellybuttons ergo, naa poy bellybuttons sila si Adam and Eve...

@ krushuddel: chicken comes first to this world 'coz it was NEVER mentioned that God was making a hatchery or nursery for His creations, automatic ra na clang nanunga through His WORD...

[tripwire]

mo quote lang ko ug verses sa bible sir ha (i'm not that bible reader though)...

KJV Gen 5:1-3 This [is] the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him; Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam and Eve, in the day when they were created. And Adam lived a hundred and thirty years, and begat [a son] in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth:

so based ani nga verses, it follows nga ang descendants ni Adam to Seth to our generation are all created in God's likeness and image. since we have bellybuttons ergo, naa poy bellybuttons sila si Adam and Eve...

That verse does not even tell us that Adam has one. But with your interpretation, they had it then. Allow me to add few things. First, God created man. Upon His creation, the writer did not mention how he was formed but from dust. How He formed it? Sure the first man had nose, face, ears, hair, shoulders, arms, forearms, hands, torso, buttocks, legs, thighs and feet. Get this, those were not mentioned in the Bible. Correct? Sure we can assume that the have those parts. That's where our imagination sets in. We picture how they look like but that's up to our assumptions or interpretations. Di ba? Now when they had children, that's where other parts came out. Since a fetus needs nutrients from a mother, a singular tube attached to the fetus and it grows to become a baby. When it comes out, that baby still attached to the mother... you know what that is? Umbilical cord. Since Adam was created first, he doesn't have anyone to have *** with so, God created an opposite *** (Eve). Does, eve have umbilical cord too? Guess not. Why? She was one of Adam's ribs. Not from the uterus, don't have a placenta either because Adam was a male or male don't have what females have.

So, do you think both Adam and Eve have umbilical cord? You only have them because you were attached to your mother when you were in her tummy. Both Adam and Eve were not. Sounds clear? I hope this help you think what is right.

All is well, God bless

[JX]

mo quote lang ko ug verses sa bible sir ha (i'm not that bible reader though)...

KJV Gen 5:1-3 This [is] the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him; Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam and Eve, in the day when they were created. And Adam lived a hundred and thirty years, and begat [a son] in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth:

so based ani nga verses, it follows nga ang descendants ni Adam to Seth to our generation are all created in God's likeness and image. since we have bellybuttons ergo, naa poy bellybuttons sila si Adam and Eve...

@ krushuddel: chicken comes first to this world 'coz it was NEVER mentioned that God was making a hatchery or nursery for His creations, automatic ra na clang nanunga through His WORD...

pra nko, we cant interpret the bible literally kay like this Gen 5:1-3, in christianity 3 persona, in other religion ambot unsay hitsura sa ilaha.. and also if it says in the Bible nga 130 years old si Adam, do we interpret that as a 12month year? including leap years and all? then were do we go if its a dead end? go back to faith.. hehe.. but nwei.. i think naa to sila belly buttons, i dont have any proofs, and i aint using the Bible for that.. but i just think it would be nice if they had belly buttons.. dead end.. faith.. hehe..

[krushuddel]

mo quote lang ko ug verses sa bible sir ha (i'm not that bible reader though)...

KJV Gen 5:1-3 This [is] the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him; Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam and Eve, in the day when they were created. And Adam lived a hundred and thirty years, and begat [a son] in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth:

so based ani nga verses, it follows nga ang descendants ni Adam to Seth to our generation are all created in God's likeness and image. since we have bellybuttons ergo, naa poy bellybuttons sila si Adam and Eve...

@ krushuddel: chicken comes first to this world 'coz it was NEVER mentioned that God was making a hatchery or nursery for His creations, automatic ra na clang nanunga through His WORD...

Indeed it is.. no argument about that..

[Soul Doctor]

hahaha... funny question... off course they have bellybuttons... naa mn gni ko...hehehe...

Bright jud ni bata da!

belly bottons comes from a cut umbilical cord di ba?
therefore if you have one it means you have a mother.
So if adam or eve did not have a mother then they must have no umbilical cord much more belly buttons.

But they are just mythical persons.
No use trying to argue about their belly buttons.

[tripwire]

yes they do have..the question is..if Eve dont have asa i connect ni Cain and Abel ang ilahang umbilical cord?

Did you know that Cain and Abel were sons of Adam and Eve? Ang umbilical cord nila are from Eve. Simple, they were IN their mother's womb.

if eve was taken from the rib of Adam, Adam also has a bellybutton..will it contradict science? no it won't...nice thread though..

I don't get this logic. Bellybuttons are umbilical cord... asa man tawn gikan ang umbilical cord? Ribs ni Adam? You have to correct that misrepresentations kay you will fall to tons of mistakes. Now when you said will it contradict science... yes it will not because it was never a question between Adam and Eve creation. But science proved how umbilical cord came from.

[diehard96]

yes they do have..the question is..if Eve dont have asa i connect ni Cain and Abel ang ilahang umbilical cord? if eve was taken from the rib of Adam, Adam also has a bellybutton..will it contradict science? no it won't...nice thread though..

stupid question!

ang anak ma connected sa iyang inahan through sa pusod sa anak -- di through sa pusod sa inahan.

granting for the sake of argument nga tinuod gyud ang storya sa genesis, si eve wa gi anak so way rason nga naa sya'y pusod kay wa sya'y inahan. ang iyang mga anak naa nay pusod kay naa silay inahan.

unsa may gamit kun naay bellyputton si adam? didto gikuha ang rib?