Originally Posted by
bluedes
i'm not against soul doctor, but i also understand fingolfin's concerns..
ako pa nimo "Doc", magbutang ka ug disclaimer para protection sa imong self.. some people may take you seriously, and in the event na sayop imong advice, unsa may buhaton sunod?
what if ni-follow sya imo advice unya nagkadisgrasya siya as a result? will you take responsibility sa imong gihatag na advice? so para safe (legal and whatsoever consequence), ipahibaw lng pud na your advice may or may not work, butangi ug disclaimer.. i think mas-authentic pa na paminawon..
this same reasoning is why real doctors undergo licensure exams.. kay naa jud guarantee ang pasyente na walay malpractice ug kung naa man gani, mistake na to sa iyang pagkatawo, dili sa iyang pagkadoktor..
.. there you go. that's my whole point regarding this issue. giving out false information is very harmful to others. there maybe someone who will follow them and it's only coming from one's ideas.
this same reasoning is why real doctors undergo licensure exams.. kay naa jud guarantee ang pasyente na walay malpractice ug kung naa man gani, mistake na to sa iyang pagkatawo, dili sa iyang pagkadoktor..
.. that is also the reason why i am very much against this said practice, coz i myself is a licensed optometrist. The biggest and most important thing in our ethics is the rule of DONT GIVE OUT FALSE INFORMATION.