Originally Posted by
urejiak
Ang ako pud namatikdan, if bright gyud ka, dako ka chance mo top if naa ka sa CIT ga skul.
But if arang-arang ka, eskuyla nalang USC para dako imo chance for passing.
Ang nahitabo man gud sa cit, kay mura ug unsa ang naa sa pilipinas: dako kaau ug gitang ang dato ug pobre.
sa CIT: Ang bryt, kay bryt gyud. Nya ang below-average, kay maglisod gyud.
sakto gyud ka bai... ang nahitabo man gud sa CIT karun kai EXTREMES.... dapat unta dili papasaron ang dili dapat... awa na daghan kaayu mo flunk sa board... and based on my observation mas ila gipriority ang pagpasar/Top sa Board Exam kaysa sa Curriculum mismo which is very wrong.... 2nd year pa gani Laliman kag top the board dayun ang aim sa proff? Heck why not focus on the curriculum itself and let its students to Learn beyond books/review materials by a comprehensive application of theories thru Research Facilities/Industry linkages? ... which is why fragmented kaayu ang learning sa students.. .. and the results---->>
HALF BAKED GRADUATES kung baga.. nag kuwang na hinuon sa Foundation tungod anang Board Exam-oriented nila nga style.... Im not saying nga mu apply sa tanan ha ofcourse naa gyuy mo Excel and mo Top especially those who are brilliant and upper tier students..
..
I think this is something that Escario and the rest of his Engineering Dept. cohorts should ponder..
To all Technologians: Opinion lang ni ha NO Hard Feelings., Just a concern cebuano... after all my father and a cousin studied there who are now doing well in their respected fields... my respect to CIT the University hopefully this is a wake-up call.. thankss
Matod pato sa isa ka Forum er diri bahalag hagbong basta naa lai top.. hahaha!!! inyu pud nah.. Paging Madina and cohorts?? where are you now.. I need your replies.. please do let your proffs to join this forum.. I would love to have an Intelligent exchange with them but not necessarily a word war or patas anay ug ihi!!
kai concern ko sa CIT... ganahan ko mumata na sila...