EVERYTHING about TITO SOTTO

[peewee_toot]

---

if only dili mga bagag face ang atong mga opisyales ai ky no need na unta ani nga movement. maytag pareha unta ta sa japan oi nga mag-seppuku ang mga tao nga naka sala...

[slkmclaren]

I never said that. What I said was, you never single him out because you feel the need to. Otherwise, I better see names other than TITO SOTTO if the avenue you are talking about is for a better Philippines.Yuo yourself would agree with me that there are more POLITICIANS in the Philippines worthy to grace in the contents of CHANGE.ORG subject to petition for signatures .Unless you just want to talk about TITO SOTTO , there is a thread intended for him already and you can even CUSS him out there if you want to.

yes, i agree with you that there are others out there worthy of such a petition. but bear with me for 1 second. i did not create this thread to talk about tito sotto. it's about the petition. if you can see my 1st post, i did not put anything except the link of the petition.

the subject of the thread and this petition is tito sotto. just comment on that not something else.

Lastly, dont compare EDSA 1 and 2 to any petitions conducted in the net. It is not even in the same league or nature.

why not? edsa 1 and 2 are protest for dissatisfaction. this petition is a dissatisfaction that's why people (the ones who sign the petition) protested for tito sotto to be ousted.

You dont know what you are talking about. He is in the hotseat recently or lately. He is everywhere. Siya ang pulutan on a negative level of discussion and topic. What prevention are you talking about? By making a thread here about CHANGE.ORG makes you as the TS excuses yourself na WALA KA NAG TANGA ?

i perfectly know what i'm talking about. and i know he's in the hotseat recently that's why he's the subject of the petition.

PREVENTION! it means that why would you wait for his term to end when in fact you can do something to change or end his term right now. that's what i called PREVENTION.

by making this thread, i did not excuse myself as WALA KO NAGTANGA. i did not create this thread for change.org. it's the idea of the ongoing petition for tito sotto so my fellow istoryans would be aware of such move.

please don't get out of the thread subject. stick to the petition subject and not change.org for the moment.

You are not getting my drift here. Using CHANGE.ORG to remove SOTTO from the SENATE makes the Philippines better? Two things for you :

- If you created the thread in good faith then this should not exist but to continue in an existing thread that talks about TITO SOTTO.
- If by chance you created this thread because of your disappointment of TITO SOTTO as a senator , does that mean you are happy with the rest of the PUBLIC SERVANTS wether you voted them or not?

i have three things for you:

• whether change.org or istorya.net or ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINES i simply really don't care. what i care about is the petition idea.
• i created this thread in good faith and i believe that there is no other topic here in istorya.net that relates to the ongoing petition. you yourself knows that otherwise you already have merged this thread with the others as what other good istorya.net moderators would do.
• this thread was not created by chance. i'm disappointed with tito sotto because of what he does PUBLICLY. i bet you are too. but this does not mean i am happy with the others. i have my share of disapointments with those you called public servants that's why i don't vote anymore.

The content of their site is REDUNDANT. Its news from YESTERDAY . Its really like you are saying, sila ang proponent for a better Philippines. Kintahay and succeed na imong gipasabot, what or who is next?

Tell you what, do you know the people behind CHANGE.ORG?

I am in no way affiliated to anyone who thinks I am paid me to say this. This are all my opinions that I firmly believed makes sense in a realistic way. I am in no way connected to TITO SOTTO or against the signature campaign of CHANGE.ORG, all I am in for are already stated in my replies. That this is the wrong avenue , signing the petition would be inutile and lastly , the topic is redundant .

again, this is not about change.org. if it does, then i would have included them in the thread subject but i did not. i really respected your opinion, however i would like to ask you to stay on the petition subject and not something else.

[ain]

This petition shows a lot of concern regarding Cyber Crime Law. I hope the petition could be a key to oust Tito Sotto. Well honestly, I was signing on the petition days ago through the link that TS just posted. Whether its possible or impossible, I am wishing that Sotto will be ousted from the Senate.

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

yes, i agree with you that there are others out there worthy of such a petition. but bear with me for 1 second. i did not create this thread to talk about tito sotto. it's about the petition. if you can see my 1st post, i did not put anything except the link of the petition.

the subject of the thread and this petition is tito sotto. just comment on that not something else.

That is why I clearly emphasized in my reply that if this is about TITO SOTTO , there is a thread somewhere where you can discuss it there otherwise , this is another thread that needs not exist.

why not? edsa 1 and 2 are protest for dissatisfaction. this petition is a dissatisfaction that's why people (the ones who sign the petition) protested for tito sotto to be ousted.

On what grounds ? Again , dont compare EDSA 1 and 2 to CHANGE.ORG , it is not in the same channel. Oust TITO SOTTO for what ?

i perfectly know what i'm talking about. and i know he's in the hotseat recently that's why he's the subject of the petition.

Which is for the nth time, the wrong avenue . Both on the substance of the petition and the existence of the thread. Kay if like you said the you knew he is in thelimelight right now, you would not talk about this here but instead conitnue in an existing threa about TITO SOTTO where everyone was talking about his shortcomings , mistakes and issues. Otherwise , if you made this thread for the benefit of everyone to check it out and sign the petition , that makes more sense to me but then again , is this something about TITO SOTTO or for a better Philippines?

PREVENTION! it means that why would you wait for his term to end when in fact you can do something to change or end his term right now. that's what i called PREVENTION.

What are you trying to prevent here TS ? For TITO SOTTO not to commit another PLAGIARISM ? LOL .

by making this thread, i did not excuse myself as WALA KO NAGTANGA. i did not create this thread for change.org. it's the idea of the ongoing petition for tito sotto so my fellow istoryans would be aware of such move.

Which I already said that it is the wrong venue for such action. Mention man ka gud na in short kung dili mi mo pirma or puro ra mi diskusyon wala mi gi buhat ug maayo na lang ni kaysa wala. Let me know when it hits even a million signatures and balitai ko unsay mahitabo kang Tito Sotto .

please don't get out of the thread subject. stick to the petition subject and not change.org for the moment.

Kinsay proponent man diay ani ? Ikaw Mr. SLKMCLAREN or CHANGE.ORG ? Pasabta daw ko.

i have three things for you:

• whether change.org or istorya.net or ANONYMOUS PHILIPPINES i simply really don't care. what i care about is the petition idea.
• i created this thread in good faith and i believe that there is no other topic here in istorya.net that relates to the ongoing petition. you yourself knows that otherwise you already have merged this thread with the others as what other good istorya.net moderators would do.
• this thread was not created by chance. i'm disappointed with tito sotto because of what he does PUBLICLY. i bet you are too. but this does not mean i am happy with the others. i have my share of disapointments with those you called public servants that's why i don't vote anymore.

4 things for you :

- I could have merge this thread just like what other GOOD MODS do here in the forums but I failed it so does that make me a BAD MOD ?
- You did not answer my question . You only position yourself in a safe place by saying you are dissappointed with Sotto and the others too. Are you trying to say here that SENATORS making 120 MILLION COLD CASH after their term is the lesser evil compared to PLAGIARISM ?
- The signature petition you are talking about only equates to dissatisfaction . It does not at all talk about a process that will actually accomplish something which in this case, oust TITO SOTTO .
- Lastly , help make Philippines better by voting the and giving the seat to the right people. If you dont vote anymore and rely only on awareness about SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN because you did not like a public servant is actually doing nothing at all.

again, this is not about change.org. if it does, then i would have included them in the thread subject but i did not. i really respected your opinion, however i would like to ask you to stay on the petition subject and not something else.

Well , I dont see anything why CHANGE.ORG should be excused. Unless you can come up with other proponents that caters the same objectives as CHANGE.ORG which satisfies your craving for ousting someone through signatures.

[silent-kill]

don't vote for sotto mao rana inyong ika baws sa atong senador nga way alam

@SPRINGFIELD_XD_40 " Oust TITO SOTTO for what ?" for incompetence hehehe..
ingon man to si Pnoy "kayo ang boss ko"

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

Seriously ?

Mas angay mag una si PNOY ma oust if that is the case hehehehehe .

[cliff_drew]

even if they make 60 million signatures. that still won't count.

Is it written in the Constitution that any organization can oust a government official if ever they do a signature campaign ??

i guess not.

best solution for this is to be a SMART VOTER.

Look at how many celebrities are running for office and look at how stupid Manny is as a Congressman. He doesn't even know how to construct one proper english sentence how much more the Philippines' Law. Best solution for this and most feasible is DON'T VOTE FOR CELEBRITIES or better still - DON'T VOTE AT ALL

Making people to become smart voters will take a lot of effort and awareness. Even smart ass professionals became stupid when it comes to that. You know the power of money. We must change the culture first to make them smart voters.

don't vote for sotto mao rana inyong ika baws sa atong senador nga way alam

@SPRINGFIELD_XD_40 " Oust TITO SOTTO for what ?" for incompetence hehehe..
ingon man to si Pnoy "kayo ang boss ko"

DON'T VOTE TITO SOTTO only became effective after June 30, 2016 (after his term ends). That is more years of waiting.

[ambokz]

kinsa nka kita sa news kto comment nya regarding sa TRO sa RA10175?for me,the way xa ni comment murag dli senador.tsk tsk..

btw:SUS!3 years pa d-i ni magkyog clap noy noy,daghan pni xang mabuhat na mga silly bills.tsk tsk

[reptoid]

Petitions can be effective... just ask the Supreme Court.

[peewee_toot]

Seriously ?

Mas angay mag una si PNOY ma oust if that is the case hehehehehe .

hahaha. agree ko ani.

murag ubay jud cgro ang ma oust kung kana ang basehan.