Compatibility of Science and Religion

[kebotDiNaMute]

---

i love to cheer.

kong ang data nakapasar sa scrutiny sa mga bang giitang thinkers no need to think twice. and speaking of good and bad data. asa may mas naay scientific punch. ang creation nga dili ma examine ang katinood sa Ginoo o ang Evolution nga naay scientific explanations? mas katohoan ang Evolution kebotdinamute.

ikaw beh tagae ko ug scientific mechanism nga naay Ginoo nga nagbuhat sa universe. kong wala gani aw totyo pod ka.

note: mo go down ko sa level ni kebotdinamute, sama daw ni jesus, para makasabot ang mga tao niya dapat daw magpakatao siya to reach man. mao na akong bohaton for the next succeeding posts. go down ko sa iyang level para ma reach nato ni siya.

sige tira dong.

Ok then,

kong ang data nakapasar sa scrutiny sa mga bang giitang thinkers no need to think twice
--- What data please post details so we can be specific. Internet is an overload of data... easy to find one.. or is it?


"asa may mas naay scientific punch"
--- did science explained the beggining of life? can science explain miracles? can science explain what are thoughts made up of? Science is trying, but for now science cannot explain and yea dogma does. At the moment brad, let evolution fight for these data because if you talk about scientific fact on these things your so-called THEORY FAILS. So, anymore science against dogma?

Please do provide meat if you want to bash... or else, ill ignore your desire...

[kebotDiNaMute]

it could be , i can see ur point . pero the fossils alone and the grand canon . so as the fossil fuels . is pretty convincing enough.,

so to speak , u see the creation story unsatisfactory also ?

yes, its not acceptable, especially to other religion and none... I don't have to fight for it... but we can talk about your evolution.

[HALIKniHUDAS]

don't associate with me bro! i have my choice and freewill. Im making these people busy... i hope i did... enjoy!

no matter what you do, pildi gihapon ka.

[HALIKniHUDAS]

Ok then,

kong ang data nakapasar sa scrutiny sa mga bang giitang thinkers no need to think twice
--- What data please post details so we can be specific. Internet is an overload of data... easy to find one.. or is it?


"asa may mas naay scientific punch"
--- did science explained the beggining of life? can science explain miracles? can science explain what are thoughts made up of? Science is trying, but for now science cannot explain and yea dogma does. At the moment brad, let evolution fight for these data because if you talk about scientific fact on these things your so-called THEORY FAILS. So, anymore science against dogma?

Please do provide meat if you want to bash... or else, ill ignore your desire...

let me answer this for my friend. data that supports evolution. ikaw asa imong data nga nag support ug creationism? tagae ko og mechanism ana. na kay ikapakita? maputi na lang ang uling wa kay maipakita.

kay nganon can you and your bible explain the beginning of life? can you and your bible explain miracles? can you and your bible explain what thoughts are made of? sigoro ignorante ka about quantum physics, kay tungod naay dili ma explain sa science pasabot ana tinood na ang imong Fairy Tale nga naay Ginoo? pagka totyo jud. naay miracles kay naa ginoo? hahaha pagka convenient. morag convenient store nga 24hrs.

hala...naay gravity, ah naa diay ginoo,hahahahahaha mao nay pasabot nimo? pastilan. hala naayo akong sakit, so pasabot naay Ginoo? tsk tsk...

kay ngano tanaw nimo kanang imong mga bashing naay onod? pagka totyo. imo ra ng hona hona nga naa.

[kebotDiNaMute]

let me answer this for my friend. data that supports evolution. ikaw asa imong data nga nag support ug creationism? tagae ko og mechanism ana. na kay ikapakita? maputi na lang ang uling wa kay maipakita.

kay nganon can you and your bible explain the beginning of life? can you and your bible explain miracles? can you and your bible explain what thoughts are made of? sigoro ignorante ka about quantum physics, kay tungod naay dili ma explain sa science pasabot ana tinood na ang imong Fairy Tale nga naay Ginoo? pagka totyo jud. naay miracles kay naa ginoo? hahaha pagka convenient. morag convenient store nga 24hrs.

hala...naay gravity, ah naa diay ginoo,hahahahahaha mao nay pasabot nimo? pastilan. hala naayo akong sakit, so pasabot naay Ginoo? tsk tsk...

kay ngano tanaw nimo kanang imong mga bashing naay onod? pagka totyo. imo ra ng hona hona nga naa.

let me answer this for my friend. data that supports evolution. ikaw asa imong data nga nag support ug creationism? tagae ko og mechanism ana. na kay ikapakita? maputi na lang ang uling wa kay maipakita.
--- asa imo support? hahaha! wala man lage? well i never insist? read previous posts... i don't contest... so you want to contest your evo? then lets do evo... Don't ask me to contest something i dont want... hehehe... bias? then stop insisting yours, just say no contest... hahaha!


hala...naay gravity, ah naa diay ginoo,hahahahahaha mao nay pasabot nimo? pastilan. hala naayo akong sakit, so pasabot naay Ginoo?
--- and naa pakoy e dungag, bsin naay cookbook imo ma basa sa dogma... hahaha! pastilan utoka...

naay conflict ang gravity og dogma? ni ingon ang dogma walay gravity? wala ni mention cya gravity? wala? so unsay problema? WALA... idiotas... hahha!


kay ngano tanaw nimo kanang imong mga bashing naay onod? pagka totyo. imo ra ng hona
hona nga naa.
--- then why bother? hmmm... ang boang makig storya sa boang.. aw... kabalu naka unsa resulta.. hahaha. toytoy jud... ROFL

[kebotDiNaMute]

no matter what you do, pildi gihapon ka.

hahah, naa diay byuti contes diri? hahaha! patay mao na sayop nmo brad... kini mga tawo sa S&O, they never seek anang term kadaugan... they want to know something... if mao diay na imo gus2 daog ka.. hala daog naka x 10^99999999999999.

Hala pag kwenta sa imo daug ha... pamahin pod...

[HALIKniHUDAS]

let me answer this for my friend. data that supports evolution. ikaw asa imong data nga nag support ug creationism? tagae ko og mechanism ana. na kay ikapakita? maputi na lang ang uling wa kay maipakita.
--- asa imo support? hahaha! wala man lage? well i never insist? read previous posts... i don't contest... so you want to contest your evo? then lets do evo... Don't ask me to contest something i dont want... hehehe... bias? then stop insisting yours, just say no contest... hahaha!

gi tudlo naman gani na sa mga eskwelahan nya mangutana pa ka kong asa ang data. tsk tsk tsk. ayaw,hadlok ka mo insist kay wa man kay ikapakita. kung wa kay ikapakita aw natural dagan na lang. nya kong modagan ka unsaon na lang nimo pag am am ning iroa,mapaakn jud ka.

hala...naay gravity, ah naa diay ginoo,hahahahahaha mao nay pasabot nimo? pastilan. hala naayo akong sakit, so pasabot naay Ginoo?
--- and naa pakoy e dungag, bsin naay cookbook imo ma basa sa dogma... hahaha! pastilan utoka...

naay conflict ang gravity og dogma? ni ingon ang dogma walay gravity? wala ni mention cya gravity? wala? so unsay problema? WALA... idiotas... hahha!


kay ngano tanaw nimo kanang imong mga bashing naay onod? pagka totyo. imo ra ng hona
hona nga naa.
--- then why bother? hmmm... ang boang makig storya sa boang.. aw... kabalu naka unsa resulta.. hahaha. toytoy jud... ROFL

imo bitaw ng ponto ako ra gibalik nimo. so ikaw ang idiota.

naglisod naka og connect kebot? wala na kay mahonahonaan nga losot? dogma og gravity? kalayo na nimo. walay connection.

walay apil ang bother bother ani kebot. tira bisag asa ni ako.

[HALIKniHUDAS]

hahah, naa diay byuti contes diri? hahaha! patay mao na sayop nmo brad... kini mga tawo sa S&O, they never seek anang term kadaugan... they want to know something... if mao diay na imo gus2 daog ka.. hala daog naka x 10^99999999999999.

Hala pag kwenta sa imo daug ha... pamahin pod...

naa sigoro kay makig contest man ka.

[chad_tukes]

Carbon dating are nowhere near accurate...

you can never accurately describe the exact age of a fossil. carbon dating play on estimates. just because it estimates the age of an organism doesn't mean it's wrong. that's what the scientific process is all about. did you take Science back in HS?

--- serious error you have here... its not about years.. its about generation.. POV.
--- well its the same story... "they lived happily ever after..." want me to tell you the INTRO? FAIRYTALE

wait, you just said 60 years! haha... another failed "illusion" attempt by the master illusionist KEBOT.

--- this is you counter? well i never said anything... Im not pushing my idea... so cut the crap... give me us an updated news on EVOLUTION.

you keep pushing non-sense crap like creationsim which a FALSE BELIEF. what are your proofs? your reasoning?

By the way another fossil has been found believed to be the deceendant of man from ape. Missing Link. 95% Complete. You see, im very excited both ways.. if they found out its wrong hahahaha! katawa nalang...

it is a work in progress. at least it is at work. man has a natural hunger for searching and/or discovering things and he will not stop until he comes to a conclusion. faith, on the other hand, is conclusive. the creationist's argument----GOD CREATED EVERYTHING, and it stops there.

FAIL.

[tripwire]

Kebz, are you back to square one about evolution again? you keep on arguing the same stuff over over and over again. Doesn't make you dizzy?

descendant of man from ape

Seriously dodong kebz, I am confused the way you constructed this sentence. But somehow I understand what it means... first, apes are not descendants of men... they are distant cousins that came from one source. Imagine a tree, with that tree, there are branches and those "branches" are figuratively speaking are different types of species. Apes are one of those "branches" not as what you think that men came from Apes. Because that is totally a wrong conclusion. However, creationists arguably strong with this ideas because they can't pin point the reason why there are still apes in this planet while the fact is that... they are actually your cousins... my cousins.. everyone's cousins. Now, if you don't like my arguments... please read! As I have told you numerous times.