diba naa man unta saad ang mga aquino ani? agrarian reform ba na? wala pa man gyud to natinuod. in process pa man.
diba naa man unta saad ang mga aquino ani? agrarian reform ba na? wala pa man gyud to natinuod. in process pa man.
ok adto me sa abogado ky lisod kaayo ni nga istorya mas maayo cguro ini nga bro & sis no mo adto me sa DAR naa man pud clay Abogado didto aron masaysay ug mahuban ang among problema noh.
if there is a written agreement between the owner and your lolo its better to check it first.
pangutana:
1. Kinsa ngalan sa Titolo?
2. Kinsa nagbayad ug buwis (land tax)?
3. Nagrenta ba mo sa yuta (monthly or yearly)?
4. Kinsay namuhunan everytime magtanum sa ricefields?
5. Naa ba bahin ang tag-iya sa yuta every mag-ani? Pila ka %?
6. Nagfile ba imong Lolo ug Income Tax Return?
7. Registrado na imong Lolo sa DAR as farmers?
8. Naa ba mo contract with the lan owner "Share Tenancy Contract"?
9. Was the contract registered in the Office of the Municipal Treasurer where the land belong.
mao na basic questions na kinahanglan masulti para matambagan ka.. Salamat
ang pina ka maayo nimong buhaton sir moadto ka ug abogado.. ug gusto kag libre nga serbisyo, adto sa Public Attorneys Office...
subay aning imong problema diay lakbit-saysay sa balaod ubos sa Acta Republika 1199 (R.A. 1199) nga gitawag ug; AN ACT TO GOVERN THE RELATIONS BETWEEN LANDHOLDERS AND TENANTS OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS (LEASEHOLDS AND SHARE TENANCY) mao kini :
PART IV
SECURITY OF TENURE
Section 49. Ejectment of Tenant. — Notwithstanding any agreement or provision of law as to the period, in all cases where land devoted to any agricultural purpose is held under any system of tenancy, the tenant shall not be dispossessed of his holdings except for any of the causes hereinafter enumerated and only after the same has been proved before, and the dispossession is authorized by, the court.
Section 50. Causes for the Dispossession of a Tenant. — Any of the following shall be a sufficient cause for the dispossession of a tenant from his holdings:
(a) The bona fide intention of the landholder to cultivate the land himself personally or through the employment of farm machinery and implements: Provided, however, That should the landholder not cultivate the land himself or should fail to employ mechanical farm implements for a period of one year after the dispossession of the tenant, it shall be presumed that he acted in bad faith and the land and damages for any loss incurred by him because of said dispossession: Provided, further, That the land-holder shall, at least one year but not more than two years prior to the date of his petition to dispossess the tenant under this subsection, file notice with the court and shall inform the tenant in wiring in a language or dialect known to the latter of his intention to cultivate the land himself, either personally or through the employment of mechanical implements, together with a certification of the Secretary of Agriculture and Natural Resources that the land is suited for mechanization: Provided, further, That the dispossessed tenant and the members of his immediate household shall be preferred in the employment of necessary laborers under the new set-up.
(b) When the current tenant violates or fails to comply with any of the terms and conditions of the contract or any of the provisions of this Act: Provided, however, That this subsection shall not apply when the tenant has substantially complied with the contract or with the provisions of this Act.
(c) The tenant’s failure to pay the agreed rental or to deliver the landholder’s share: Provided, however, That this shall not apply when the tenant’s failure is caused by a fortuitous event or force majeure.
(d) When the tenant uses the land for a purpose other than that specified by agreement of the parties.
(e) When a share-tenant fails to follow those proven farm practices which will contribute towards the proper care of the land and increased agricultural production.
(f) When the tenant through negligence permits serious injury to the land which will impair its productive capacity.
(g) Conviction by a competent court of a tenant or any member of his immediate family or farm household of a crime against the landholder or a member of his immediate family.
Section 51. Burden of Proof . — The burden of proof to show the existence of a lawful cause for the ejectment of a tenant shall rest upon the landholder.
kinsa man ng sugo nga pabantayan ninyo ang yuta? ang tagiya? o kamo ra ang ninghagyo nga mo bantay? kay kung kamo ra..para nako pwde ra wala moy makuha..dapat mg pasalamt pamo sa tagiya..pro kung ang tagiya mismo ang ni hangyo nga pabantayan sa imo lolo...dapat bayaran sa taiya imo lolo agig pasalamat pro dili mo mg expect nga dako..
pro kung ang iyong basihanan nga dapat bayaran mo o dapat naa mo bahin sa yuta tungod kay dugay na ng saop inyo lolo murag dili sakto para nako...nahug nga murag na ug problema sa squatter...
@ noy pilo: ang section 50. wala my gi suway sa agreement in between sa landlord ug ako lolo puro mana na comply tanan wala my gi lapasan ana. unya permi man cya ga bayad or gahatag sa bahin ngadto sa tagiya.
ang gasugo ani bro mismo ang tagiya aduna cly agreement. dayon kini before lasang ni cya sense 1960 ang pagkultibar unya ang nagpahawa sa ako lolo mga anak nalang ky nipanaw na ang tagiya mismo bali ang sumusunod ang nagpahawa mao ako lolo maoy nag kultibar para mahimong landfield kana nga lasang.
Similar Threads |
|