d3000 para daghan nata.. hehehe
if naa ka budge, go for D90![]()
d3000 para daghan nata.. hehehe
if naa ka budge, go for D90![]()
Complicated man ang tubag ani imo questions boss
Ani na lang if you have the cash to purchase the higher-end lens (L) then body only ra ang palita. Otherwise get the bundled kitlens nga 18-55 then build up your skills from there. I agree nga ang kitlens nga 18-55 sa Canon is just a so so lens but I've meet several people here in Istorya who only use the so so kitlens to take several stunning images I've ever seen maka-ingon ka nga kitlens rani pre?
You might wanna take into consideration also unsa nga type of photography imo gusto i-specialized: portraits/landscape/sports etc ky mag-matter pod ang lens imo gamiton ani.
HTH
For me, get a D90 if you can afford it. Aside from nindot kau siya, you will get a decent kit lens with longer range (18-105VR) so you wont need to buy another walkaround lens na. I am a former Canon user who switched to Nikon. Ako ra masulti mao ni....Both are good cameras and are capable of taking excellent photos although masnindot ug flash system ang Nikon.. Also, ang Nikon, maslig-on lang jud both sa lenses ug sa body. I know of so many horrror stories about Canon cameras breaking down and haven't heard the same about Nikons. I am a D90 and D60 user and our office uses 4 D300s, a D200 and a D2X. They are all very rugged and durable. But in the end, I think its better to use the brand that most of your friends are using so you can borrow gear fron each other. Just remember, it's not the arrow, it's the Indian...hehehe.....just my 2 cents worth.
unsa difference sa nikon d90 and d5000
Similar Threads |
|