True Age of the Universe - Biblical Fact - From Age 0 to Jesus

[silent-kill]

---

the word "biblical" and "fact" does not go well hand in hand

[Kenshiro]

One liners and ad homneim go hand in hand.

[Saga]

i believe carbon dating is used by vatican to determine the age of some scriptures or relic of christianity... ?? if it is so unrealiable why is that so..

and please provide links and supporting information about the freshly killed seal

HowStuffWorks "Carbon-14 Dating: Lots More Information"

[Grammaton]

i believe carbon dating is used by vatican to determine the age of some scriptures or relic of christianity... ?? if it is so unrealiable why is that so..

and please provide links and supporting information about the freshly killed seal

HowStuffWorks "Carbon-14 Dating: Lots More Information"

Carbon dating is very inaccurate.
Carbon Dating: Why you cant trust it or other radiometric dating methods. creation evolution young earth evidence old earth bible

[SioDenz]

the word "biblical" and "fact" does not go well hand in hand

Depends on what is the Basis of your so-called Facts. If your So-called Facts are based on LIMITED Science - then YES, it does Not go hand in hand.

[Grammaton]

Atheism and fraud maybe can go hand in hand.

[biano]

Reality is there are lots of religions in this world but there are such things as True and False Religion. Only one religion holds the true answer, the true Religion based on the Holy Scripture (Biblical).

Eisegesis - Reading the Scripture "With" the influence of outside sources, from outside in. Example: Putting Billions of Years in Genesis for the sake of the fake science theory of evolution.

Exegesis - Reading the Scripture as it is, from inside out. Scripture is filled with "figures of speech"(proverbs,ect) but Genesis 1 obviously doesn't have any.


Ka klaro anang Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4, Day 5, Day 6 <- Adam was made not as a baby but mature, then in Day 6 Adam begins his age - Obviously

Asa man intawn ang Billions and Billions of years ana oi.. Taronga kono niyo ug pag analyze.

Pasabot ba anang Day 1 is 10,000,000,000 years, zero months, 1 day/s since creation? or Day 1 gyd siya?

Ayaw ninyo usba ang Bible mga bro. Klaroha kuno tani. Kay maayo kaayo ta mo sulti - Sola Scriptura nya diay to ang Scriptura atong Gi pun-an ug billions of years.

[biano]

Carbon dating is very inaccurate.
Carbon Dating: Why you cant trust it or other radiometric dating methods. creation evolution young earth evidence old earth bible

Carbon Dating are based on pure assumptions. Dating the rock by the fossils around it and dating the fossils by the rocks around it <- Circular Reasoning.

Coal is said to be 295 million years old. Wow Cool kaayo bro.. Ka amazing. Pre-historic, pre-man pa kuno.

But evidence shows: In 1912, Frank Kennard, an electric plant worker, broke apart a large lump of coal, and an iron cup fell from the center, leaving a cast of the pot in the coal. The coal came from the Wilurton Coal Mines and is about 295 million years old, from the Mid-Pennsylvanian.






Nya ingon dayon mga scientist/historians, na ang cast iron kono na invent around 4th century BC China. <- wow ka bryt.

But yet Bible says in the Pre Flood Era:

And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain, an instructer of every artificer in brass and iron: and the sister of Tubalcain was Naamah. - Genesis 4:22


Someone's definitely wrong. It's either the historians, or the God-breath Scripture.

Rapid formation of coal: Proof that strata form rapidly and that the earth is young.
Iron pot in coal (Talk.Origins) - CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science

[biano]

Depends on what is the Basis of your so-called Facts. If your So-called Facts are based on LIMITED Science - then YES, it does Not go hand in hand.

Of course mo reply dayon na sila trying to salvage whats left sa ilang fake and dangerous na theory of evolution bro.

[ketllac]

naay factor nga makaapekto sa radiocarbon dating like volcanic eruption. pero dili nimo na ma reduce ang reliability to zero dili man sad na infallible nga system nga sakto all the time. but one thing for sure before mobalik sa nitrogen ang carbon 14 sa usa ka fossils naa na siyay half life nga 5,700 years nga nearly constant..hapit na man gani na molapas sa inyong gi claim nga 6,000 years ba to? so tiguwang na kaayo ang kalibutan..