You can be a moral person without God...

[schmuck]

---

^ chad's point james is this,
Scientists dismiss hypothesis that require negative proof. Something that you, as a "scientist", should know.

[kebotDiNaMute]

how are you sure they don't live with it? even if they don't, that would not change the fact they are still believers. some would even kill in the "name of GOD/Allah" .... hmmm, suicide bombers, anyone? and i know some of you would object by saying "they are blinded by faith. if they were indeed true followers of God/Allah, they wouldn't do such thing". well too bad coz they are doing just that---their faith to Allah is so strong they'd do anything for him. now tell, how the F is that different from today's Christians? do you see how fundamentalist faith can become dangerous?

some would even kill in the "name of GOD/Allah"
--- ask the responsible... I only stand on the Christian faith.. let them speak for themselves...

how the F is that different from today's Christians?
--- we dont have strap-on smoke vest... we have faith... and we have Christ. We are believing in a totally different God... if you cannot determine a dog and a cat... then that is not my fault.

do you see how fundamentalist faith can become dangerous?
--- yes if you believe in ALLAH. My faith doesnt even make me think of hurting you... but i will personally enjoy mocking you! did you see the picture?

[schmuck]

Is this what you're saying bro, that science can't disprove God? If so, how can you rely on science then to give you answers to the question whether there is or there isn't a God?

Science has proven that the genesis story is not true. By extension, also the Abrahamic god.

[Traditz]

Science has proven that the genesis story is not true. By extension, also the Abrahamic god.

How has science proven that the Genesis story is not true bro?

[kebotDiNaMute]

yep. because your personal experience is the measuring stick that everyone else can use.


/s

logic fail...

personal means personal... not applicable to everyone... pag sure oi... hahaha

[kebotDiNaMute]

Science has proven that the genesis story is not true. By extension, also the Abrahamic god.

NOT TRUE? tungaw ngaw ngaw! hahaha! Ikaw ra nag ingon oi dili science...

Progressive Creationist Hugh Ross, who is he and what does he believe? - ChristianAnswers.Net

bsin wala paka ka basa ani na theory... relax smack ayaw palabi sa feelings... hehhe

[kebotDiNaMute]

for you parder


"science only shows the highest probability of proof of intelligent design" <- citations/sources please.

In what descipline?

du know that dna is a set of instruction way more advance than microsoft? bill gates said it... if you are focusing on a design.. then how come there are instructions? who made this instructions?

unsa diay ni transformers? EMS bsan trashcan mabuhi... hahaha! watching too much movies smak? hmmmm...

nalooy bya ko ni JAZZ gi ihaw sa part one... huhuhu!

[schmuck]

How has science proven that the Genesis story is not true bro?

We now know that all the creatures on earth were NOT created at the same time and that they have NOT stayed always the same until now.
The world is NOT 10K years old.
The earth is NOT the center of the universe.
The flood did NOT happen.
etc etc etc

logic fail...

personal means personal... not applicable to everyone... pag sure oi... hahaha

HAHAHA!!! pay attention kebot. eyes on the board!

NOT TRUE? tungaw ngaw ngaw! hahaha! Ikaw ra nag ingon oi dili science...

Progressive Creationist Hugh Ross, who is he and what does he believe? - ChristianAnswers.Net

bsin wala paka ka basa ani na theory... relax smack ayaw palabi sa feelings... hehhe

scientifically peer-reviewed ni?

*edit btw, unsa ang point sa imong link? haha murag girefute man sa iyang fellow creationist ning si Hugh Ross lagi. pag chur oi.

[kebotDiNaMute]

^ chad's point james is this,
Scientists dismiss hypothesis that require negative proof. Something that you, as a "scientist", should know.

scientist always have theory don't close on it... you know what there are a lot of things that have been discovered by accident... becareful about theories...

proving theories is another story... so if james are looking at the skeptic way of things that is because some serious question has never been addressed yet... so relax smak... we will wait for james to do what he is paid for... because there is no value on what you have shared only a reflection of man with idiocity or arrogance in mind.

[kebotDiNaMute]

We now know that all the creatures on earth were NOT created at the same time and that they have NOT stayed always the same until now.
The world is NOT 10K years old.
The earth is NOT the center of the universe.
The flood did NOT happen.
etc etc etc

HAHAHA!!! pay attention kebot. eyes on the board!




scientifically peer-reviewed ni?

Originally Posted by schmuck
yep. because your personal experience is the measuring stick that everyone else can use.
personal means personal... not applicable to everyone... pag sure oi... hahaha
--- read again... eyes on the board smak... EPIC FAIL.

scientifically peer-reviewed ni?
--- keep reading you will understand his point, and yes.. dr. ross is trying to link evolution and creation... not unless you dont understand... then there is nothing more i can help you...
KEEP READING.

The world is NOT 10K years old.
-- dr ross said billions of years.

The earth is NOT the center of the universe.
-- even the SUN is not the Center... and bible said it, its not...

The flood did NOT happen.
-- well giant clams does not do very well in climbing.... hundreds of terrified clams has been found on MT. EVEREST. maybe billions of years ago clams fly... what du think?